Adenosine and dopamine signaling exert opposite effects in the basal ganglia, a brain region involved in sensory-motor integration. Thus, adenosine agonists induce motor depression and adenosine antagonists, such as caffeine, produce motor activation (1). These opposite effects result from specific antagonistic interactions between subtypes of adenosine and dopamine receptors in the striatum, the main input structure of the basal ganglia. In fact, striatal dopamine receptors and, to some extent, adenosine receptors are segregated in the two main populations of ␥-aminobutyric acid (GABA) efferent neurons. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESCell Cultures-Maintenance of SH-SY5Y cells (parental and D 2 Rtransfected cells) as well as the pharmacological characterization and maintenance of D 2 R-and D 1 R-transfected mouse fibroblast Ltk Ϫ cells are described in detail elsewhere (7-9). For primary cultures, striata were removed from 16-day-old Sprague-Dawley rat embryos (B&K Universal) in Ca 2ϩ /Mg 2ϩ -free PBS supplemented with 20 units/ml penicillin and 20 g/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen). The tissue fragments were pooled and mechanically dissociated in SFM Neurobasal serum-free medium (Invitrogen), supplemented with B27 (Invitrogen), glutamine (2 mM; Invitrogen), penicillin/streptomycin (20 units/ml/20 g/ml; Invitrogen), and ␤-mercaptoethanol (25 M) (Invitrogen). Cells were collected by centrifugation at 100 ϫ g for 5 min and resuspended in fresh medium. The resulting single-cell suspension was seeded on 24-well plates coated with gelatin (Sigma) and poly-L-lysine (Sigma), and cells were grown at 37°C in saturation humidity with 5% CO 2 .Immunolabeling Experiments-Neuroblastoma cells were grown on glass coverslips coated with poly-L-lysine (Sigma) and exposed to vari-* This work was

During the 1980s, indications for the existence of intramembrane interactions between different G protein-coupled receptors, mainly between neuropeptide and monoamine receptors, were obtained in several brain areas (1, 2). It was later proposed that a possible molecular mechanism for this phenomenon was receptor heteromerization (3) and direct evidence for homo-and heteromerization of G protein-coupled receptors has been obtained by several groups. It was first shown that serotonin 5-HT-1B receptors exist as monomers and dimers (4). This was followed by demonstration of dimers and oligomers of dopamine D 1 and D 2 receptors (D 1 and D 2 R) in transfected Sf cells (5-7) and of adenosine A 1 receptors (A 1 Rs) in a natural cell line and in mammalian brain (8). It has recently been reported that a fully functional ␥-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type B receptor demands the heterodimerization of GABA B R1 and GABA B R2 receptors (9-12). Moreover, two functional opioid receptors, the and ␦ subtypes, can undergo heteromerization, which changes the pharmacology of the individual receptors and potentiates signal transduction (13). Finally, D 2 R and somatostatin receptor subtype 5 have been shown to physically interact by forming heterooligomers with enhanced functional activity (14). Direct protein-protein coupling can also exist between G proteincoupled anion channel receptors, as recently shown for dopamine D5 receptor and GABA A receptor, making possible bilateral inhibitory interactions between these receptors (15).Antagonistic adenosine͞dopamine interactions have been widely reported in the central nervous system in behavioral and biochemical studies. Furthermore, in animal models, adenosine agonists and antagonists are potent atypical neuroleptics and antiparkinsonian drugs, respectively (16-18). Thus, adenosine agonists inhibit and adenosine antagonists, such as caffeine, potentiate the behavioral effects induced by dopamine agonists. The evidence suggests that this antagonism is at least in part caused by an intramembrane interaction between specific subtypes of dopamine and adenosine receptors, namely, between

Recently evidence has been presented that adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors form functional heteromeric receptor complexes as demonstrated in human neuroblastoma cells and mouse fibroblast Ltk- cells. These A2A/D2 heteromeric receptor complexes undergo coaggregation, cointernalization, and codesensitization on D2 or A2A receptor agonist treatments and especially after combined agonist treatment. It is hypothesized that the A2A/D2 receptor heteromer represents the molecular basis for the antagonistic A2A/D2 receptor interactions demonstrated at the biochemical and behavioral levels. Functional heteromeric complexes between A2A and metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors (mGluR5) have also recently been demonstrated in HEK-293 cells and rat striatal membrane preparations. The A2A/mGluR5 receptor heteromer may account for the synergism found after combined agonist treatments demonstrated in different in vitro and in vivo models. D2, A2A, and mGluR5 receptors are found together in the dendritic spines of the striatopallidal GABA neurons. Therefore, possible D2/A2A/mGluR5 multimeric receptor complexes and the receptor interactions within them may have a major role in controlling the dorsal and ventral striatopallidal GABA neurons involved in Parkinson's disease and in schizophrenia and drug addiction, respectively.

Uterine cancer is the most common cancer of the female genital tract and is the fourth most frequent cause of cancer death in women in the U.S. Despite the high prevalence of uterine cancers, the molecular events that lead to neoplastic transformation in the uterus are poorly understood. Moreover, there are limited mouse models to study these malignancies. We generated transgenic mice with highmobility group A1 gene (HMGA1a) expression targeted to uterine tissue and all female mice developed tumors by 9 months of age. Histopathologically, the tumors resemble human uterine adenosarcoma and are transplantable. To determine whether these findings are relevant to human disease, we evaluated primary human uterine neoplasms and found that HMGA1a mRNA and protein levels are increased in most high-grade neoplasms but not in normal uterine tissue, benign tumors, or most low-grade neoplasms. We also found that HMGA1a up-regulates cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) expression in transgenic tumors. Moreover, both HMGA1a and COX-2 expression are up-regulated in high-grade human leiomyosarcomas. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, HMGA1a binds directly to the COX-2 promoter in human uterine cancer cells in vivo and activates its expression in transfection experiments. We also show that blocking either HMGA1a or COX-2 in high-grade human uterine cancer cells blocks anchorage-independent cell growth in methylcellulose. These findings show that HMGA1a functions as an oncogene when overexpressed in the uterus and contributes to the pathogenesis of human uterine cancer by activating COX-2 expression. Although a larger study is needed to confirm these results, HMGA1a may be a useful marker for aggressive human uterine cancers. [Cancer Res 2007;67(9):3998-4004]

BackgroundAlthough recent studies have identified genes expressed in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) that induce pluripotency, the molecular underpinnings of normal stem cell function remain poorly understood. The high mobility group A1 (HMGA1) gene is highly expressed in hESCs and poorly differentiated, stem-like cancers; however, its role in these settings has been unclear.Methods/Principal FindingsWe show that HMGA1 is highly expressed in fully reprogrammed iPSCs and hESCs, with intermediate levels in ECCs and low levels in fibroblasts. When hESCs are induced to differentiate, HMGA1 decreases and parallels that of other pluripotency factors. Conversely, forced expression of HMGA1 blocks differentiation of hESCs. We also discovered that HMGA1 enhances cellular reprogramming of somatic cells to iPSCs together with the Yamanaka factors (OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, cMYC – OSKM). HMGA1 increases the number and size of iPSC colonies compared to OSKM controls. Surprisingly, there was normal differentiation in vitro and benign teratoma formation in vivo of the HMGA1-derived iPSCs. During the reprogramming process, HMGA1 induces the expression of pluripotency genes, including SOX2, LIN28, and cMYC, while knockdown of HMGA1 in hESCs results in the repression of these genes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation shows that HMGA1 binds to the promoters of these pluripotency genes in vivo. In addition, interfering with HMGA1 function using a short hairpin RNA or a dominant-negative construct blocks cellular reprogramming to a pluripotent state.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate for the first time that HMGA1 enhances cellular reprogramming from a somatic cell to a fully pluripotent stem cell. These findings identify a novel role for HMGA1 as a key regulator of the stem cell state by inducing transcriptional networks that drive pluripotency. Although further studies are needed, these HMGA1 pathways could be exploited in regenerative medicine or as novel therapeutic targets for poorly differentiated, stem-like cancers.

Although HMGA1 (high-mobility group A1; formerly HMG-I/Y ) is an oncogene that is widely overexpressed in aggressive cancers, the molecular mechanisms underlying transformation by HMGA1 are only beginning to emerge. HMGA1 encodes the HMGA1a and HMGA1b protein isoforms, which function in regulating gene expression. To determine how HMGA1 leads to neoplastic transformation, we looked for genes regulated by HMGA1 using gene expression profile analysis. Here, we show that the STAT3 gene, which encodes the signaling molecule signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), is a critical downstream target of HMGA1a. STAT3 mRNA and protein are up-regulated in fibroblasts overexpressing HMGA1a and activated STAT3 recapitulates the transforming activity of HMGA1a in fibroblasts. HMGA1a also binds directly to a conserved region of the STAT3 promoter in vivo in human leukemia cells by chromatin immunoprecipitation and activates transcription of the STAT3 promoter in transfection experiments. To determine if this pathway contributes to HMGA1-mediated transformation, we investigated STAT3 expression in our HMGA1a transgenic mice, all of which developed aggressive lymphoid malignancy. STAT3 expression was increased in the leukemia cells from our transgenics but not in control cells. Blocking STAT3 function induced apoptosis in the transgenic leukemia cells but not in controls. In primary human leukemia samples, there was a positive correlation between HMGA1a and STAT3 mRNA. Moreover, blocking STAT3 function in human leukemia or lymphoma cells led to decreased cellular motility and foci formation. Our results show that the HMGA1a-STAT3 axis is a potential Achilles heel that could be exploited therapeutically in hematopoietic and other malignancies overexpressing

Although previous studies have established a prominent role for HMGA1 (formerly HMG-I/Y) in aggressive human cancers, the role of HMGA2 (formerly HMGI-C) in malignant transformation has not been clearly defined. The HMGA gene family includes HMGA1, which encodes the HMGA1a and HMGA1b protein isoforms, and HMGA2, which encodes HMGA2. These chromatinbinding proteins function in transcriptional regulation and recent studies also suggest a role in cellular senescence. HMGA1 proteins also appear to participate in cell cycle regulation and malignant transformation, whereas HMGA2 has been implicated primarily in the pathogenesis of benign, mesenchymal tumors. Here, we show that overexpression of HMGA2 leads to a transformed phenotype in cultured lung cells derived from normal tissue. Conversely, inhibiting HMGA2 expression blocks the transformed phenotype in metastatic human non -small cell lung cancer cells. Moreover, we show that HMGA2 mRNA and protein are overexpressed in primary human lung cancers compared with normal tissue or indolent tumors. In addition, there is a statistically significant correlation between HMGA2 protein staining by immunohistochemical analysis and tumor grade (P < 0.001). Our results indicate that HMGA2 is an oncogene important in the pathogenesis of human lung cancer. Although additional studies with animal models are needed, these findings suggest that targeting HMGA2 could be therapeutically beneficial in lung cancer and other cancers characterized by increased HMGA2 expression. (Mol Cancer Res 2008;6(5):743 -50)

No abstract