Vertebrate muscle development begins with the patterning of the paraxial mesoderm by inductive signals from midline tissues [1, 2]. Subsequent myotome growth occurs by the addition of new muscle fibers. We show that in zebrafish new slow-muscle fibers are first added at the end of the segmentation period in growth zones near the dorsal and ventral extremes of the myotome, and this muscle growth continues into larval life. In marine teleosts, this mechanism of growth has been termed stratified hyperplasia [3]. We have tested whether these added fibers require an embryonic architecture of muscle fibers to support their development and whether their fate is regulated by the same mechanisms that regulate embryonic muscle fates. Although Hedgehog signaling is required for the specification of adaxial-derived slow-muscle fibers in the embryo [4, 5], we show that in the absence of Hh signaling, stratified hyperplastic growth of slow muscle occurs at the correct time and place, despite the complete absence of embryonic slow-muscle fibers to serve as a scaffold for addition of these new slow-muscle fibers. We conclude that slow-muscle-stratified hyperplasia begins after the segmentation period during embryonic development and continues during the larval period. Furthermore, the mechanisms specifying the identity of these new slow-muscle fibers are different from those specifying the identity of adaxial-derived embryonic slow-muscle fibers. We propose that the independence of early, embryonic patterning mechanisms from later patterning mechanisms may be necessary for growth.

Drosophila partner of paired ( ppa), which encodes an F-box protein that targets the Pax transcription factor Paired (Prd) for degradation, has the striking property that its mRNA is expressed in a striped pattern with a characteristic registration relative to the striped expression of prd in early embryos. Localized expression of F-box genes was not expected because F-box proteins generally have multiple substrates. We hypothesize that the patterned mRNA expression of Drosophila and zebrafish ppa homologs may reflect constraints resulting from the localized expression of their degradation substrates. To begin to test this idea, we wished to determine whether patterned mRNA expression is commonly observed among F-box genes, or whether it might be peculiar to ppa and its homologs, or even specific to Drosophila. We examined embryonic expression of all predicted F-box genes in Drosophila and found that mRNAs of 21 out of 23 predicted F-box genes are expressed uniformly in early Drosophila embryos, whereas ppa and CG4911 mRNAs are patterned, CG4911 being expressed at the positions of gastrulation folds. We also identified and tested expression of ppa in zebrafish, which has two highly conserved homologs, ppaA and ppaB, and found that both are expressed during embryogenesis and have enriched mRNA expression in regions including the neural tube, the head, and the fin buds. Despite being unusual in having localized transcripts, we found that the Drosophila and zebrafish homologs interact with the expected Drosophila components of the cellular degradation machinery - Skp1 (SkpA) and Rbx1 (Roc1a) - suggesting that the Ppa proteins are indeed functional F-box proteins. We conclude that patterning of ppa mRNA could reflect a constraint on ppa function that is not common among F-box genes. Electronic supplementary material to this paper can be obtained by using the Springer LINK server located at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00427-002-0222-7.