No abstract

ObjectiveTo show the feasibility of performing surgery across transoceanic distances by using dedicated asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) telecommunication technology. Summary Background DataTechnical limitations and the issue of time delay for transmission of digitized information across existing telecommunication lines had been a source of concern about the feasibility of performing a complete surgical procedure from remote distances. MethodsTo verify the feasibility and safety in humans, the authors attempted remote robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy on a 68-year-old woman with a history of abdominal pain and cholelithiasis. Surgeons were in New York and the patient in Strasbourg. Connections between the sites were done with a high-speed terrestrial network (ATM service). ResultsThe operation was carried out successfully in 54 minutes without difficulty or complications. Despite a round-trip distance of more than 14,000 km, the mean time lag for transmission during the procedure was 155 ms. The surgeons perceived the procedure as safe and the overall system as perfectly reliable. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient returned to normal activities within 2 weeks after surgery. ConclusionsRemote robot-assisted surgery appears feasible and safe. Teletransmission of active surgical manipulations has the potential to ensure availability of surgical expertise in remote locations for difficult or rare operations, and to improve surgical training worldwide.Remote surgical operations require both rapid and accurate transmission of information. Factors that influence significantly the rapidity and accuracy of this information are the time required to convert video images and gestures into electronic signals, and the bandwidth and time lag of existing telecommunication lines.1,2 Using current technology, we recently showed the feasibility of performing remote surgical operations in an experimental animal model.3 Results of our experimental tests allowed us to perform, for the first time, remote robot-assisted surgery on a human. Here we present the case and postoperative course and discuss the current limitations and the potential clinical and social impact of remote telesurgery.

This process was a useful first step toward establishing guidelines for the management of anastomotic leak.

ObjectiveTo determine the safety and feasibility of performing telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomies. This will serve as a preliminary step toward the integration of computer-rendered three-dimensional preoperative imaging studies of anatomy and pathology onto the patient's own anatomy during surgery. Summary Background DataComputer-assisted surgery (CAS) increases the surgeon's dexterity and precision during minimally invasive surgery, especially when using microinstruments. Clinical trials have shown the improved microsurgical precision afforded by CAS in the minimally invasive setting in cardiac and gynecologic surgery. Future applications would allow integration of preoperative data and augmented-reality simulation onto the actual procedure. MethodsBeginning in September 1999, CAS was used to perform cholecystectomies on 25 patients at a single medical center in this nonrandomized, prospective study. The operations were performed by one of two surgeons who had previous laboratory experience using the computer interface. The entire dissection was performed by the surgeon, who remained at a distance from the patient but in the same operating room. The operation was evaluated according to time of dissection, time of assembly/disassembly of robot, complications, immediate postoperative course, and short-term follow-up. ResultsTwenty of the 25 patients had symptomatic cholelithiasis, 1 had a gallbladder polyp, and 4 had acute cholecystitis. Twenty-four of the 25 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were successfully completed by CAS. There was one conversion to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Set-up and takedown of the robotic arms took a median of 18 minutes. The median operative time for dissection and the overall operative time were 25 and 108 minutes, respectively. There were no intraoperative complications. There was one postoperative complication of a suspected pulmonary embolus, which was treated with anticoagulation. All patients were tolerating diet at discharge. ConclusionsLaparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by CAS is safe and feasible, with operative times and patient recovery similar to those of conventional laparoscopy. At present, CAS cholecystectomy offers no obvious advantages to patients, but the potential advantages of CAS lie in its ability to convert the surgical act into digitized data. This digitized format can then interface with other forms of digitized data, such as pre-or intraoperative imaging studies, or be transmitted over a distance. This has the potential to revolutionize the way surgery is performed.Computers and technology are increasingly interacting with surgeons both inside and outside of the operating room, as exemplified by the rapid adoption of laparoscopy into routine use. The computer's ability to enhance, modify, or transform electronic data is changing patient management before, during, and after surgery. As such, these technologic advancements are having an ever-increasing influence on the way surgery is planned and performed.

Significant improvement in quality of life and social functioning accrues from elective sigmoid resection in the majority of patients. Avoidance of subsequent episodic attacks therefore should not represent the sole reason for operating but instead patient-centered issues should be prioritized.

No abstract

Although a higher peritoneal contamination was found in the NOSE procedures, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes relative to standard approach. Avoiding a minilaparotomy to extract the specimen resulted in a significantly lower postoperative analgesic requirement in the NOSE group.

No abstract