PurposeMultiple clinical and epidemiological studies have provided estimates of fibromyalgia prevalence and sex ratio, but different criteria sets and methodology, as well as bias, have led to widely varying (0.4%->11%) estimates of prevalence and female predominance (>90% to <61%). In general, studies have failed to distinguish Criteria based fibromyalgia (CritFM) from Clinical fibromyalgia (ClinFM). In the current study we compare CritFM with ClinFM to investigate gender and other biases in the diagnosis of fibromyalgia.MethodsWe used a rheumatic disease databank and 2016 fibromyalgia criteria to study prevalence and sex ratios in a selection biased sample of 1761 referred and diagnosed fibromyalgia patients and in an unbiased sample of 4342 patients with no diagnosis with respect to fibromyalgia. We compared diagnostic and clinical variables according to gender, and we reanalyzed a German population study (GPS) (n = 2435) using revised 2016 criteria for fibromyalgia.ResultsIn the selection-biased sample of referred patients with fibromyalgia, more than 90% were women. However, when an unselected sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients was studied for the presence of fibromyalgia, women represented 58.7% of fibromyalgia cases. Women had slightly more symptoms than men, including generalized pain (36.8% vs. 32.4%), count of 37 symptoms (4.7 vs. 3.7) and mean polysymptomatic distress scores (10.2 vs. 8.2). We also found a linear relation between the probability of being females and fibromyalgia and fibromyalgia severity. Women in the GPS represented 59.2% of cases.DiscussionThe perception of fibromyalgia as almost exclusively (≥90%) a women’s disorder is not supported by data in unbiased studies. Using validated self-report criteria and unbiased selection, the female proportion of fibromyalgia cases was ≤60% in the unbiased studies, and the observed CritFM prevalence of fibromyalgia in the GPS was ~2%. ClinFM is the public face of fibromyalgia, but is severely affected by selection and confirmation bias in the clinic and publications, underestimating men with fibromyalgia and overestimating women. We recommend the use of 2016 fibromyalgia criteria for clinical diagnosis and epidemiology because of its updated scoring and generalized pain requirement. Fibromyalgia and generalized pain positivity, widespread pain (WPI), symptom severity scale (SSS) and polysymptomatic distress (PSD) scale should always be reported.

Objective. To determine the effects of group education followed by booster sessions for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to determine whether participation of a significant other influenced the effects. Methods. A total of 218 RA patients, each of them with a partner, took part in the study. Two-thirds of the patients received a 5-week group self-management education program, with booster sessions after 3, 6, and 9 months; half of them received the intervention with a partner, and half without. One-third of the patients received the same educational materials without group sessions. Data were collected 1 week before the group sessions began and 2, 6, and 12 months later. The assessments included health behavior, arthritis self-efficacy, health status, and social interactions. Results. After 12 months, self-efficacy scores for coping with other symptoms were significantly higher for patients participating in the group education without a partner and significantly lower for patients participating in the group education with a partner. Fatigue increased in patients participating in the group education with a significant other and decreased in patients participating in the group education without a significant other. No other effects were found on health status, health behavior, or social interactions. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that participation of a significant other in psychoeducational programs does not have only positive effects. Instead of stimulating patients to adopt beneficial health behaviors and increase their self-efficacy expectations, participation of a significant other led in our program to decreases in self-efficacy and increased fatigue, whereas patients participating in group education without partners showed increases in self-efficacy and decreased fatigue. Booster sessions did not seem to influence results. KEY WORDS. Rheumatoid arthritis; Spouses; Patient education; Self management. INTRODUCTIONRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, disabling disease characterized by chronic inflammation of joints, in most patients resulting in progressive joint destruction with deformities and various degrees of incapacitation (1). Disease activity can vary considerably, even from day to day. The unpredictable and painful course of the disease causes a lot of stress for patients, which has great impact on their quality of life (2).People with arthritis can play an important part in the management of their disease. Patient education can help them to develop the necessary self-management skills and prepare them to make decisions about adjustments in their treatment regimen (3,4). Several studies have shown that patient education can increase knowledge and lead to improvements in self management practices and health status (3,5-10). However, a review of group education for RA patients showed that benefits were limited. Group education interventions for RA patients less often showed beneficial effects on health behavior and physical and psychosocial health status than group interventions for popu...

In this study, methotrexate (MTX) was compared with placebo in the treatment of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma, SSc) in a 24 week randomized double-blind trial, followed by an observational trial of 24 weeks duration. Twenty-nine scleroderma patients were allocated to receive weekly injections of either 15 mg MTX or placebo. Patients who responded favourably after 24 weeks continued with the same regimen for a further 24 weeks; those who showed a poor response on placebo were allocated to further treatment with 15 mg MTX weekly, and those who responded poorly to treatment with 15 mg MTX weekly had their doses increased to 25 mg. A favourable response was defined as an improvement of total skin score (TSS) by ^ 30%, of single breath diffusion capacity (DLco) by ^ 15%, or of the score on a visual analogue scale of general well-being (VAS) by ^ 30%, provided that such improvements were not accompanied by persistent digital ulcerations or worsening of DLco ^ 15%. Seventeen patients were allocated to MTX treatment and 12 to treatment with placebo. After 24 weeks, a significantly larger number of patients receiving MTX (n = 8, 53%) who completed the first 24 weeks of the study had responded favourably compared to patients receiving placebo (n = 1, 10%, P = 0.03). Comparison of separate variables between the two treatment groups by intention-to-treat analysis at week 24 showed improvement in the MTX group of TSS (P = 0.06) and creatinine clearance (P = 0.07). At week 48, 13 patients received MTX from the start of the study and nine during 24 weeks. From these 22 patients, 15 (68%) responded favourably and compared with the start of the study they showed significant improvement of TSS (P = 0.04), VAS (P = 0.02), grip strength of the right hand (P = 0.02) and ESR (P = 0.01). Although the number of patients enrolled in this study is small, these results suggest that in a group of patients with active systemic sclerosis, low-dose MTX seems to be more effective than placebo according to pre-defined response criteria.

The novel coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic primarily affects the respiratory system. Elderly individuals with comorbidity are severely affected. Survivors weaned from mechanical ventilation are at a higher risk of developing post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). This scoping review, based on 40 recent publications, highlights pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in COVID-19. There is a paucity of high-quality research on this topic. However, rehabilitation societies including the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation have issued PR recommendations in COVID-19 pneumonia with productive cough can benefit from diaphragmatic breathing, pursed-lip breathing, and resistance-breathing training. Besides, those in mechanical ventilation and post-PICS COVID-19 cases, oxygen therapy, early mobilization, airway clearance, aerobic exercise, gradual-graded limb muscle resistance exercise, nutritional and psychological interventions should be consideration. During PR, careful evaluation of vital signs and exercise-induced symptoms is also required. When in-person PR is not possible, telerehabilitation should be explored. However, the long-term effects of PR in COVID-19 need further evaluation.

No abstract

The objective of this study is to compare men and women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to controls regarding sexual motivation, activity, satisfaction, and specific sexual problems, and to determine the correlation of physical aspects of the disease with sexual functioning. Questionnaire for screening sexual dysfunctions (QSD), self-constructed questionnaire on experienced distress with joints during sexual activities, arthritis impact measurements scales 2 (AIMS2), and the modified disease activity score 28 (DAS 28) were the methods used. RA patients were recruited from a registration base in three Dutch hospitals. Controls were age and sex matched healthy volunteers. A completed questionnaire was sent back by 271 patients (response 23%). Forty-seven men and 93 women were clinically examined to obtain the DAS 28. Male patients felt less sexual desire, and female patients masturbated and fantasized less than controls. Differences in satisfaction were not found. Male and female patients did not experience more sexual problems than controls. Among the women, correlations were predominantly found between age and sexual motivation and activities, among the men between physical health and sexual problems. Up to 41% of the men (4-41 depending on the joints), and up to 51% of the women (10-51 depending on the joints) have troubles with several joints during sexual activities. Medications influencing ejaculation in men correlated with distress with orgasm. Conclusions are that patients are less sexually active than controls and a considerable number of both male and female patients have trouble with their joints during sexual activities. However, patients do not differ from controls regarding sexual satisfaction. Physiological changes due to RA are apparently independent from those on psychological level. It is argued that sexual satisfaction also depends on personal and social factors. In men, physical health and disease activity are more related with sexual problems than in women.

A study was performed in 86 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

Objectives-To determine the eVects of patient education on compliance and on health in patients with active, recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods-A randomised, controlled, assessor blinded, one year trial. The experimental group followed an education programme. All patients started on sulphasalazine therapy. Compliance with sulphasalazine was measured by pill counting. Compliance rates with regimens of physical exercise, endurance activities, and energy conservation were measured by questionnaires. Compliance with prescriptions of joint protection was scored using a test for joint protection performance. Health was measured by a Disease Activity Score (function of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Ritchie score, and number of swollen joints), C reactive protein, Dutch-AIMS scores, and M-HAQ scores, range of motion of shoulder, elbow, and knee joints. Parameters were scored at baseline and after three, six, and 12 months. Results-Sixty of 65 patients gave informed consent, five of them withdrew from follow up. Compliance with sulphasalazine exceeded 80% with no diVerences between groups. Compliance with physical exercise (at three months), energy conservation (at three and at 12 months), and joint protection (at three months) improved significantly more in the experimental group. The improvements of health were not diVerent in the groups. Conclusion-Compliancewith sulphasalazine among patients with active, recent onset RA is high, whether formal patient education is followed or not. Compliance with physical exercise, energy conservation, and joint protection was increased by patient education. Formal patient education did not improve health status.