The three human ␤-defensins, HBD1-3, are 33-47-residue, cationic antimicrobial proteins expressed by epithelial cells. All three proteins have broad spectrum antimicrobial activity, with HBD3 consistently being the most potent. Additionally, HBD3 has significant bactericidal activity against Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus at physiological salt concentrations. We have compared the multimeric state of the three ␤-defensins using NMR diffusion spectroscopy, dynamic and static light scattering, and analysis of the migration of the three ␤-defensins on a native gel. All three techniques are in agreement, suggesting that HBD-3 is a dimer, while HBD-1 and HBD-2 are monomeric. Subsequently, the NMR solution structures of HBD1 and HBD3 were determined using standard homonuclear techniques and compared with the previously determined solution structure of HBD2. Both HBD1 and HBD3 form well defined structures with backbone root mean square deviations of 0.451 and 0.616 Å, respectively. The tertiary structures of all three ␤-defensins are similar, with a short helical segment preceding a three-stranded antiparallel ␤-sheet. The surface charge density of each of the defensins is markedly different, with the surface of HBD3 significantly more basic. Analysis of the NMR data and structures led us to suggest that HBD3 forms a symmetrical dimer through strand ␤2 of the ␤-sheet. The increased anti-Staphylococcal activity of HBD3 may be explained by the capacity of the protein to form dimers in solution at low concentrations, an amphipathic dimer structure, and the increased positive surface charge compared with HBD1 and HBD2.Antimicrobial peptides have been shown to be key elements in the innate immune system of many organisms, presenting the first line of defense against invading microbes. In many vertebrates the primary family of antimicrobial peptides are the defensins, produced in neutrophils and epithelial cells (1, 2), although related proteins are also found in insects and plants (2, 3). Defensins are small, 3-5 kDa cationic proteins constrained by three disulfide bonds. As a class of proteins, they have broad microbicidal activity against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, yeast, and some enveloped viruses, although specific defensin peptides often have defined spectra of activity (2). Like many other antimicrobial peptides (4), the defensin class of peptides is known to disrupt the membranes of microbes (5-7). It has recently been reported that in addition to their antimicrobial activity, defensins may act as chemokines, activating the adaptive immune response (8 -10).The ␣-defensins were the first characterized human defensins (11), including the human neutrophil proteins HNP1-3, which are stored in neutrophil granules and are released after phagocytosis of an invading bacterium. The isolation of the inducible tracheal antimicrobial protein from epithelial cells (12) and the subsequent discovery of 13 peptides stored in the granules of bovine neutrophils (13) represented a second class of defensins termed the ␤-d...

Human beta-defensin-2 (HBD-2) is a member of the defensin family of antimicrobial peptides. HBD-2 was first isolated from inflamed skin where it is posited to participate in the killing of invasive bacteria and in the recruitment of cells of the adaptive immune response. Static light scattering and two-dimensional proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy have been used to assess the physical state and structure of HBD-2 in solution. At concentrations of < or = 2.4 mM, HBD-2 is monomeric. The structure is amphiphilic with a nonuniform surface distribution of positive charge and contains several key structural elements, including a triple-stranded, antiparallel beta-sheet with strands 2 and 3 in a beta-hairpin conformation. A beta-bulge in the second strand occurs at Gly28, a position conserved in the entire defensin family. In solution, HBD-2 exhibits an alpha-helical segment near the N-terminus that has not been previously ascribed to solution structures of alpha-defensins or to the beta-defensin BNBD-12. This novel structural element may be a factor contributing to the specific microbicidal or chemokine-like properties of HBD-2.

Integral membrane proteins carry out some of the most important functions of living cells, yet relatively few details are known about their structures. This is due, in large part, to the difficulties associated with preparing membrane protein crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis. Mechanistic studies of membrane protein crystallization may provide insights that will aid in determining future membrane protein structures. Accordingly, the solution behavior of the bacterial outer membrane protein OmpF porin was studied by static light scattering under conditions favorable for crystal growth. The second osmotic virial coefficient~B 22 ! was found to be a predictor of the crystallization behavior of porin, as has previously been found for soluble proteins. Both tetragonal and trigonal porin crystals were found to form only within a narrow window of B 22 values located at approximately Ϫ0.5 to Ϫ2 ϫ 10 Ϫ4 mol mL g Ϫ2 , which is similar to the "crystallization slot" observed for soluble proteins. The B 22 behavior of protein-free detergent micelles proved very similar to that of porin-detergent complexes, suggesting that the detergent's contribution dominates the behavior of protein-detergent complexes under crystallizing conditions. This observation implies that, for any given detergent, it may be possible to construct membrane protein crystallization screens of general utility by manipulating the solution properties so as to drive detergent B 22 values into the crystallization slot. Such screens would limit the screening effort to the detergent systems most likely to yield crystals, thereby minimizing protein requirements and improving productivity.Keywords: cloud point; membrane protein crystallization; porin; protein-detergent complex; second osmotic virial coefficient; static light scattering Knowledge of a protein's three-dimensional~3D! structure is critical for any thorough understanding of its function. Consequently, much effort has been devoted to the problem of structure determination, and the number of proteins of known structure has grown explosively in the past several decades. Now that complete genomic sequences are becoming available for many organisms, structural biologists are redoubling their efforts and are crafting structural proteomics initiatives aimed at keeping pace with the flood of sequence information~Terwilliger et al., 1998!. However, the explosion in our knowledge of protein structure has not extended to integral membrane proteins. Even though 20-30% of the open reading frames found in a genome are likely to encode membranebound proteins~Wallin & von Heijne, 1998!, far fewer than 1% of the structures found in the Protein Data Bank represent membrane proteins. This disparity persists despite tremendous interest in membrane protein structure, fueled by the critical biological functions of these molecules and by their importance as drug targets.The relative lack of information about membrane protein structure can be traced directly to the technical difficulties associated w...

No abstract

No abstract