ABSTRACT.Purpose: To investigate incidence, clinicopathological features and prognosis of BRAF-mutated conjunctival melanoma in Denmark. Furthermore, to determine BRAF mutations in paired premalignant lesions and evaluate immunohistochemical BRAF V600E oncoprotein detection. Methods:Data from 139 patients with conjunctival melanoma were collected. Archived conjunctival melanoma samples and premalignant lesions were analysed for BRAF mutations using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results were associated with clinicopathological features and compared with BRAF V600E oncoprotein stainings.Results: The overall incidence of conjunctival melanoma (0.5 cases/1 000 000/year) increased during the study period with 0.13 cases/1 000 000/10 years. The increase comprised a higher proportion of patients aged >65 years, epibulbar tumours and tumours developed from a primary acquired melanosis with atypia. BRAF mutations were identified in 39 of 111 (35%) cases. The rate ratio of BRAF-mutated versus BRAFwild-type melanoma did not change over time. BRAF mutations were associated with T1 stage (p = 0.007), young age (p = 0.001), male gender (p = 0.02), sun-exposed location (p = 0.01), mixed/non-pigmented tumour colour (p = 0.02) and nevus origin (p = 0.005), but did not associate with prognosis. BRAF status in conjunctival melanoma and paired premalignant lesions corresponded in 19 of 20 cases. Immunohistochemistry detected BRAF V600E mutations with a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 1.00 in newer conjunctival melanoma samples (2000-2012, n = 47). Conclusion:The incidence of conjunctival melanoma increased in Denmark over 50 years. The proportion of BRAF-mutated conjunctival melanoma was constant. BRAF mutations were identified as early events in conjunctival melanoma, associated with a distinct clinicopathological profile, similar to BRAF-mutated cutaneous melanoma. Immunohistochemical detection of BRAF can be used to assess BRAF V600E mutations.

Patients diagnosed with BRAF V600E mutated cutaneous melanoma show response to treatment with the BRAF inhibitor Vemurafenib. Different methods for BRAF mutation detection exist; however, only the Cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patient selection. The results from this test depend on the percentage of tumor cells in the samples, which clinically may be estimated with substantial variation. We have evaluated five different methods: the Cobas test, Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, TaqMan-based allele-specific PCR, and Competitive Amplification of Differentially Melting Amplicons (CADMA), for detection of BRAF c.1799T>A (V600E) mutations in 28 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cutaneous melanoma samples. We show that the frequency of the BRAF V600E mutation is influenced by the analytical sensitivity of the applied method. However, a 100% consensus was observed among all five methods when the tumor tissue fraction was more than 10% of all tissue or more than 50% of cell-dense tissue. When using Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, or the Cobas test, it may be advisable to perform macrodissection before mutation testing if the tumor cell fraction is low. CADMA and TaqMan may not require macrodissections for a reliable test. Therefore, the use of more sensitive methods may have a future in testing for BRAF mutations in clinical settings.

Cadherin switch and reduced/absent PTEN expression are associated in melanoma, and both factors may play important roles in the progression of melanoma.

The receptor tyrosine kinase KIT and its ligand, stem cell factor (SCF), are essential for the proliferation and survival of normal melanocytes. In melanomas arising on mucosal, acral, and chronically sun-damaged skin, activating KIT mutations have been identified as oncogenic drivers and potent therapeutic targets. Through an initial whole-genome screen for aberrant promoter methylation in melanoma, we identified the KIT promoter as a target for hypermethylation in 43/110 melanoma cell lines, and in 3/12 primary and 11/29 metastatic cutaneous melanomas. Methylation density at the KIT promoter correlated inversely with promoter activity in vitro and in vivo, and the expression of KIT was restored after treatment with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. Hypermethylation of KIT showed no direct or inverse correlations with well-documented melanoma drivers. Growth of melanoma cells in the presence of SCF led to reduced KIT expression and increased methylation density at the KIT promoter, suggesting that SCF may exert a selection pressure for the loss of KIT. The frequent loss of KIT in cutaneous melanoma by promoter hypermethylation suggests that distinct KIT signaling pathways have opposing roles in the pathogenesis of melanoma subtypes.

IHC analysis can be safely used as a BRAF pretreatment screening tool, and no additional test is needed when staining is positive. However, if stains are negative, additional tests are essential for detection of other BRAF mutations. We suggest that using primary melanoma tissues is just as safe as using metastatic tissue for detection of BRAF V600E, as BRAF intertumour heterogeneity is extremely rare. In addition, the time between diagnosis of the primary tumour and diagnosis of the corresponding metastasis seems not to increase the risk of intertumour heterogeneity.