One of the most important and challenging goals in drug delivery is overcoming the poor oral absorption of high-value therapeutics that include peptides. Gastrointestinal Permeation Enhancement Technology (GIPET) attempts to address this question by safely delivering drugs across the small intestine in therapeutically relevant concentrations. GIPET is based primarily on promoting drug absorption through the use of medium-chain fatty acids, medium-chain fatty acid derivatives and microemulsion systems based on medium-chain fatty acid glycerides formulated in enteric-coated tablets or capsules. Importantly, these excipients are generally regarded as safe and the systems are formulated in such a way that there is no change in chemical composition of the active ingredient. More than 300 volunteers have been administered GIPET formulations in 16 Phase I studies of 6 separate drugs comprising both single- and repeat-dosing regimes. Oral bioavailability of alendronate, desmopressin and low-molecular-weight heparin in humans was increased using GIPET formulations compared with unformulated controls. GIPET was well tolerated by human subjects. Using fluxes of markers of epithelial permeability, the effects of GIPET on the human intestine were shown to be rapid, short-lived and reversible in vivo. These data suggest that GIPET formulations have genuine potential as a platform technology for safe and effective oral drug delivery of a wide range of poorly permeable drugs.
SCI impacts significantly on the QOL of family caregivers, with major implications for physical, mental and social aspects of caregiver health. This review highlights that these important issues are problematic internationally and may persist over several decades. The need for focused interventions to support family caregivers of spinal cord injured persons, with particular emphasis on increasing patient/family education and access to support groups, is recommended.
Objective
Screening asymptomatic men for prostate cancer is controversial and informed decision making is recommended. Within two prostate cancer screening programs, we evaluated the impact of a print-based decision aid (DA) on decision-making outcomes.
Methods
Men (N=543) were 54.9 (SD=8.1) years old and 61% were African-American. The 2 (booklet type: DA vs. usual care (UC)) × 2 (delivery mode: Home vs. Clinic) randomized controlled trial assessed decisional and screening outcomes at baseline, two-months, and 13-months.
Results
Intention-to-treat linear regression analyses using generalized estimating equations revealed that DA participants reported improved knowledge relative to UC (B=.41, p<.05). For decisional conflict, per-protocol analyses revealed a group by time interaction (B = −.69, p<.05), indicating that DA participants were less likely to report decisional conflict at two-months compared to UC participants (OR=.49, 95% CI: .26–.91, p<.05).
Conclusion
This is the first randomized trial to evaluate a DA in the context of free mass screening, a challenging setting in which to make an informed decision. The DA was highly utilized by participants, improved knowledge and reduced decisional conflict.
Practice implications
These results are valuable in understanding ways to improve the decisions of men who seek screening and can be easily implemented within many settings.
The collection and preparation of four lake and four stream sediment reference materials are described. Provisional values related to both total concentrations and concentrations derived from partial extraction procedures are presented for major, minor and trace element constituents. As large amounts of samples (160–200 kg) have been prepared, they should be of interest to soil analysts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.