PurposeTo evaluate change in quality of life (QoL) and symptoms in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) in conditions of current clinical practice.MethodsProspective, longitudinal, multicenter open-label study was carried out in urology outpatient clinics. Patients were ≥40 years of age with an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score ≥8. QoL and symptoms were measured at baseline and 6 months using the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BII) and the IPSS.Results1713 patients were included for analysis. Mean (SD) IPSS and BII scores at baseline were 16.8 (5.4) and 6.8 (2.6), respectively. 8.9 % (n = 153) of study participants did not receive treatment (watchful waiting, WW), 70.3 % (n = 1204) were prescribed monotherapy (alpha-adrenergic blockers [AB]; phytotherapy [PT, of which 95.2 % was the hexanic extract of Serenoa repens, HESr]; or 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors [5ARI]), and 20.8 % (n = 356) received combined treatment (AB + 5ARI; AB + HESr; others). At 6 months, improvements in QoL were similar across the different medical treatment (MT) groups, both for monotherapy (AB: mean improvement [SD] of 2.4 points [2.4]; PT: 1.9 [2.4]; 5ARI: 2.5 [2.3]) and combined therapy (AB + 5ARI: 3.1 [2.9]; AB + PT: 3.1 [2.5]). There were no clinically significant differences between MT groups and all showed significant improvement over WW (p < 0.05). HESr showed similar efficacy to AB and 5ARI both as monotherapy and in combination with AB. Results on the IPSS were similar.ConclusionsImprovements in QoL and symptoms were equivalent across the medical treatments most widely used in real-life practice to manage patients with moderate or severe LUTS. HESr showed an equivalent efficacy to AB and 5ARI with fewer side effects.
•There were major differences in the clinico-pathological characteristics of Caucasian and Japanese patients. •However, RFS and CSS probabilities were not affected by ethnicity and race was not an independent predictor of either recurrence or cancer-related death.
Study Type – Prognosis (inception cohort series)
Level of Evidence 2a
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add?
ECOG Performance Status has gained wide popularity as an integral part of the assessment of patients with upper urinary tract carcinoma. Our findings indicate that ECOG‐PS is strongly associated with perioperative and overall survival and should be considered carefully in our decision‐making process.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the prognostic role of ECOG Performance status (ECOG‐PS) in a large multi‐institutional international cohort of patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data of 427 patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy at five international institutions in Asia, Europe and Northern America were collected retrospectively from 1987 to 2008.
Logistic and Cox regression models were used for univariable and multivariable analyses.
RESULTS
ECOG‐PS was 0 in 272 of 427 (64%) patients. The median follow‐up of the whole cohort was 32 months.
The five‐year recurrence‐free (RFS), cancer‐specific (CSS) and overall (OS) survival estimates were 71.7%, 74.9% and 68.5%, respectively, in patients with ECOG‐PS 0 compared with 60.1%, 67.8%, and 51.4% respectively, in patients with ECOG‐PS ≥1 (P value 0.08 for RFS, 0.43 for CSS, and <0.001 for OS, respectively).
On multivariable Cox regression analyses, ECOG‐PS was not an independent predictor of either RFS (hazard ratio 1.4; P = 0.107) or CSS (hazard ratio 1.2; P = 0.426) but was an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio 1.5; P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
In this large multicentre international study, ECOG‐PS was not significantly associated with RFS and CSS.
Conversely we find a strong association with survival 1‐month after surgery and OS. Further research is needed to ascertain the additive prognostic role of ECOG‐PS in well‐designed prospective multicentre studies.
To investigate whether tamsulosin (TAM) and the hexanic extract of Serenoa repens (HESr) are more effective in combination than as monotherapy in men with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). Subset analysis of data from a 6-month, multicenter observational study. Patients received either tamsulosin (0.4 mg/day) or HESr (320 mg/day) alone or in combination. Primary endpoints were change in symptoms and quality of life. Tolerability was also assessed. Seven hundred and nine patients were available for intention to treat (ITT) analysis, 263 treated with tamsulosin, 262 with HESr, and 184 with TAM + HESr. After 6 months, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) scores improved by a mean (standard deviation) of 7.2 (5.0) points in the TAM + HESr group compared to 5.7 (4.3) points with TAM alone and 5.4 (4.6) points with HESr (p < 0.001). Quality of life showed greatest improvement with combination therapy (p < 0.02). Adverse effects were reported by 1.9% of patients receiving HESr, 13.3% receiving TAM, and 12.0% receiving TAM + HESr (p < 0.001). In men with moderate/severe LUTS/BPH, combination treatment with TAM + HESr produced more effective symptom relief and greater improvement in quality of life than with either treatment alone, with acceptable tolerability.
In a subset analysis of data from a 6-month, multicenter, non-interventional study, we compared change in symptoms and quality of life (QoL), and treatment tolerability, in men with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) receiving tamsulosin (TAM, 0.4 mg/day) or the hexanic extract of Serenoa repens (HESr, 320 mg/day) as monotherapy. Symptoms and QoL were assessed using the IPSS and BII questionnaires, respectively. Patients in the treatment groups were matched using two statistical approaches (iterative and propensity score matching). Within the iterative matching approach, data was available from a total of 737 patients (353 TAM, 384 HESr). After 6 months, IPSS scores improved by a mean (SD) of 5.0 (4.3) points in the TAM group and 4.5 (4.7) points in the HESr group (p = 0.117, not significant). Improvements in QoL were equivalent in the two groups. TAM patients reported significantly more adverse effects than HESr patients (14.7% vs 2.1%; p < 0.001), particularly ejaculation dysfunction and orthostatic hypotension. These results show that HESr is a valid treatment option for men with moderate/severe LUTS/BPH; improvements in urinary symptoms and QoL were similar to those observed for tamsulosin, but with considerably fewer adverse effects.
Introduction: Peyronie's disease (PD) is a chronic wound-healing disorder characterized by formation of fibrous inelastic scarring of the tunica albuginea resulting in a variety of penile deformities. In most cases, PD is accompanied by a physical and psychological impact. Xiaflex ® is an injectable collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCh) preparation consisting of a predetermined mixture of two distinct collagenases. Recently the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Xiaflex ® for the nonsurgical treatment of men with PD with curvature of 30° or more and tangible scar tissue plaque in their penis. Method: This article presents a comprehensive review of the updated information on the use of Xiaflex ® for the nonsurgical treatment of PD. Results: Mean improvements in penile curvature ranging from 29% to 34% and in bother domain scores have been reported. The majority of the reported adverse effects are mild or moderate and 79% resolve without intervention. Conclusion: The combined results of these trials have led to the FDA approval of CCh for the treatment of PD. However, the long-term effects and results need further investigation, with large follow-up series. Considering these results, future perspectives will probably result in the use of a combined or sequential therapy including CCh.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.