Due to increasing use of allografts from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors, we evaluated DCD liver transplants and impact of recipient and donor factors on graft survival. Liver transplants from DCD donors reported to UNOS were analyzed against donation after brain death (DBD) donor liver transplants performed between 1996 and 2003. We defined a recipient cumulative relative risk (RCRR) using significant risk factors identified from a Cox regression analysis: age; medical condition at transplantation; regraft status; dialysis received and serum creatinine. Graft survival from DCD donors (71% at 1 year and 60% at 3 years) were significantly inferior to DBD donors (80% at 1 year and 72% at 3 years, p < 0.001). Low-risk recipients (RCRR ≤ 1.5) with low-risk DCD livers (DWIT < 30 min and CIT < 10 h, n = 226) achieved graft survival rates (81% and 67% at 1 and 3 years, respectively) not significantly different from recipients with DBD allografts (80% and 72% at 1 and 3 years, respectively, log-rank p = 0.23). Liver allografts from DCD donors may be used to increase the cadaveric donor pool, with favorable graft survival rates achieved when low-risk grafts are transplanted in a low-risk setting. Whether transplantation of these organs in low-risk recipients provides a survival benefit compared to the waiting list is unknown.

No abstract

It is not well understood whether posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) alters postoperative morbidity. This study was designed to evaluate this question. All adult patients who received an OLTx between July 1985 and March 1993 (n = 497) were evaluated by retrospective chart review for evidence of PTDM after OLTx. The patients identified with PTDM (n = 26) were case matched with nondiabetic OLTx recipients based on primary liver disease diagnosis, age, gender, date of first OLTx, and survival. Liver synthetic function, number and severity of rejection episodes, graft survival, total number of hospital days within the first year post-OLTx, renal function, and number and type of infection episodes were analyzed to assess differences in morbidity between the PTDM and control patients after OLTx. Of the 497 adult patients who underwent OLTx, 26 (5.2%) were identified as having PTDM within 1 month of discharge. Factors which identified individuals at mmunosuppression has allowed solid organ trans-I plantation to succeed but not without morbidity, including insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus (DM) associated with immunosuppression protocols. The development of DM after solid organ transplantation was first described by Starz12 in 1964 in renal transplant recipients. Posttransplantation DM (PTDM) is estimated to occur in 10% to 46% of all ludney3-'j and 9% to 21% of all liver transplant patients7-I2 The pathogenesis of PTDM is believed to be multifactorial. High-dose prednisone increases peripheral tissue higher risk for DM after OLTx included higher pre-OLTx fasting blood glucose (P = .04); lower body mass index after OLTx (P = .02); and cyclosporine rather than OKT3 induction (P = .009).Graft survival, synthetic function, and the total number of rejection episodes during the first year were not different between the two groups. The morbidity variables of total number of days in the hospital during the first 12 months, renal function, and type and number of infections were also similar between the two groups. In summary, 5.2% of adult patients developed DM within 1 month of OLTx. Pre-existing insulin resistance, postoperative stress, and immunosuppression medications all likely contribute to the development of overt hyperglycemia after OLTx. Although PTDM can be a consequence of OLTx, it does not have a significant impact on patient outcome in the first year after OLTx.

No abstract

Cytomegalovirus is the single most important pathogen in clinical transplantation. Although much progress has been made in our understanding of the molecular biology and epidemiology of CMV infection and in our ability to diagnosis and treat CMV disease, it remains a major cause of morbidity but is no longer a major cause of mortality after liver transplantation. Risk factors for CMV disease after liver transplantation include donor and recipient serologic status, the use of antilymphocyte therapy, and retransplantation. CMV disease occurs early after transplantation, and the most frequent site of disease is the hepatic allograft. We have treated 79 patients with intravenous ganciclovir, with ultimate control of disease achieved in 69 patients (87.3%). Preliminary results using intravenous immunoglobulin and oral acyclovir for CMV prophylaxis in high-risk patients have been encouraging. In addition to producing clinical syndromes. CMV may have direct immunologic effects and is a marker of the net state of immunosuppression.

The treatment of chronic hepatitis C has been a challenge to most hepatologists and gastroenterologists. Approximately half of the patients demonstrate a response at the end of treatment with standard interferon (IFN) therapy. Of these responders, only half will eventually have sustained responses 6 months after the end of treatment. 1-3 There appear to be 2 challenges to achieving responses to IFN therapy in hepatitis C virus (HCV). The first is to initiate an antiviral response, and the second is to maintain the response after therapy and prevent a relapse. Longer IFN treatment durations, i.e., 12 to 18 months rather than 6 months, increases the chance of a sustained response. 4 However, the former issue of how to increase the initial response rate has not been resolved, although ''induction'' therapy may enhance initial IFN responsiveness. The issue of initial response rate is further complicated by the phenomenon of breakthroughs. A breakthrough occurs when a patient achieves a response while on IFN therapy and then loses the response despite continued IFN therapy. Breakthroughs have largely been defined by a transient normalization of alanine transaminase (ALT) values, because ALT has been the primary measure of efficacy in most HCV clinical trials. However, sensitive assays to measure HCV RNA have now become the standard in assessment of efficacy. Thus, patients could have either an ALT breakthrough or an HCV-RNA breakthrough. The latter would be a transient undetectable serum HCV-RNA value that returns to detectable levels during continued IFN Abbreviations: IFN, interferon; HCV, hepatitis C virus; ALT, alanine transaminase; CIFN, consensus interferon.From the

No abstract

Bile acid metabolism and biliary secretion were characterized in the first 2 wk after orthotopic liver transplantation in 15 patients receiving cyclosporine and in five patients receiving FK 506. Analyses were performed on hepatic bile obtained by T-tube drainage; values obtained were compared with literature values for bile samples obtained in patients who had undergone cholecystectomy. Biliary bile acid output, which is equivalent to bile acid biosynthesis from cholesterol, was low (mean +/- S.E.M.) and increased with time: day 1, 0.50 +/- 0.1 mmol/day; day 3, 0.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/day; and day 6, 1.6 +/- 0.5 mmol/day. Chenodeoxycholic acid biosynthesis, as percent of total bile acid biosynthesis, was abnormally low in patients receiving cyclosporine (16.2 +/- 1.1) but not in patients receiving FK 506 (38.2 +/- 4.8) (p < 0.005). Before the T-tube was clamped, the proportion of deoxycholic acid (a secondary bile acid formed by bacterial 7-dehydroxylation of cholic acid) was low in both groups: cyclosporine, 0.4 +/- 0.1; FK 506, 4.8 +/- 2.5 (p < 0.01). The mean concentration of bile acids in hepatic bile between days 4 and 11 did not differ significantly between groups: cyclosporine, 7.7 +/- 1.3 mmol/L; FK 506 4.3 +/- 0.7 mmol/L (mean +/- S.E.M.). (These values are similar to those reported for patients who have undergone cholecystectomy.) Bile acid-dependent bile flow, expressed as apparent choleretic activity (microliters of bile per micromole of bile acid output), was markedly elevated: in patients receiving cyclosporine the value was 129, and in patients receiving FK 506 the value was 220. (In patients who have undergone cholecystectomy, this value is less than 30).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)