Extinction of contextual fear in rats is enhanced by exposure to a novel environment at 1-2 h before or 1 h after extinction training. This effect is antagonized by administration of protein synthesis inhibitors anisomycin and rapamycin into the hippocampus, but not into the amygdala, immediately after either novelty or extinction training, as well as by the gene expression blocker 5,6-dichloro-1-beta-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole administered after novelty training, but not after extinction training. Thus, this effect can be attributed to a mechanism similar to synaptic tagging, through which long-term potentiation can be enhanced by other long-term potentiations or by exposure to a novel environment in a protein synthesis-dependent fashion. Extinction learning produces a tag at the appropriate synapses, whereas novelty learning causes the synthesis of plasticity-related proteins that are captured by the tag, strengthening the synapses that generated this tag.

No abstract

Exposure to a novel environment enhances the extinction of contextual fear. This has been explained by tagging of the hippocampal synapses used in extinction, followed by capture of proteins from the synapses that process novelty. The effect is blocked by the inhibition of hippocampal protein synthesis following the novelty or the extinction. Here, we show that it can also be blocked by the postextinction or postnovelty intrahippocampal infusion of the NMDA receptor antagonist 2-amino-5-phosphono pentanoic acid; the inhibitor of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), autocamtide-2-related inhibitory peptide; or the blocker of L-voltage-dependent calcium channels (L-VDCCs), nifedipine. Inhibition of proteasomal protein degradation by β-lactacystin has no effect of its own on extinction or on the influence of novelty thereon but blocks the inhibitory effects of all the other substances except that of rapamycin on extinction, suggesting that their action depends on concomitant synaptic protein turnover. Thus, the tagging-andcapture mechanism through which novelty enhances fear extinction involves more molecular processes than hitherto thought: NMDA receptors, L-VDCCs, CaMKII, and synaptic protein turnover.hippocampus | memory | synaptic tagging and capture | synaptic plasticity | fear conditioning F rey and Morris (1, 2) and their collaborators (3-7) proposed a mechanism whereby relatively "weak" hippocampal longterm potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD) lasting only a few minutes can nevertheless "tag" the synapses involved with proteins synthesized ad hoc, so that other plasticity-related proteins (PRPs) produced at other sets of synapses by other LTPs or LTDs can be captured by the tagged synapses and strengthen their activity to "long" LTPs or LTDs lasting hours or days (8). LTDs and LTPs can "cross"-tag each other; that is, LTDs can enhance both LTDs and LTPs, and vice versa (6,8). Because many learned behaviors rely on hippocampal LTP or LTD (7-9), among them the processing of novelty (9, 10) and the making of extinction (11-13), interactions between consecutive learnings can also be explained by the "tagging-and-capture" hypothesis (9, 10, 13), whose application to behavior became known as "behavioral tagging and capture" (5, 7, 9, 13). Typically, exposure to a novel environment [e.g., a nonanxiogenic 50 × 50 × 40-cm open field (OF) (5,7,9,10,14)] is interpolated before testing for another task, which becomes enhanced (4-10, 13). The usual reaction to novelty is orienting and exploration (14), followed by habituation of this response (14-16). Habituation is perhaps the simplest form of learning, and it consists of inhibition of the orienting/exploratory response (14, 16).We recently showed that the brief exposure of rats to a novel environment (the OF) within a limited time window enhances the extinction of contextual fear conditioning (CFC) through a mechanism of synaptic tagging and capture (13), which is a previously unidentified example of behavioral tagging of inhibitory lea...

No abstract

Social recognition memory (SRM) is crucial for reproduction, forming social groups, and species survival. Despite its importance, SRM is still relatively little studied. Here we examine the participation of the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus (CA1) and the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and that of dopaminergic, noradrenergic, and histaminergic systems in both structures in the consolidation of SRM. Male Wistar rats received intra-CA1 or intra-BLA infusions of different drugs immediately after the sample phase of a social discrimination task and 24-h later were subjected to a 5-min retention test. Animals treated with the protein synthesis inhibitor, anisomycin, into either the CA1 or BLA were unable to recognize the previously exposed juvenile (familiar) during the retention test. When infused into the CA1, the β-adrenoreceptor agonist, isoproterenol, the D1/D5 dopaminergic receptor antagonist, SCH23390, and the H2 histaminergic receptor antagonist, ranitidine, also hindered the recognition of the familiar juvenile 24-h later. The latter drug effects were more intense in the CA1 than in the BLA. When infused into the BLA, the β-adrenoreceptor antagonist, timolol, the D1/D5 dopamine receptor agonist, SKF38393, and the H2 histaminergic receptor agonist, ranitidine, also hindered recognition of the familiar juvenile 24-h later. In all cases, the impairment to recognize the familiar juvenile was abolished by the coinfusion of agonist plus antagonist. Clearly, both the CA1 and BLA, probably in that order, play major roles in the consolidation of SRM, but these roles are different in each structure vis-à-vis the involvement of the β-noradrenergic, D1/D5-dopaminergic, and H2-histaminergic receptors therein.social memory | basolateral amygdala | hippocampus | norepinephrine | dopamine

Extinction is the learned inhibition of retrieval. Recently it was shown that a brief exposure to a novel environment enhances the extinction of contextual fear in rats, an effect explainable by a synaptic tagging-and-capture process. Here we examine whether this also happens with the extinction of another fear-motivated task, inhibitory avoidance (IA), and whether it depends on dopamine acting on D1 or D5 receptors. Rats were trained first in IA and then in extinction of this task. The retention of extinction was measured 24 h later. A 5-min exposure to a novel environment 30 min before extinction training enhanced its retention. Right after exposure to the novelty, animals were given bilateral intrahippocampal infusions of vehicle (VEH), of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin, of the D1/D5 dopaminergic antagonist SCH23390, of the PKA inhibitor Rp-cAMP or of the PKC inhibitor Gö6976, and of the PKA stimulator Sp-cAMP or of the PKC stimulator PMA. The novelty increased hippocampal dopamine levels and facilitated the extinction, which was inhibited by intrahippocampal protein synthesis inhibitor anisomysin, D1/D5 dopaminerdic antagonist SCH23390, or PKA inhibitor Rp-cAMP and unaffected by PKC inhibitor Gö6976; additionally, the hippocampal infusion of PKA stimulator Sp-cAMP reverts the effect of D1/D5 dopaminergic antagonist SCH 23390, but the infusion of PKC stimulator PMA does not. The results attest to the generality of the novelty effect on fear extinction, suggest that it relies on synaptic tagging and capture, and show that it depends on hippocampal dopamine D1 but not D5 receptors.dopamine | inhibitory avoidance | modulation of extinction | novelty | behavioral tagging and capture F rey and Morris (1, 2) described the enhancing influence of neuronal plastic processes [long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD)] generated at one set of hippocampal synapses on LTP and LTD generated at other synapses. This influence is explainable by interactions between new proteins, called plasticity-related proteins (PRPs), at the two sets of synapses; the PRPs that tag one of them can be captured by those of others and enhance their responsiveness (3-5). Many memories rely on hippocampal LTP and LTD (1, 2, 6-11), and the "synaptic tagging-and-capture" process has been applied to the explanation of interactions between concurrent memories (11-13), among which are novelty and fear acquisition (12,14) and novelty and fear extinction (15, 16). Exposure to novelty [an open field (OF) in which they had never been before] involves two consecutive processes: its detection, which is very brief (seconds), and the immediately ensuing habituation (17), which lasts much longer; both rely on hippocampal LTD (18). With a relatively restricted time window before and/or after an extinction trial, novelty can enhance the extinction of contextual fear conditioning (CFC) lastingly (15,16). This is obviously of potential importance for exposure therapy (18-21).In rodents, the exploration of a novel environment, object, ...

Recent discoveries demonstrated that recruitment of alternative brain circuits permits compensation of memory impairments following damage to brain regions specialized in integrating and/or storing specific memories, including both dorsal hippocampus and basolateral amygdala (BLA). Here, we first report that the integrity of the brain histaminergic system is necessary for long-term, but not for short-term memory of step-down inhibitory avoidance (IA). Second, we found that phosphorylation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) responsive-element-binding protein, a crucial mediator in long-term memory formation, correlated anatomically and temporally with histamine-induced memory retrieval, showing the active involvement of histamine function in CA1 and BLA in different phases of memory consolidation. Third, we found that exogenous application of histamine in either hippocampal CA1 or BLA of brain histamine-depleted rats, hence amnesic, restored long-term memory; however, the time frame of memory rescue was different for the two brain structures, short lived (immediately posttraining) for BLA, long lasting (up to 6 h) for the CA1. Moreover, long-term memory was formed immediately after training restoring of histamine transmission only in the BLA. These findings reveal the essential role of histaminergic neurotransmission to provide the brain with the plasticity necessary to ensure memorization of emotionally salient events, through recruitment of alternative circuits. Hence, our findings indicate that the histaminergic system comprises parallel, coordinated pathways that provide compensatory plasticity when one brain structure is compromised.histamine | hippocampus | amygdala | lateral ventricle | inhibitory avoidance

Author contributions: J.d.C.M. and I.I. designed research; J.d.C.M. and F.B. performed research; J.d.C.M. analyzed data; and J.d.C.M. and I.I. wrote the paper.