ObjectiveTo identify themes that contribute to the most positive and negative perspectives of cochlear implants (CIs) on Twitter.Study DesignA cross‐sectional qualitative study.SettingSocial media (Twitter).MethodsIn this study, all English‐language original tweets mentioning “cochlear implant” from 2019 to 2021 were collected from Twitter's Academic Research Database using a custom Python script. Sentiment analysis was performed using VADER, a sentiment analysis tool built to analyze the inherent positivity or negativity of social media posts. Tweets were quantitatively sorted by compound sentiment score (range −1 [most negative] to 1 [most positive]). Thematic analysis based on grounded theory was performed on the most positive, negative, and “liked” tweets.ResultsOf the 19,376 tweets included, the average (standard deviation) compound sentiment score was 0.21 (0.46). A total of 10,375 (53.5%) tweets had a positive tone, 4965 (25.6%) were neutral and 4036 (20.8%) were negative. Of the 100 most negative tweets, the most prominent themes were media representation (21.9%), the controversy of CI within the Deaf community (19.8%), and unrelated to direct patient experience (16.7%). Of the 100 most positive tweets, the most prominent themes were tweets of happiness and support (25.0%), tweets unrelated to direct patient experience (18.0%), and tweets about hearing new sounds (10.0%).ConclusionWhile the majority of tweets on CI carried a positive tone, there are ongoing challenges with the stigma surrounding CI. Public perspectives of CI on social media may help clinicians counsel CI patients and elucidate issues that lead to newfound acceptance or ongoing stigma of CI in the general population.
Objectives The American Academy of Otolaryngology clinical practice guidelines recommend cross‐sectional imaging or fine needle aspiration for any neck mass in an adult that persists beyond 2 weeks that is not convincingly related to a bacterial infection. We aimed to assess the role of ultrasound in the evaluation and management of neck masses. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of adult patients evaluated in the Otolaryngology clinic at a single institution from December 2014 to December 2015 for a visible or palpable neck mass persistent beyond 2 weeks who had an ultrasound exam as part of their initial workup. Patients with a history of head and neck malignancy or those presenting wtih primary salivary or thyroid gland lesions were excluded. Sonographic features, demographics, imaging, and biopsy results were recorded. Results Of the 56 patients who met inclusion criteria, 36 (64.3%) received FNA or biopsy, of which 18 (50%) demonstrated malignant pathology. Twenty patients (35.7%) demonstrated benign features on ultrasound and did not undergo tissue sampling. Two of these 20 patients underwent subsequent cross‐sectional imaging. Eight of these 20 patients were followed with serial ultrasound with an average of 3 exams over 14.7 months. The remaining 12 patients had spontaneous resolution of their adenopathy. None of these 20 patients was subsequently diagnosed with malignancy. Conclusion In this study, approximately one third of patients presenting with a visible or palpable neck mass were able to safely avoid cross‐sectional imaging and/or tissue sampling when ultrasound demonstrated features consistent with benign pathology. Our results suggest that ultrasound can play a useful role in the initial evaluation and management of adults presenting with a neck mass. Level of Evidence IV.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.