Aims: The ability to determine the presence and viability status of bacteria by molecular methods could offer significant advantages to the food, environmental and health sectors, in terms of improved speed and sensitivity of detection. Methods and Results: In this study, we have assessed three amplification techniques, PCR, RT‐PCR and NASBA, for their ability to detect nucleic acid persistence in an E. coli strain following heat‐killing. NASBA offered the greatest sensitivity of the three methods tested. The presence of residual DNA and mRNA could be detected by PCR and NASBA, respectively, for up to 30 h postdeath, by which time cell death had been confirmed by culture methods. Thus a single quantitative measurement based on nucleic acid amplification did not permit unequivocal determination of cell viability. Conclusions, Significance and Impact of the Study: The correlation between cell viability and persistence of nucleic acids must be well characterized for a particular analytical situation before molecular techniques can be substituted for traditional culture methods.

Background: Intercomparisons of PCR-based data between laboratories require an assurance of assay reproducibility. We performed an interlaboratory study to investigate the contribution made by a variety of thermal cyclers to PCR performance as measured by interblock reproducibility and intrablock repeatability. Methods: Two standardized assays designed to minimize the introduction of non-thermal-cycler-dependent variations were evaluated by 18 laboratories in the United Kingdom, using 33 thermal cyclers of various makes and models. We used a single-product (590 bp) PCR, established in our laboratory as a robust and specific reaction. The second reaction, a multiproduct random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) PCR, was known to be more susceptible to small changes in block temperature and was therefore considered a way of assessing block uniformity with respect to temperature. Assay repeatability data were analyzed with respect to temperature calibration status, the type of temperature control mechanism, thermal cycler age, and the presence of oil overlay or heated lid systems. Results: All (100%) of the laboratories produced the correct target for the single-product PCR assay, although substantial variation in yield in replicate reactions was observed in 9.4% of these. The RAPD reaction generated results that varied extensively both within the same block and between different thermal cyclers. For eight replicates of a positive sample, 88% intrablock repeatability was demonstrated in calibrated thermal cyclers, which decreased to 63% in noncalibrated instruments. Conclusions: Irrespective of the make and model of thermal cycler, temperature-calibrated instruments consistently generated more repeatable RAPD data than noncalibrated instruments. Guidelines are offered on optimizing and monitoring thermal cycler performance.

No abstract