Safe and effective therapies are urgently needed to treat polymyxinresistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections and suppress the emergence of resistance. We investigated the pharmacodynamics of polymyxin B, rifampin, and meropenem alone and as polymyxin B-based double and triple combinations against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. The rates and extents of killing with polymyxin B (1 to 128 mg/liter), rifampin (2 to 16 mg/liter), and meropenem (10 to 120 mg/liter) were evaluated against polymyxin B-susceptible (PB s ) and polymyxin B-resistant (PB r ) clinical isolates using 48-h static time-kill studies. Additionally, humanized triple-drug regimens of polymyxin B (concentration at steady state [C ss ] values of 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/liter), 600 mg rifampin every 12 or 8 h, and 1 or 2 g meropenem every 8 h dosed as an extended 3-h infusion were simulated over 48 h by using a one-compartment in vitro dynamic infection model. Serial bacterial counts were performed to quantify the pharmacodynamic effect. Population analysis profiles (PAPs) were used to assess the emergence of polymyxin B resistance. Monotherapy was ineffective against both isolates. Polymyxin B with rifampin demonstrated early bactericidal activity against the PB s isolate, followed by regrowth by 48 h. Bactericidal activity was sustained at all polymyxin B concentrations of Ն2 mg/liter in combination with meropenem. No two-drug combinations were effective against the PB r isolate, but all simulated triple-drug regimens showed early bactericidal activity against both strains by 8 h that was sustained over 48 h. PAPs did not reveal the emergence of resistant subpopulations. The triple-drug combination of polymyxin B, rifampin, and meropenem may be a viable consideration for the treatment of PB r KPC-producing K. pneumoniae infections. Further investigation is warranted to optimize triple-combination therapy.

Combination therapy provides a useful therapeutic approach to overcome resistance until new antibiotics become available. In this study, the pharmacodynamics, including the morphological effects, of polymyxin B (PMB) and meropenem alone and in combination against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates was examined. Ten clinical isolates were obtained from patients undergoing treatment for mediastinitis. KPCs were identified and MICs were measured using microbroth dilution. Time–kill studies were conducted over 24 h with PMB (0.5–16 mg/L) and meropenem (20–120 mg/L) alone or in combination against an initial inoculum of ca. 106 CFU/mL. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to analyse changes in bacterial morphology after treatment, and the log change method was used to quantify the pharmacodynamic effect. All isolates harboured the blaKPC-2 gene and were resistant to meropenem (MICs ≥8 mg/L). Clinically relevant PMB concentrations (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/L) in combination with meropenem were synergistic against all isolates except BRKP28 (polymyxin- and meropenem-resistant, both MICs >128 mg/L). All PMB and meropenem concentrations in combination were bactericidal against polymyxin-susceptible isolates with meropenem MICs ≤16 mg/L. SEM revealed extensive morphological changes following treatment with PMB in combination with meropenem compared with the changes observed with each individual agent. Additionally, morphological changes decreased with increasing resistance profiles of the isolate, i.e. increasing meropenem MIC. These antimicrobial effects may not only be a summation of the effects due to each antibiotic but also a result of differential action that likely inhibits protective mechanisms in bacteria.

The prevalence of heteroresistant Acinetobacter baumannii is increasing. Infections due to these resistant pathogens pose a global treatment challenge. Here, the pharmacodynamic activities of polymyxin B (PMB) (2–20 mg/L) and tigecycline (0.15–4 mg/L) were evaluated as monotherapy and in combination using a 4 × 4 concentration array against two carbapenem-resistant and polymyxin-heteroresistant A. baumannii isolates. Time Kill Experiments was employed at starting inocula of 106 and 108 CFU/mL over 48 h. Clinically relevant combinations of PMB (2 mg/L) and tigecycline (0.90 mg/L) resulted in greater reductions in the bacterial population compared with polymyxin alone by 8 h (ATCC 19606, −6.38 vs. −3.43 log10 CFU/mL; FADDI AB115, −1.38 vs. 2.08 log10 CFU/mL). At 10× the clinically achievable concentration (PMB 20 mg/L in combination with tigecycline 0.90 mg/L), there was bactericidal activity against FADDI AB115 by 4 h that was sustained until 32 h, and against ATCC 19606 that was sustained for 48 h. These studies show that aggressive polymyxin-based dosing in combination with clinically achievable tigecycline concentrations results in early synergistic activity that is not sustained beyond 8 h, whereas combinations with higher tigecycline concentrations result in sustained bactericidal activity against both isolates at both inocula. These results indicate a need for optimised front-loaded polymyxin-based combination regimens that utilise high polymyxin doses at the onset of treatment to achieve good pharmacodynamic activity whilst minimising adverse events.

Aims Transthyretin‐mediated amyloidosis is a progressive and fatal disease caused by the build‐up of misfolded transthyretin (TTR) protein. Eplontersen is a triantennary N‐acetyl galactosamine (GalNAc3)‐conjugated antisense oligonucleotide targeting TTR messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) to inhibit production of both variant and wild‐type TTR. We aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for eplontersen and to evaluate the impact of covariates on exposure and response. Methods Plasma eplontersen and serum TTR concentration data were obtained from two phase 1 studies in healthy volunteers (http://ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03728634, NCT04302064). Model development was conducted using a nonlinear mixed‐effects approach. Results Eplontersen PK was well described by a two‐compartment model. Evaluation of demographics identified significant covariates of lean body mass on clearance and body weight on intercompartmental clearance and volumes of distribution. Population PK modelling showed the absorption rate was 29.6% greater with injection into the abdomen versus the arm. The typical population terminal elimination half‐life was 25.5 days. Serum TTR was well described by an indirect response model with inhibition of TTR production by eplontersen. Maximum fractional inhibition (Imax) was 0.970 (0.549%RSE) and the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was 0.0283 ng/ml (13.3%RSE). Simulations showed subjects with lower weight had higher exposure (AUC, Cmax), while higher Cmax was observed when comparing site of administration (ratio abdomen/arm = 1.18), but differences in exposure did not significantly impact response at evaluated doses. Conclusion The exposure‐response relationship of eplontersen was well characterised by the PKPD model. Weight and injection site were found to affect systemic exposure, but this effect does not seem to result in clinically relevant variation in response.

ZTI-01 (fosfomycin for injection) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic with a novel mechanism of action and is currently under development in the United States for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. Globally, fosfomycin and polymyxin B are increasingly being used to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. The objectives were to evaluate the pharmacodynamic activity of polymyxin B and fosfomycin alone and in combination against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and to assess the rate and extent of emergence of resistance to different antibiotic regimens. Two clinical isolates, BRKP26 (MIC of polymyxin B[MICPMB], 0.5 mg/liter; MIC of fosfomycin [MICFOF], 32 mg/liter) and BRKP67 (MICPMB, 8 mg/liter; MICFOF, 32 mg/liter) at an initial inoculum of 107 CFU/ml, were evaluated over 168 h in a hollow-fiber infection model simulating clinically relevant polymyxin B (2.5-mg/kg loading dose as a 2 h-infusion followed by 1.5-mg/kg dose every 12 h [q12h] as a 1-h infusion) and fosfomycin (6 g q6h as a 1-h or 3-h infusion) regimens alone and in combination. Population analysis profiles (PAPs) and MIC testing were performed to assess emergence of resistance. Polymyxin B or fosfomycin monotherapy was ineffective and selected for resistance by 24 h. Polymyxin B plus a fosfomycin 1-h infusion demonstrated sustained bactericidal activity by 4 h, with undetectable colony counts beyond 144 h. Polymyxin B plus a fosfomycin 3-h infusion demonstrated bactericidal activity at 4 h, followed by regrowth similar to that of the control by 144 h. PAPs revealed resistant subpopulations by 120 h. The combination of polymyxin B and a fosfomycin 1-h infusion is a promising treatment option for KPC-producing K. pneumoniae and suppresses the emergence of resistance. Further evaluation of novel dosing strategies is warranted to optimize therapy.