In a multi-center collaboration, we carried out T-replete, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplants from related, HLA-haploidentical donors with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (Cy) as GvHD prophylaxis in 55 patients with high-risk hematologic disorders. Patients received 2 doses of Cy 50mg/kg IV on days 3 and 4 post-infusion of PBSC (mean 6.4×106/kg CD34+ cells, mean 2.0 ×108/kg CD3+ cells). The median times to neutrophil (500/mcL) and platelet (>20,000/mcL) recovery were 17 and 21 days respectively. All but two of the patients achieved full engraftment. The one-year cumulative incidences of grade II and grade III acute GVHD were 53% and 8% respectively. There were no cases of grade IV GvHD. The two-year cumulative incidence of chronic GHVD was 18%. With a median follow up of 509 days, overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) at two years were 48% and 51%, respectively. The two-year cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse were 23% and 28% respectively. Our results suggest that PBSC can be substituted safely and effectively for bone marrow (BM) as the graft source for haploidentical transplantation following reduced intensity conditioning.

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are important in the support of hematopoiesis. In this pilot study, we evaluated the safety and efficiency of donor-expanded MSC infusion after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in six patients with poor hematopoietic recovery. MSCs were infused without HSC and without conditioning at a dose of 1 x 10(6)/kg weight. Two patients displayed rapid hematopoietic recovery (days 12 and 21), and four patients showed no response. The two patients who showed hematopoietic recovery were in first complete remission (CR1) compared to the other heavily pretreated patients. There were no toxic side effects linked to MSC infusion. One patient developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation 12 days following the MSC infusion and died from CMV disease. We found that infusion of MSCs without HSC co-infusion can restore medullary function in some patients with poor hematopoietic recovery. Our data suggest that patients with a less damaged stroma could benefit from this approach.

High-dose cyclophosphamide given early after allogeneic hemopoietic cell transplantation has been shown to be effective prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the setting of HLA-matched myeloablative bone marrow grafts, allowing avoidance of long-term immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors in some patients. Whether this approach is feasible using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell grafts is unknown. We conducted an exploratory phase 2 trial of cyclophosphamide given at 50 mg/kg i.v. on days 3 and 4 after transplantation as sole GVHD prophylaxis in recipients of G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell grafts from HLA-matched related or unrelated donors after reduced-intensity conditioning therapy with fludarabine, carmustine, and melphalan. Five patients, ages 52 to 67 years, with high-risk hematologic malignancies were enrolled. Four of the 5 developed severe acute GVHD of grades 3 to 4, requiring treatment with methylprednisolone and cyclosporine; 3 were steroid refractory and were given salvage therapy. One of these 4 patients died of hepatic GVHD, one died of sepsis, and 2 survived. We conclude that post-transplantation cyclophosphamide is inadequate as sole GVHD prophylaxis in the context of peripheral blood reduced-intensity conditioning transplantations from HLA-matched donors. This trial is registered at ACTRN12613001154796.

Our PCR-guided and rituximab-based preemptive approach to avoid PTLD after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is feasible but probably overtreated patients. Prospective trials are strongly needed, they should use uniform PCR techniques and consider higher threshold values for treatment initiation.

Four hundred and twenty-one adult allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) survivors participated in a cross-sectional study to assess sexual dysfunction and infertility post-transplant. Survey instruments included the Sydney Post-Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) Survey, Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment (FACT) -BMT, the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales (DASS 21), the Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) Activity Assessment-Patient Self Report (Form B), the Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale and The Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory. Most HSCT survivors reported sexual difficulties (51% of males; 66% of females). Men reported erectile dysfunction (79%) and decreased libido (616%) and women reported loss of libido (83%), painful intercourse (73%) and less enjoyment of sex (68%). Women also commonly reported vaginal dryness (73%), vaginal narrowing (34%) and vaginal irritation (26%). Woman had much higher rates of genital cGvHD than men (22% vs. 5%). Age and cGVHD were significantly associated with sexual dysfunction. 2Few survivors had children following transplant (33%). However, for those of reproductive age at HSCT, 22% reported trying to conceive, with 103% reporting success. This study is the largest to date exploring sexual function in survivors of allo-HSCT. These data provides the basis for health service reform to better meet the needs of HSCT survivors, including evidence to support counselling and education both pre-and post-transplant.

HSCT has a profound and pervasive impact on the life of survivors-reducing their horizons and shrinking various parts of their worlds. While HSCT survivors can describe the ways in which their life has changed, many of their fears, anxieties, regrets and concerns are existential in nature and are ill-defined-making it exceeding unlikely that they would be adequately captured by standard psychometric measures of QoL post HSCT.

We compared outcomes for 2 retrospective cohorts of patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) therapy transplants using haploidentical related donors and post-transplant prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with high-dose cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate. The first cohort of 13 was transplanted with bone marrow (BM) as the stem cell source, whereas the second cohort of 23 used peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The BM cohort received a single 60-mg/kg dose of cyclophosphamide on day +3, whereas the PBSC cohort received 2 doses on days +3 and +4. Patients in the first cohort were slightly older and had a higher proportion of acute myeloid leukemia, but there were no differences in the distribution of Disease Risk Index scores between the 2 groups. Patients in the PBSC group received double the number of CD34(+) cells in the stem cell graft. Times to neutrophil and platelet recovery were not different between the 2 groups. Three patients, all in the PBSC group, failed to engraft but recovered with autologous hemopoiesis and survived. The 6-month cumulative incidences of acute GVHD were 55.1% for BM and 48.5% for PBSCs (P = .651), whereas 24-month cumulative rates for chronic GHVD were 28.6% for BM and 32.3% for PBSCs (P = .685). Only 2 patients, both in the BM group, died of nonrelapse causes, both of second cancers. The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse were 43.9% for BM and 23.5% for PBSCs (P = .286). Overall survival at 2 years was significantly better for PBSC patients (P = .028), at 83.4% versus 52.7% for BM. Relapse-free and event-free survival did not differ significantly between BM and PBSC groups. In this retrospective analysis, we conclude that the use of PBSCs for haploidentical RIC transplants is a feasible strategy, with equivalent rates of acute and chronic GVHD and risk of relapse and low nonrelapse mortality compared with BM.

Allogeneic Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) survivors are at high risk of secondary cancers. Although current guidelines endorse survivors following Country‐specific general population screening recommendations to mitigate this risk, little is known about cancer screening adherence in Australian BMT survivors. We conducted a cross‐sectional survey of 441 BMT survivors who were >1 year post transplant, to explore rates of screening for secondary cancers and to identify barriers to cancer screening recommendations. Survey instruments included the Sydney Post‐BMT Survey, FACT‐BMT, DASS 21, The Chronic Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD) Activity Assessment–Patient Self‐Report (Form B), the Lee Chronic GVHD Symptom Scale, Fear of Cancer Recurrence Scale, and The Post Traumatic Growth Inventory. Fifty‐seven percent of respondents were male, median age 54 years, and 40% were >6 years post‐BMT. Rates of cancer screening adherence were as follows: cervical 63.4%, breast 53.3%, skin 52.4%, and bowel 32.3%. Older BMT survivors and those >2 years post transplant were more likely to undergo cancer screening. Improved quality of life was associated with screening for skin, breast, and cervical cancer. Fear of cancer recurrence negatively impacted on cervical screening. For those who had not undergone screening, the majority reported not being advised to do so by their treatment team. This study is the largest and most comprehensive to date exploring cancer screening adherence in BMT survivors in Australia. These data provide the basis for health service reform to better meet the needs of BMT survivors and provide evidence to support counseling and education of both patients and professionals.