To study the environment of a preprotein as it crosses the plasma membrane of Escherichia coli, unique cysteinyl residues were introduced into proOmpA and the genes for these mutant preproteins were fused to the gene of dihydrofolate reductase (Dhfr). A photoactivable, radiolabeled and reducible cross‐linker was then attached to the unique cysteinyl residue of each purified protein. Partially translocated polypeptides were generated and arrested in their membrane transit by the folded structure of the dihydrofolate reductase domain. After photolysis to label their nearest neighbors and reduction of the disulfide bond between proOmpA‐Dhfr and the cross‐linker, radiolabeled cross‐linker was selectively recovered with the SecA and SecY subunits of preprotein translocase. Strikingly, neither the SecE nor Band 1 subunits were cross‐linked to any of the constructs and the membrane phospholipids were almost entirely shielded from cross‐linking. The fact that SecY and SecA are the only membrane proteins cross‐linked to the translocating chains suggests that they may form an entirely proteinaceous pathway through which secreted proteins pass during membrane transit.

Precursor proteins are believed to have secondary and tertiary structure prior to translocation across the Escherichia coli plasma membrane. We now find that preprotein unfolding during translocation can be driven by the translocation event itself. At certain stages, translocation and unfolding can occur without exogenous energy input. To examine this unfolding reaction, we have prepared proOmpA‐Dhfr, a fusion protein of the well studied cytosolic enzyme dihydrofolate reductase (Dhfr) connected to the C‐terminus of proOmpA, the precursor form of outer membrane protein A. At an intermediate stage of its in vitro translocation, the N‐terminal proOmpA domain has crossed the membrane while the folded Dhfr portion, stabilized by its ligands NADPH and methotrexate, has not. When the ligands are removed from this intermediate, translocation occurs by a two‐step process. First, 20–30 amino acid residues of the fusion protein translocate concomitant with unfolding of the Dhfr domain. This reaction requires neither ATP, delta mu H+ nor the SecA subunit of translocase. Strikingly, this translocation accelerates the net unfolding of the Dhfr domain. In a second step, SecA and ATP hydrolysis drive the rapid completion of translocation. Thus energy derived from translocation can drive the unfolding of a substantial protein domain.

DsbC is a periplasmic protein of Escherichia coli that was previously identified by a genetic selection that rescued sensitivity to dithiothreitol in Tn10 mutagenized cells. The Erwinia chrysanthemi dsbC gene was identified in a previous genetic screen to restore motility in a dsbA null strain. In order to analyze the biochemical role of E. coli DsbC, the protein was overexpressed, purified, and compared with DsbA in terms of disulfide isomerization, thiol oxidation, and in vivo redox state. In vitro, DsbC and DsbA have an equivalent kcat for disulfide isomerization with the model substrate, misfolded insulin-like growth factor-1. However, DsbA is a more effective oxidant than DsbC of protein dithiols. In vivo, DsbA is found exclusively in the oxidized state in wild-type strains grown in rich media. On the other hand, in vivo DsbC has one pair of cysteines oxidized and one pair reduced. DsbD is required to maintain this reduced pair of cysteines, confirming previous genetic results. A dsbC deletion strain showed decreases in the production of some, but not all, heterologous proteins containing multiple disulfide bonds. Notably, those proteins affected by the dsbC deletion do not have the cysteines paired consecutively.

SummaryThe Cpx envelope stress response of Escherichia coli is controlled by a two-component regulatory system that senses misfolded proteins in extracytoplasmic compartments and responds by inducing the expression of envelope protein folding and degrading factors. We have proposed that in the absence of envelope stress the pathway is maintained in a downregulated state, in part through interactions between the periplasmic inhibitor molecule CpxP and the sensing domain of the histidine kinase CpxA. In this study, we show that depletion of the periplasmic contents of the cell by spheroplast formation does indeed lead to induction of the Cpx envelope stress response. Further, removal of CpxP is an important component of this induction because tethering an MBP±CpxP fusion protein to the spheroplast inner membranes prevents full activation by this treatment. Spheroplast formation has previously been demonstrated to induce the expression of a periplasmic protein of unknown function, Spy. Analysis of spy expression in response to spheroplast formation by Western blot analysis and by lacZ operon fusion in various cpx mutant backgrounds demonstrated that spy is a member of the Cpx regulon. Interestingly, although the only known spy homologue is cpxP, Spy does not appear to perform the same function as CpxP as it is not involved in inhibiting the Cpx envelope stress response. Rather, deletion of spy leads to activation of the s E stress response. Because the s E response is specifically affected by alterations in outer membrane protein biogenesis, we think it possible that Spy may be involved in this process.

No abstract