ObjectivesFinancial stress has been identified as a barrier to antiretroviral adherence, but only in resourcelimited settings. Almost half of HIV-infected Australian adults earn no regular income and, despite highly subsidised antiretroviral therapy and universal health care, 3% of HIV-infected Australians cease antiretroviral therapy each year. We studied the relationship between financial stress and treatment adherence in a resource-rich setting. MethodsOut-patients attending the HIV clinic at St Vincent's Hospital between November 2010 and May 2011 were invited to complete an anonymous survey including questions relating to costs and adherence. ResultsOf 335 HIV-infected patients (95.8% male; mean age 52 years; hepatitis coinfection 9.2%), 65 patients (19.6%) stated that it was difficult or very difficult to meet pharmacy dispensing costs, 49 (14.6%) reported that they had delayed purchasing medication because of pharmacy costs, and 30 (9.0%) reported that they had ceased medication because of pharmacy costs. Of the 65 patients with difficulties meeting pharmacy costs, 19 (29.2%) had ceased medication vs. 11 (4.1%) of the remaining 270 patients (P < 0.0001). In addition, 19 patients (5.7%) also stated that it was difficult or very difficult to meet travel costs to the clinic. Treatment cessation and interruption were both independently associated with difficulty meeting both pharmacy and clinic travel costs. Only 4.9% had been asked if they were having difficulty paying for medication. ConclusionsThese are the first data to show that pharmacy dispensing and clinic travel costs may affect treatment adherence in a resource-rich setting. Patients should be asked if financial stress is limiting their treatment adherence.

BackgroundMissing more than one tablet of contemporary antiretroviral therapy (ART) per month increases the risk of virological failure. Recent studies evaluating a comprehensive range of potential risk factors for suboptimal adherence are not available for high-income settings.MethodsAdults on ART with undetectable viral load (UDVL) were recruited into a national, multi-centre cohort, completing a comprehensive survey assessing demographics, socio-economic indicators, physical health, well-being, life stressors, social supports, HIV disclosure, HIV-related stigma and discrimination, healthcare access, ART regimen, adherence, side effects, costs and treatment beliefs. Baseline data were assessed, and suboptimal adherence was defined as self-reported missing ≥1 ART dose/month over the previous 3-months; associated factors were identified using bivariate and multivariate binary logistic regression.ResultsWe assessed 522 participants (494 [94.5%] men, mean age = 50.8 years, median duration UDVL = 3.3 years [IQR = 1.2–6.8]) at 17 sexual health, hospital, and general practice clinics across Australia. Seventy-eight participants (14.9%) reported missing ≥1 dose/month over the previous three months, which was independently associated with: being Australian-born (AOR [adjusted odds ratio] = 2.4 [95%CI = 1.2–4.9], p = 0.014), not being in a relationship (AOR = 3.3 [95%CI = 1.5–7.3], p = 0.004), reaching the “Medicare safety net” (capping annual medical/pharmaceutical costs) (AOR = 2.2 [95%CI = 1.1–4.5], p = 0.024), living in subsidised housing (AOR = 2.5 [95%CI = 1.0–6.2], p = 0.045), receiving home-care services (AOR = 4.4 [95%CI = 1.0–18.8], p = 0.046), HIV community/outreach services linkage (AOR = 2.4 [95%CI = 1.1–5.4], p = 0.033), and starting ART following self-request (AOR = 3.0 [95%CI = 1.3–7.0], p = 0.012).ConclusionsIn this population, 15% reported recent suboptimal ART adherence at levels associated in prospective studies with subsequent virological failure, despite all having an undetectable viral load. Associations were with social/economic/cultural/patient engagement factors, but not ART regimen/clinical factors. These associations may help identify those at higher risk of future virological failure and guide patient education and support.

ObjectivesThree-drug nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis (NPEP) typically includes co-formulated emtricitabine-tenofovir (FTC-TDF) and a protease inhibitor. However, protease inhibitors can cause significant toxicities, can interact with prescribed and illicit drugs, and work late in the viral cycle. Agents that act before viral integration into host DNA may have efficacy advantages. Raltegravir (RAL) is a good candidate for NPEP as it has few side effects or drug interactions and acts prior to HIV integration. The objective of this study was to investigate the use of RAL in 3-drug NPEP in terms of safety, adherence and tolerability. MethodsWe evaluated 28 days of RAL-FTC-TDF treatment in 86 men and FTC-TDF treatment in 34 men eligible for three-and two-drug NPEP, respectively. We assessed adherence (compared between groups and with nonstudy controls) and clinical and adverse events at weeks 1, 2 and 4, and efficacy at week 12. Analyses were by intention to treat, excluding from the adherence analysis subjects who ceased NPEP because their source was HIV-uninfected. ResultsNo participant became infected with HIV. For RAL-FTC-TDF and FTC-TDF, regimen completion rates were 92% and 91% and medication adherence rates were 89% and 90%, respectively. Eight (9%) RAL recipients developed mild myalgias, with four developing transient grade 4 elevations in creatine kinase (two developed both), all of which improved to grade 2 or less by week 4 without RAL discontinuation. Eight prescribed and 37 potential illicit drug interactions with a protease inhibitor were avoided by use of RAL. ConclusionsRAL-FTC-TDF is well tolerated as NPEP, results in high levels of adherence and avoids potential drug−drug interactions. Patients and clinicians should be aware of the potential for acute muscle toxicity when RAL is used as NPEP. ORIGINAL RESEARCH13 randomized study of ART as pre-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men (MSM); and a randomized trial of ART as prevention in HIV-serodiscordant, heterosexual couples [5][6][7][8][9]. PEP does not always prevent HIV transmission [10][11][12]. Longer time to first PEP dose, incomplete PEP adherence, continued HIV risk behaviour and primary ART drug resistance have each been linked to failure [11,12]. In seven PEP studies published since 2001, 51% of the total 1009 participants reported at least one adverse event (AE) and around 20% failed to complete the 28-day course [13][14][15][16][17][18][19].The use of three antiretroviral agents in PEP is common [1-4] but based solely on standard-of-care treatment of HIV infection. The most commonly used third drug is a protease inhibitor [1][2][3][4]. Protease inhibitors prevent mature HIV protein formation within cells in which HIV is already integrated into host-cell DNA. Agents that act before viral integration may have efficacy advantages by preventing rather than limiting infection. In addition, some prescribed and proscribed drugs have potentially dangerous interactions with protease inhibitors.Raltegravir (RAL) is an HIV inte...