Implication By understanding Matrix Metalloprotease (MMP) dysregulation from a pan-cancer perspective, this study sheds light on the diagnostic potentials of MMPs across multiple neoplasms. Background MMPs are intriguing genes related to cancer disease progression, functional promotion of angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis, and avoidance of immune surveillance. Many studies have noted these genes are frequently upregulated in cancer. However, expression patterns of all MMPs and their diagnostic and prognostic potential have not been investigated in a pan-cancer perspective. Methods The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data were used to evaluate diagnostic and prognostic potential of 24 MMPs in fifteen different cancer types. Gene expression measured by RNA-seq was analyzed by differential expression, hierarchical clustering, and ROC analysis for individual genes and in combination. Results MMP1, MMP9 , MMP10 , MMP11 , and MMP13 were almost universally upregulated across all cancers, with significant ( p < 0.05) fold change (FC > 2) in ten of fifteen cancers. MMP3 , MMP7 , MMP12 and MMP14 ) are significantly up-regulated in at least 10 cancer types. Interestingly, MMP2 , MMP7 , MMP23B , MMP27 and MMP28 ) are significantly down-regulated in seven to nine cancer types. Multiple MMPs possess AUC’s > 0.9 in more than one cancer. However, survival analyses suggest that the prognostic value of MMPs is limited to clear cell renal carcinoma. Conclusions Most MMPs have consistently increased gene expression across cancers, while several MMPs have consistently decreased expression in several cancer types. Many MMPs have diagnostic value individually or in combination, while the prognostic value of MMPs is restricted to one subtype of kidney cancer. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5768-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Postgrafting cyclosporine (CSP) given for 35 days resulted in establishment of stable marrow grafts from DLA-identical canine littermates after otherwise suboptimal, but nevertheless, lethal conditioning with 450 cGy of total body irradiation (TBI). We now asked whether sustained allografts could be achieved after sublethal TBI or without TBI. Five groups of recipients were studied. Dogs in group 1 were given 200 cGy TBI and postgrafting CSP, 15 mg/kg twice daily by mouth on days −1 to 35 posttransplant. Dogs in group 2 were given 200 cGy TBI and methotrexate (MTX), 0.4 mg/kg intravenously (IV) on days 1, 3, 6, and 11 along with CSP. Dogs in group 3 were given 200 cGy TBI and CSP along with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF ), 10mg/kg twice daily subcutaneously (SC) on days 0 to 27 after transplant, a novel immunosuppressive combination. Dogs in group 4 were given 100 cGy TBI and MMF/CSP. Dogs in group 5 were not given TBI and they received MMF/CSP posttransplant. Allografts were assessed by (Ca)n dinucleotide repeat polymorphism studies in cells from peripheral blood, lymph nodes, and marrow. Dogs in group 1 had transient mixed donor-host hematopoietic chimerism for no more than 4 weeks. Three of six dogs in group 2 had transient mixed chimerism for 3 to 11 weeks, and three have remained stable mixed chimeras for up to 60 weeks now. Four of five dogs in group 3 have remained stable mixed chimeras for 54 to 57 weeks now, while one lost the allograft after 12 weeks. All dogs in groups 4 and 5 rejected their allografts after 2 to 12 weeks. In summary, the establishment of stable mixed hematopoietic chimerism following nonmyelosuppressive and nontoxic conditioning programs has remained a difficult goal. Here we present evidence in a large random-bred animal species that this goal may be achievable with pharmacological immunosuppression postgrafting, capable of inhibiting both host-versus-graft (HVG) and graft-versus-host (GVH) reactions in the setting of DLA-identical grafts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.