Human carcinomas frequently express high levels of receptors in the EGF receptor family, and overexpression of at least two of these receptors, the EGF receptor (EGFr) and closely related ErbB2, has been associated with a more aggressive clinical behavior. Further, transfection or activation of high levels of these two receptors in nonmalignant cell lines can lead to a transformed phenotype. For these reasons therapies directed at preventing the function of these receptors have the potential to be useful anti-cancer treatments. In the last two decades monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) which block activation of the EGFr and ErbB2 have been developed. These MAbs have shown promising preclinical activity and`chimeric' and`humanized' MAbs have been produced in order to obviate the problem of host immune reactions. Clinical activity with these antibodies has been documented: trastuzumab, a humanized anti-ErbB2 MAb, is active and was recently approved in combination with paclitaxel for the therapy of patients with metastatic ErbB2-overexpressing breast cancer; IMC-C225, a chimeric anti-EGFr MAb, has shown impressive activity when combined with radiation therapy and reverses resistance to chemotherapy. In addition to antibodies, compounds that directly inhibit receptor tyrosine kinases have shown preclinical activity and early clinical activity has been reported. A series of phase III studies with these antibodies and direct tyrosine kinase inhibitors are ongoing or planned, and will further address the role of these active anti-receptor agents in the treatment of patients with cancer. Oncogene (2000) 19, 6550 ± 6565.

rhuMAb HER2 is well tolerated and clinically active in patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancers that had received extensive prior therapy. This is evidence that targeting growth factor receptors can cause regression of human cancer and justifies further evaluation of this agent.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a tyrosine kinase receptor of the ErbB family that is abnormally activated in many epithelial tumors. Receptor activation leads to recruitment and phosphorylation of several downstream intracellular substrates, leading to mitogenic signaling and other tumor-promoting cellular activities. In human tumors, receptor overexpression correlates with a more aggressive clinical course. Taken together, these observations indicate that the EGFR is a promising target for cancer therapy. Monoclonal antibodies directed at the ligand-binding extracellular domain and low-molecular weight inhibitors of the receptor's tyrosine kinase are currently in advanced stages of clinical development. These agents prevent ligand-induced receptor activation and downstream signaling, which results in cell cycle arrest, promotion of apoptosis, and inhibition of angiogenesis. They also enhance the antitumor effects of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. In patients, anti-EGFR agents can be given safely at doses that fully inhibit receptor signaling, and single-agent activity has been observed against a variety of tumor types, including colon carcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, ovarian carcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma. Although antitumor activity is significant, responses have been seen in only a minority of the patients treated. In some clinical trials, anti-EGFR agents enhanced the effects of conventional chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Ongoing research efforts are directed at the selection of patients with EGFR-dependent tumors, identification of the differences among the various classes of agents, and new clinical development strategies.

No abstract

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) at 3 nM maximally inhibits the proliferation of A431 epidermoid carcinoma cells. We show that at lower concentrations, in the range of 3-100 pM, EGF has a mitogenic effect on A431 cells. In Epidermal growth factor (EGF) promotes the growth of many cell types in vitro (1-3) and inhibits proliferation of several cell types-e.g., GH4 rat pituitary tumor cells (4), A431 epidermoid carcinoma cells (5, 6), and certain human breast cancer cells (7). EGF initially binds to receptors homogeneously distributed on the cell surface. Subsequent events have been described by various investigators and include receptor phosphorylation, aggregation, internalization, and degradation in lysosomes (1). The mechanism by which these events induce DNA synthesis and cytokinesis is unknown.It has been found that at least 6-8 hr of EGF exposure are required to stimulate DNA synthesis (8). Das and Fox have suggested that EGF-induced internalization and degradation of the EGF receptor are rate-limiting factors for EGF-induced mitogenesis (9, 10), perhaps through production of a second messenger. Recent studies showed enhancement of EGF stimulation of DNA synthesis by amine compounds, which inhibited clustering of receptors in coated pits (11), and by phorbol esters, which reduced both the affinity of EGF receptors for EGF and its subsequent degradation (12)(13)(14). These results suggest that EGF stimulation of cell growth might only require the presence of EGF-EGF receptor complexes at the cell surface in contradiction to the above hypothesis.Shechter et al., on the other hand, suggested that the stimulatory effect of EGF might be mediated by small amounts of high-affinity EGF receptors, which remain at the cell surface for more than 8 hr when occupied by EGF (15). King and Cuatrecasas also have suggested that the accumulation of stable intracellular complexes between high-affinity receptors and EGF are involved in growth stimulation, but the role of these highaffinity receptors in mitogenesis remains unclear (16).A431 cells lend themselves to the study of EGF interactions with receptors because of their extremely high number of EGF receptors (1-3 x 10' per cell) (1,17,18

Precision medicine focuses on DNA abnormalities, but not all tumors have tractable genomic alterations. The WINTHER trial () navigated patients to therapy on the basis of fresh biopsy-derived DNA sequencing (arm A; 236 gene panel) or RNA expression (arm B; comparing tumor to normal). The clinical management committee (investigators from five countries) recommended therapies, prioritizing genomic matches; physicians determined the therapy given. Matching scores were calculated post-hoc for each patient, according to drugs received: for DNA, the number of alterations matched divided by the total alteration number; for RNA, expression-matched drug ranks. Overall, 303 patients consented; 107 (35%; 69 in arm A and 38 in arm B) were evaluable for therapy. The median number of previous therapies was three. The most common diagnoses were colon, head and neck, and lung cancers. Among the 107 patients, the rate of stable disease ≥6 months and partial or complete response was 26.2% (arm A: 23.2%; arm B: 31.6% (P=0.37)). The patient proportion with WINTHER versus previous therapy progression-free survival ratio of >1.5 was 22.4%, which did not meet the pre-specified primary end point. Fewer previous therapies, better performance status and higher matching score correlated with longer progression-free survival (all P<0.05, multivariate). Our study shows that genomic and transcriptomic profiling are both useful for improving therapy recommendations and patient outcome, and expands personalized cancer treatment.

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors are expressed at high levels in about one third of epithelial cancers, and autocrine activation of EGF receptors appears to be critical for the growth of many tumors. We hypothesized that blockade of the binding sites for EGF and transforming growth factor-α on EGF receptors with an antireceptor monoclonal antibody (mAb) might be an effective anti-cancer therapy. We produced murine mAb 225 against EGF receptors and demonstrated blockade of receptor function, as well as inhibition of cell growth in cultures and in nude mouse xenografts. mAb C225 is the human:murine chimeric version of mAb 225. Cell cycle inhibition occurred in G 1 phase, and was due to upregulation of p27 Kip1 , resulting in inhibition of cyclin E/cyclin dependent kinase-2 activity and hypophosphorylation of Rb. In addition, the amount and/or activities of a number of proapoptotic molecules were enhanced. The antitumor activity in vivo against xenografts was at least partly attributable to reduced vascularization, resulting from decreased vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor production by the tumor cells. Metastasis of xenografts was curtailed with mAB C225 treatment, accompanied by a decrease in tumor production of MMP-9. Further studies showed that mAbs 225 and C225 enhanced the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy against xenografts of a variety of human cancer cell lines. Well established xenografts resistant to either mAb or drug treatment alone were eradicated by the combination therapy. Drugs for which this has been demonstrated include doxorubicin, paclitaxel, cisplatin, and topotecan. Antibody treatment also potentiated the responsiveness of human tumor xenografts to radiation therapy. These findings led to clinical trials of human:murine chimeric mAb C225 in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Results from phase I and II trials involving more than 500 patients are quite promising, in particular in advanced head and neck cancer treated with C225 plus cisplatin or radiation, in advanced colon cancer treated with C225 plus CPT-11, and in advanced pancreatic cancer treated with C225 plus gemcitabine. Phase III trials are now underway.

C225 has dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, and doses that achieve saturation of systemic clearance are well tolerated. C225 given in combination with cisplatin has biologic activity at pharmacologically relevant doses.