Using the principles of sternal wound debridement and early flap coverage, the authors have achieved a significant reduction in mortality after sternal wound infection and have reduced the mean hospital stay after sternal wound closure of these critically ill patients. Further reductions in mortality will depend on earlier detection of mediastinitis, before onset of septicemia, and ongoing improvements in the critical care of patients with multisystem organ failure.

No abstract

Recent trends in breast reconstruction have transitioned toward the skin-sparing type of mastectomy and immediate reconstruction using autologous tissue. This study was designed to document trends in the management of patients with unilateral breast cancer and to determine how they influence management of the contralateral breast. All patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction at Emory University Hospitals from January of 1975 to December of 1999 were reviewed. The cohort was stratified by timing of reconstruction (immediate versus delayed), method of reconstruction, and mastectomy type (skin-sparing versus non-skin-sparing). The methods of reconstruction included implant, latissimus dorsi flap, and transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Contralateral procedures to achieve symmetry included augmentation, mastopexy, augmentation/mastopexy, and reduction. A total of 1394 patients were evaluated, including 689 delayed and 705 immediate reconstructions. Sixty-seven percent of delayed-reconstruction patients (462 of 689) had a symmetry procedure performed on the opposite breast, compared with 22 percent for the immediate-reconstruction patients (155 of 705) (p

This study provides a retrospective analysis of 60 patients who underwent thoracic reconstruction with the omentum. Patients were identified by searching several databases to determine demographics, indications for surgery, operative technique, and postoperative course, including donor and recipient site morbidity. From January 1975 to May 2000, the authors harvested and transferred the omentum successfully (57 pedicled, 3 free) in 60 patients (mean age, 60 years; age range, 21-86 years) for sternal wound infections (N = 34), chest wall resections (N = 17), pectus deformities (N = 2), intrathoracic defects (N = 4), and breast reconstruction (N = 3). The omentum was used as a primary flap in 39 patients and as a salvage flap in 21 patients. Average operative time was 3.9 hours and average hospital stay was 34.3 days. Partial flap loss occurred in 7 patients, with no total flap failures. Morbidity included six abdominal wound infections and seven epigastric hernias. Mortality was 11.7%. The omentum can be harvested safely and used reliably to reconstruct varying thoracic wounds and defects. Specific indications from this series include osteoradionecrosis, chest wall tumors, massive sternal wounds, and refractory mediastinitis. Hultman CS, Culbertson JH, Jones GE, et al. Thoracic reconstruction with the omentum: indications, complications, and results.

The omentum can be safely harvested and reliably used to reconstruct a diverse range of extraperitoneal wounds and defects. Donor-site complications can be significant but are usually limited to abdominal wall infection and hernia. Risk factors associated with complications include the use of pedicled flaps, mediastinitis, and pulmonary failure. This low rate of donor-site complications strongly supports the use of the omentum in the reconstruction of complex wounds and defects.

The omental free flap has acceptable abdominal morbidity and provides sufficient soft tissue coverage with a 96.4% survival. The thickness \and versatility of omentum provide sufficient contour molding for craniofacial reconstruction. It is an attractive alternative for reconstruction of large scalp defects and badly irradiated tissue.

Management of infected vascular grafts remains a challenging problem. Muscle flap coverage should have a high priority, as the chance of a good outcome is highly favorable in early infections.

Post mastectomy breast reconstruction continues to evolve in both timing and technique; however, multiple surgical procedures are usually required. The purpose of this report was to determine the number of secondary procedures required to complete the breast reconstruction and factors that influence this process. All patients who underwent breast reconstruction at Emory University Hospital between 1975 and 2000 were reviewed. The end point and inclusion criterion was completion to nipple reconstruction. Secondary procedures were determined per patient for either unilateral or bilateral reconstructions, and defined as any surgical manipulation of the reconstructed breast, contralateral breast, or donor site. The cohort was stratified by timing and method of reconstruction. Additional variables included risk factors, radiation therapy, and complications. A total of 888 patients completed the reconstructive process (738 unilateral and 150 bilateral). The average number of secondary procedures was 3.99 for unilateral, and 5.54 for bilateral. Delayed reconstructions had a higher number of secondary procedures in both groups. Transverse rectus abdominus musculocutaneous flap reconstruction tended to have more secondary procedures than implant or latissimus dorsi with or without implant reconstructions. Radiation therapy increased the number of secondary procedures in unilateral (3.9 versus 4.6, P < 0.001) and in bilateral reconstructions (5.7 versus 6.4, P = 0.032). The number of secondary procedures also increased exponentially with the number of risk factors (0-4), and patients with any complication had a higher number of secondary procedures for unilateral (4.5 versus 3.6, P < 0.001) and bilateral reconstructions (6.4 versus 4.5, P < 0.001). Secondary breast and donor site procedures were used as an outcome measure to formulate comparisons. Autologous tissue reconstruction required more secondary procedures, likely in part to donor site revisions. Delayed reconstruction, the need for radiation therapy, any complication, and more risk factors significantly increased the number of secondary procedures required to complete the reconstructive process.