Study Type – Prognosis (retrospective cohort)
Level of Evidence 2b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively uncommon urological malignancy with survival and outcomes data largely determined from single‐centre series which can be limited by relatively small case numbers. Through review of a large population based cohort, this study provides valuable information regarding epidemiological and survival patterns for over 13,000 patients with UTUC diagnosed over the past three decades. OBJECTIVE • To evaluate epidemiological and survival patterns of upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) over the past 30 years through a review of a large, population‐based database. PATIENTS AND METHODS • Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 1973 to 2005 were reviewed in 10‐year increments to evaluate disease trends. • Univariate and multivariate survival analyses identified prognostic variables for outcomes. RESULTS • In total, 13 800 SEER‐registered cases of UTUC were included. The overall incidence of UTUC increased from 1.88 to 2.06 cases per 100 000 person‐years during the period studied, with an associated increase in ureteral disease (0.69 to 0.91) and a decrease in renal pelvic cancers (1.19 to 1.15). • The proportion of in situ tumours increased from 7.2% to 31.0% (P < 0.001), whereas local tumours declined from 50.4% to 23.6% (P < 0.001). • There was no change in the proportion of patients presenting with distant disease. • In multivariate analysis, increasing patient age (P < 0.001), male gender (P < 0.001), black non‐Hispanic race (P < 0.001), bilateral UTUC (P= 0.001) and regional/distant disease (P < 0.001) were all associated with poorer survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS • The incidence of UTUC has slowly risen over the past 30 years. • Increased use of bladder cancer surveillance regimens and improved abdominal cross‐sectional imaging may contribute to the observed stage migration towards more in situ lesions. • Although pathological disease characteristics impact cancer outcomes, certain sociodemographic factors also appear to portend worse prognosis.

Study Design. Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter database. Objective. To assess how “overcorrection” of the main thoracic curve without control of the proximal curve increases the risk for shoulder imbalance in Lenke type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). Summary of Background Data. Postop shoulder imbalance is a common complication following AIS surgery. It is thought that a more cephalad upper-instrumented vertebra (UIV) decreases the risk of shoulder imbalance in Lenke type 1 and 2 curves; however, this has not been proven. Methods. Thirteen surgeons reviewed preop and 5-year postop clinical photos and PA radiographs of patients from a large multicenter database with Lenke type 1 and 2 AIS curves who were corrected with pedicle screw/rod constructs. Predictors of postop shoulder imbalance were identified by univariate analysis; multivariate analysis was done using the classification and regression tree method to identify independent drivers of shoulder imbalance. Results. One hundred forty-five patients were reviewed. The UIV was T3-T5 in 87% of patients, with 8.9% instrumented up to T1 or T2. Fifty-two (36%) had shoulder imbalance at 5 years. On classification and regression tree analysis when the proximal thoracic (PT) Cobb angle was corrected more than 52%, 80% of the patients had balanced shoulders. Similarly, when the PT curve was corrected less than 52% and the main thoracic (MT) curve was corrected less than 54%, 87% were balanced. However, when the PT curve was corrected less than 52%, and the MT curve was corrected more than 54%, only 41% of patients had balanced shoulders (P = 0.05). This relationship was maintained regardless of the UIV level. Conclusion. In Lenke type 1 and 2 AIS curves, significant correction of the main thoracic curve (>54%) with simultaneous “under-correction” (<52%) of the upper thoracic curve resulted in shoulder height imbalance in 59% of patients, regardless of the UIV. This suggests the PT curve must be carefully scrutinized in order to optimize shoulder balance, especially when larger correction of the MT curve is performed. Level of Evidence: 2

ACDF, anterior cervical discectomy and fusionBMI, body mass indexEQ-5D, EuroQol-5DMCID, minimal clinically important differenceMCS, mental component scalemJOA, modified Japanese Orthopaedic AssociationNDI, Neck Disability IndexNRS, Numerical Rating ScalePCS, physical component scalePROs, patient-reported outcomesSF-12, Short Form 12.