The metabolic syndrome, manifested by insulin resistance, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, is conceived to increase the risk for coronary heart disease and type II diabetes. Several studies have used factor analysis to explore its underlying structure among related risk variables but reported different results. Taking a hypothesis-testing approach, this study used confirmatory factor analysis to specify and test the factor structure of the metabolic syndrome. A hierarchical four-factor model, with an overarching metabolic syndrome factor uniting the insulin resistance, obesity, lipid, and blood pressure factors, was proposed and tested with 847 men who participated in the Normative Aging Study between 1987 and 1991. Simultaneous multi-group analyses were also conducted to test the stability of the proposed model across younger and older participants and across individuals with and without cardiovascular disease. The findings demonstrated that the proposed structure was well supported (comparative fit index = 0.97, root mean square error approximation = 0.06) and stable across subgroups. The metabolic syndrome was represented primarily by the insulin resistance and obesity factors, followed by the lipid factor, and, to a lesser extent, the blood pressure factor. This study provides an empirical foundation for conceptualizing and measuring the metabolic syndrome that unites four related components (insulin resistance, obesity, lipids, and blood pressure).

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) provides a survival advantage over antiarrhythmic medications for patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. However, the effect of ICD therapy on quality-of-life and psychosocial functioning are not as well understood. Health care providers (e.g., physicians, nurses) can serve as a valuable source of information related to these ICD outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate health care provider perceptions regarding: (1) the quality-of-life and psychosocial functioning of their ICD recipients, (2) the concerns or problems reported by ICD recipients, and (3) the degree of provider comfort in managing these concerns. The final sample of health care providers (n = 261) rated ICD recipients' global quality-of-life and psychosocial functioning, and specific concerns about health care, lifestyle, special population adjustment, marital and family adjustment, and emotional well-being. With regard to quality-of-life, health care providers reported that the majority of ICD recipients were functioning better (38%) or about the same (47%) than before implantation. However, health care providers reported that 15% of recipients experienced worse quality-of-life postimplantation. Similarly, health care providers indicated that 10%-20% of ICD recipients experienced worse emotional functioning and strained family relationships. Moreover, issues related to driving, dealing with ICD shocks, and depression were the most common ICD recipient concerns. Significant differences were noted between physicians and nurses/other health care professionals on a wide range of psychosocial issues. Health care providers generally reported the most comfort dealing with traditional medical issues (i.e., patient adherence), and the least comfort in managing emotional well-being issues (e.g., depression and anxiety). These results suggest that routine attention to ICD quality-of-life and psychosocial outcomes is indicated for health care providers who care for ICD recipients.

Background Patients who have completed Phase II cardiac rehabilitation have low rates of maintenance of exercise after program completion, despite the importance of sustaining regular exercise to prevent future cardiac events. Purpose The efficacy of a home-based intervention to support exercise maintenance among patients who had completed Phase II cardiac rehabilitation versus contact control was evaluated. Design An RCT was used to evaluate the intervention. Data were collected in 2005–2010 and analyzed in 2010. Setting/participants One hundred and thirty patients (mean age = 63.6 years [SD=9.7], 20.8% female) were randomized to exercise counseling (Maintenance Counseling group, n=64) or contact control (Contact Control group, n=66). Intervention Maintenance Counseling group participants received a 6-month program of exercise counseling (based on the Transtheoretical Model and Social–Cognitive Theory) delivered via telephone, as well as print materials and feedback reports. Main outcome measures Assessments of physical activity (7-Day PAR), motivational readiness for exercise, lipids and physical functioning were conducted at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Objective accelerometer data were collected at the same time-points. Fitness was assessed via maximal exercise stress tests at baseline and 6 months. Results The Maintenance Counseling group reported significantly higher exercise participation than the Contact Control group at 12 months (difference of 80 minutes, 95% CI 22,137). Group differences in exercise at 6 months were nonsignificant. The intervention significantly increased the probability of participants’ exercising at or above physical activity guidelines and attenuated regression in motivational readiness versus the Contact Control Group at 6 and 12 months. Self-reported physical functioning was significantly higher in the Maintenance Counseling group at 12 months. No group differences were seen in fitness at 6 months or lipid measures at 6 and 12 months. Conclusions A telephone-based intervention can help maintain exercise, prevent regression in motivational readiness for exercise and improve physical functioning in this patient population.