In three experiments, we examined why some idioms can be lexically altered and still retain their figurative meanings (e.g., John buttoned his lips about Mary can be changed into John fastened his lips about Mary and still mean "John didn't say anything about Mary"), whereas other idioms cannot be lexically altered without losing their figurative meanings (e.g., John kicked the bucket, meaning "John died," loses its idiomatic meaning when changed into John kicked the pail). Our hypothesis was that the lexical flexibility of idioms is determined by speakers' assumptions about the ways in which parts of idioms contribute to their figurative interpretations as a whole. The results of the three experiments indicated that idioms whose individual semantic components contribute to their overall figurative meanings (e.g., go out on a limb) were judged as less disrupted by changes in their lexical items (e.g., go out on a branch) than were nondecomposable idioms (e.g., kick the bucket) when their individual words were altered (e.g., punt the pail). These findings lend support to the idea that both the syntactic productivity and the lexical makeup of idioms are matters of degree, depending on the idioms' compositional properties. This conclusion suggests that idioms do not form a unique class of linguistic items, but share many of the properties of more literal language.Idiomatic phrases in English differ in the degree to which their lexical items can be changed and still maintain their figurative meanings. For example, the word button in the idiomatic phrase button your lip (meaning ••don't say anything") can be changed to fasten your lips without disrupting the figurative meaning of the expression. Similarly, the phrase eat one's words can have its verb changed without disrupting its overall figurative interpretation (i.e., swallow one's words). Idioms such as button your lips and eat one's words seem to be lexically flexible, in that their individual components can be altered without significant damage to their nonliteral meanings. Other idiomatic phrases seem to be lexically frozen, in that changing any of their individual components severely disrupts their figurative meanings. For instance, speakers can say kick the bucket to mean "die," but they cannot say kick the pail or even punt the bucket without losing the idiomatic sense of the expression.Our purpose in this paper is to present evidence in support of a hypothesis explaining exactly why some idioms are lexically flexible and others are not. We suggest that the lexical flexibility of idioms is not an arbitrary phenomenon, but depends specifically on how the internal semantics of these phrases relate to their overall figurative interpretations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.