PURPOSE The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a global impact, and Singapore has seen 33,000 confirmed cases. Patients with cancer, their caregivers, and health care workers (HCWs) need to balance the challenges associated with COVID-19 while ensuring that cancer care is not compromised. This study aimed to evaluate the psychological effect of COVID-19 on these groups and the prevalence of burnout among HCWs. METHODS A cross-sectional survey of patients, caregivers, and HCWs at the National Cancer Centre Singapore was performed over 17 days during the lockdown. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Maslach Burnout Inventory were used to assess for anxiety and burnout, respectively. Self-reported fears related to COVID-19 were collected. RESULTS A total of 624 patients, 408 caregivers, and 421 HCWs participated in the study, with a response rate of 84%, 88%, and 92% respectively. Sixty-six percent of patients, 72.8% of caregivers, and 41.6% of HCWs reported a high level of fear from COVID-19. The top concern of patients was the wide community spread of COVID-19. Caregivers were primarily worried about patients dying alone. HCWs were most worried about the relatively mild symptoms of COVID-19. The prevalence of anxiety was 19.1%, 22.5%, and 14.0% for patients, caregivers, and HCWs, respectively. Patients who were nongraduates and married, and caregivers who were married were more anxious. The prevalence of burnout in HCWs was 43.5%, with more anxious and fearful HCWs reporting higher burnout rates. CONCLUSION Fears and anxiety related to COVID-19 are high. Burnout among HCWs is similar to rates reported prepandemic. An individualized approach to target the specific fears of each group will be crucial to maintain the well-being of these vulnerable groups and prevent burnout of HCWs.
PET/CT upstages 17% of cases and detects occult splenic involvement. This may have potential therapeutic and prognostic implications. SUV >10 may predict for an aggressive histology. Except for indolent B-NHL, our data show that PET scans have a good overall NPV in excluding lymphomatous bone marrow involvement. This is particularly true of early-stage HL, suggesting that BMB may be safely omitted in this group.
This study attempted to evaluate the usefulness of the International Prognostic Index (IPI) as a prognostic model in patients treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin and prednisolone) chemotherapy. We compared 279 patients with DLBCL. Among them, 183 received CHOP while 96 received R-CHOP. Results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in terms of both the patient and the lymphoma characteristics. The estimated 2-year survival was significantly higher among patients treated with R-CHOP compared to CHOP alone (85.6% vs. 64.7%, P = 0.004). Both the IPI and age-adjusted IPI were less useful as prognostic models in patients receiving R-CHOP compared to CHOP. In the multivariate analysis, age >or= 60, elevated serum LDH, low serum albumin and advanced stages of disease were each independently associated with decreased survival in patients treated with CHOP. In contrast, among those treated with R-CHOP, only male sex and advanced stage of disease were each independently associated with decreased survival. Using these two factors, patients treated with R-CHOP could be separated into three prognostic groups with 5-year estimated survival ranging from 47% to 100% (P < 0.0001). In summary, we can conclude that with the significant improvement in survival following the use of rituximab, the relevance of previously recognized prognostic factors has to be reassessed and re-evaluated.
Extra-nodal NK/T-cell lymphoma was associated with a poorer prognosis compared with PTCL and is likely to comprise two distinct variants with different clinical behavior and prognosis.
ObjectivesHaving to access life-sustaining treatment during the emerging COVID-19 outbreak has placed patients with cancer at an especially vulnerable position notwithstanding their immunocompromised condition. The present study aimed to elucidate cancer patients’ and their caregivers’ experiences during this outbreak.DesignFace-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted.SettingA tertiary cancer care facility.Participants16 patients with cancer and 14 caregivers. Inclusions criteria were: (A) diagnosed with cancer, (B) receiving active treatment or follow-ups, (C) aged 21 years and above and (D) fluent in English or Mandarin.ResultsThematic analysis was conducted. Five themes were identified: heightened sense of threat, impact on healthcare experience, responsibility falls on oneself, striving for normalcy and sense of safety and trust. Heightened threat of COVID-19 was more pronounced in patients and linked to vulnerability and fear, uncertainty and actions of socially irresponsible others. Dominant in their healthcare experience was prioritising cancer and treatment amidst heightened threat and anticipatory worry about treatment disruptions. Both noted on the importance of taking responsibility for one’s health, with caregivers reporting a reinforced sense of duty towards patients. They strived to maintain normalcy by viewing COVID-19 as beyond personal control, downplaying and living life as usual. Their resolve was supported by a sense of safety from the actions of authorities, hospitals and trust towards healthcare providers.ConclusionsCancer intensifies threat and the emotional impact of COVID-19 and may trigger specific concerns related to treatment. Psychoeducation interventions led by healthcare providers over digital platforms could help address cancer-specific concerns and support patients and caregivers during the pandemic.
The prevalence of and risk factors for vitamin D deficiency were examined for recent adult immigrants from East Africa living in Melbourne. Demographic data were collected via a face-to-face questionnaire and risk factors predicting deficiency were examined. Suboptimal levels <25 nmol/L were found in 61 patients (53%; 74% of women; 20% of men). Lower levels were more likely in: (i) patients with a longer duration of residence in Australia, (ii) patients who were mostly covered when outdoors and (iii) women. Routine assessment for vitamin D deficiency should be considered for male and female immigrants from East Africa.
Intestinal parasite infections are a major cause of ill health in many resource-poor countries. This study compares the types and rates of these infections and their risk factors in recently arrived and long-term immigrants in Australia. Cross-sectional surveys of 127 East African and 234 Cambodian immigrants and refugees were undertaken in 2000 and 2002, respectively, to assess the burden of intestinal parasites and collect demographic information. Serum samples were assessed for eosinophilia and Strongyloides stercoralis and Schistosoma antibodies, and feces examined for ova, cysts, and parasites. Intestinal parasites were identified in 77/117 fecal samples from East African and in 25/204 samples collected from Cambodian participants. Eleven percent (14/124) of East Africans and 42% (97/230) of Cambodians had positive or equivocal serology for S stercoralis. Schistosoma serology was positive or equivocal in 15% (19/124) of East African participants. Potentially serious intestinal parasite infections are common among recent and longer term immigrants despite multiple visits to health care providers. Immigrants and refugees from high-risk countries would benefit from comprehensive health checks soon after resettlement.
Sarcomas are rare mesenchymal malignancies that demonstrate great clinical and biological heterogeneity. A variety of sarcomas develop in the context of well-defined heritable cancer predisposition syndromes, associations that are often overlooked, given the rarity and diversity of sarcomas and the equivalent relative infrequency of cancer genetic syndromes. This review describes in detail selected heritable cancer predisposition syndromes that are known to be associated with sarcomas. Beyond the molecular and clinical features that define each syndrome, disparities in clinical presentation, natural history, and treatment of syndrome-associated compared with otherwise histologically identical sporadic sarcomas will be described. The clinical approach to selected sarcoma subsets with a view to identifying possible associations with these syndromes will then be described. Although the treatment of the majority of sarcomas will not differ significantly between sporadic cases and those associated with predisposition syndromes, knowledge of features such as unique anatomic sites of affliction or excess toxicities with particular cytotoxic therapies can facilitate alterations in therapeutic strategies to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity. In addition, recognition of cancer genetic predisposition syndrome will allow patients and their relatives to undertake appropriate genetic counseling and testing, as well as screening, surveillance, and interventional measures, as needed. Situating sarcomas within the genetic endowment of particular patients-specifically that which confers a higher risk of malignancy-will enable clinicians to better manage the patient as a whole, complementing the great efforts currently routinely undertaken to genomically characterize somatic tumor changes with a view to achieving the dream of personalized medicine. The Oncologist 2016;21:1002-1013 Implications for Practice: Sarcomas are uncommon malignancies that often occur sporadically but can also arise in the setting of a recognized heritable cancer predisposition syndrome. Identification of such associations when present can facilitate refinement and optimization of treatment strategies for the sarcoma so as to minimize toxicity and maximize efficacy. Discerning genetic predisposition can also facilitate institution of genetic counseling, as well as screening or surveillance schema for both the patient and his or her relatives, if required. Vigilance for these syndromes has the potential to significantly enhance the quality and comprehensiveness of sarcoma clinical management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.