No abstract

Reproductive Toxicology 24 (2007) 131-138. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.07.005Received by publisher: 2007-06-08Harvest Date: 2016-01-04 12:22:51DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.07.005Page Range: 131-13

Male reproductive health has deteriorated in many countries during the last few decades. In the 1990s, declining semen quality has been reported from Belgium, Denmark, France, and Great Britain. The incidence of testicular cancer has increased during the same time. Incidences of hypospadias and cryptorchidism also appear to be increasing. Similar reproductive problems occur in many wildlife species. There are marked geographic differences in the prevalence of male reproductive disorders. While the reasons for these differences are currently unknown, both clinical and laboratory research suggest that the adverse changes may be inter-related and have a common origin in fetal life or childhood. Exposure of the male fetus to supranormal levels of estrogens, such as diethlylstilbestrol, can result in the above-mentioned reproductive defects. The growing number of reports demonstrating that common environmental contaminants and natural factors possess estrogenic activity presents the working hypothesis that the adverse trends in male reproductive health may be, at least in part, associated with exposure to estrogenic or other hormonally active (e.g., antiandrogenic) environmental chemicals during fetal and childhood development. An extensive research program is needed to understand the extent of the problem, its underlying etiology, and the development of a strategy for prevention and intervention. Environ Health Perspect 104(Suppl 4): 741-803 (1996)

Certain chemicals in the environment are estrogenic. The low potencies of these compounds, when studied singly, suggest that they may have little effect on biological systems. The estrogenic potencies of combinations of such chemicals were screened in a simple yeast estrogen system (YES) containing human estrogen receptor (hER). Combinations of two weak environmental estrogens, such as dieldrin, endosulfan, or toxaphene, were 1000 times as potent in hER-mediated transactivation as any chemical alone. Hydroxylated polychlorinated biphenyls shown previously to synergistically alter sexual development in turtles also synergized in the YES. The synergistic interaction of chemical mixtures with the estrogen receptor may have profound environmental implications. These results may represent a previously uncharacterized level of regulation of estrogen-associated responses.

Objective To evaluate the possible role of endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs) on female reproductive disorders emphasizing developmental plasticity and the complexity of endocrine-dependent ontogeny of reproductive organs. Declining conception rates and the high incidence of female reproductive disruptions warrant evaluation of the impact of EDCs on female reproductive health. Design Publications related to the contribution of EDCs to disorders of the ovary (aneuploidy, polycystic ovary syndrome, and altered cyclicity), uterus (endometriosis, uterine fibroids, fetal growth restriction, and pregnancy loss), breast (breast cancer, reduced duration of lactation), and pubertal timing were identified, reviewed, and summarized at a workshop. Conclusion(s) The data reviewed illustrate that EDCs contribute to numerous human female reproductive disorders and emphasize the sensitivity of early life-stage exposures. Many research gaps are identified that limit full understanding of the contribution of EDCs to female reproductive problems. Moreover, there is an urgent need to reduce the incidence of these reproductive disorders, which can be addressed by correlative studies on early life exposure and adult reproductive dysfunction together with tools to assess the specific exposures and methods to block their effects. This review of the EDC literature as it relates to female health provides an important platform on which women’s health can be improved.

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) reproduces many of the effects of estrogen on the murine female reproductive tract and may partially mediate estroged-induced growth and differentiation. This study was performed to investigate the mechanism by which EGF elicits estrogen-like actions in the whole animal. EGF was ad tered to adult ovariectomized mice by slow release pellets implanted under the kidney capsule. The induction ofuterine DNA synthesis and phosphatidylinositol lipid turnover by EGF or admintation of diethylstilbestrol (5 pg/kg), a potent estrogen, was attenuated by the estrogen receptor antagonist ICI 164,384. Furthermore, EGF mimicked the effects of estrogen on enhanced nuclear localization of the estrogen receptor and the formation of a unique form of the estrogen receptor found exclusively in the nucleus. These results suggest that EGF may induce effects similar to those of estrogen in the mouse uterus by an interaction between the EGF signaling pathway and the classical estrogen receptor. The demonstration of cross-talk between polypeptide growth factors and steroid hormone receptors may be of importance to our understanding of the regulation of normal growth and differentiation as well as the mechanisms of transmission of extracellular mitogen signals to the nucleus.It has been proposed that polypeptide growth factors may act as autocrine or paracrine mediators of estrogen-induced mitogenesis (1, 2). The observations that estrogen induces mRNA and protein for both epidermal growth factor (EGF) (3,4) and its receptor (5-7) in rodent uterus are consistent with this hypothesis and implicate a role for the EGF receptor signaling pathway in steroid hormone regulation of uterine tract growth. Furthermore, exogenous EGF administration to adult ovariectomized mice mimics the effects of estrogen on proliferation and differentiation in the murine female reproductive tract (8). EGF-induced mitogenesis in this model is not affected by adrenalectomy or hypophysectomy, which indicates that adrenal or pituitary hormones do not mediate the effects of EGF. In addition, the fact that an EGF-specific antibody administered prior to estradiol partially blocks estrogen-induced uterine epithelial cell proliferation (8) suggests that production of EGF may be necessary for estrogen-induced responses.Presently, the mechanism by which the actions of estrogens and EGF converge is unknown. This study addresses the intriguing possibility that some of the physiological actions of EGF, an extracellular ligand, may be mediated through a nuclear steroid hormone receptor, namely, the estrogen receptor (ER). Two recent reports by Power et al. (9,10) support such a hypothesis. These studies demonstrated that dopamine, an extracellular ligand, was able to stimulate transcriptional enhancement by three members of the steroid receptor superfamily [the progesterone receptor (PR), ER, and COUP (chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter) transcriptional enhancer], which were transfected into CV1 monkey kidney cells. Furthermore, in MCF-7 hu...

BackgroundIn their safety evaluations of bisphenol A (BPA), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and a counterpart in Europe, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), have given special prominence to two industry-funded studies that adhered to standards defined by Good Laboratory Practices (GLP). These same agencies have given much less weight in risk assessments to a large number of independently replicated non-GLP studies conducted with government funding by the leading experts in various fields of science from around the world.ObjectivesWe reviewed differences between industry-funded GLP studies of BPA conducted by commercial laboratories for regulatory purposes and non-GLP studies conducted in academic and government laboratories to identify hazards and molecular mechanisms mediating adverse effects. We examined the methods and results in the GLP studies that were pivotal in the draft decision of the U.S. FDA declaring BPA safe in relation to findings from studies that were competitive for U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, peer-reviewed for publication in leading journals, subject to independent replication, but rejected by the U.S. FDA for regulatory purposes.DiscussionAlthough the U.S. FDA and EFSA have deemed two industry-funded GLP studies of BPA to be superior to hundreds of studies funded by the U.S. NIH and NIH counterparts in other countries, the GLP studies on which the agencies based their decisions have serious conceptual and methodologic flaws. In addition, the U.S. FDA and EFSA have mistakenly assumed that GLP yields valid and reliable scientific findings (i.e., “good science”). Their rationale for favoring GLP studies over hundreds of publically funded studies ignores the central factor in determining the reliability and validity of scientific findings, namely, independent replication, and use of the most appropriate and sensitive state-of-the-art assays, neither of which is an expectation of industry-funded GLP research.ConclusionsPublic health decisions should be based on studies using appropriate protocols with appropriate controls and the most sensitive assays, not GLP. Relevant NIH-funded research using state-of-the-art techniques should play a prominent role in safety evaluations of chemicals.

No abstract