Objectives: The role of cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs) in diagnostics of occupational allergy remains unclarified and its clinical relevance is still questioned. The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of positive response to CCDs in the subjects with suspected occupational allergy and the relationship between other diagnostic test results and final diagnosis. Material and Methods: The study group included 201 patients. They underwent clinical examination, skin prick test (SPT) to common and occupational allergens, specific serum immunoglobulin (sIgE) determinations, spirometry and specific inhalation challenge test. Moreover, sIgE to CCDs from bromelain was assessed in all subjects. Results: Occupational respiratory allergy was recognized in 64.3% of CCD-positive and 52.4% of CCD-negative patients. Positive SPT results to common and occupational allergens were found in 64.3% and 35.7% of CCD-positive subjects, respectively. In all subjects with CCDs, the sIgE to grass pollens as well as to occupational allergens were detected. The total IgE level > 100 kU/l was significantly associated with the presence of sIgE to CCDs. Conclusions: sIgE to CCDs were found in 7% of subjects suspected to suffer from occupational respiratory allergy. The presence of CCDs is not significantly associated with occupational respiratory allergy. It is also not more frequent in subjects reporting work-related respiratory symptoms in whom occupational allergy was not confirmed. The elevated total IgE level was related with CCD positivity. In patients with suspected occupational allergy, the presence of sIgE to CCDs in serum did not indicate the irrelevance of positive sIgE to occupational allergens. Key words:Occupational allergy, Cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants, CCDs, Work-related respiratory symptoms MATERIAL AND METHODSThe study group included 201 patients (bakers, farmers, healthcare workers (HCWs), carpenters and single other occupations, i.e., veterinarian, poultry farm worker, cleaner, seamstress, ceramics decorator, leather cutter, pharmacist) suspected to be affected by occupational respiratory allergy (asthma and/or rhinitis), diagnosed at our Department of Occupational Diseases between 2008 and 2010. After completion of the diagnostic procedures, the study group was divided taking into account the final diagnosis (subjects with occupational respiratory allergy vs. suspected occupational allergy) and anti-CCD IgE determination results (CCD-positive vs. CCD-negative subjects) to compare statistically the various parameters. The subjects were administered a questionnaire that included e.g., a history of respiratory symptoms (rhinitis, itching, nasal blockage, cough, wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness), skin symptoms, personal and family history of atopy, exposure to pet allergens at home, medication use, and smoking habits. Skin prick tests (SPT) were performed on the volar part of the forearm with a standard battery of common allergens including tree and grass pollens, Der...
StreszczenieWstęp: Test swoistej prowokacji wziewnej -metoda referencyjna w diagnostyce alergii zawodowej -u niektórych chorych nie może być przeprowadzony z powodu przeciwwskazań zdrowotnych. Ponieważ ustalenie rzeczywistej przydatności innych testów jest niezwykle ważne, podjęto badanie, którego celem było określenie trafności i przydatności diagnostycznej dostępnych komercyjnie odczynników do oznaczania alergenowo swoistych przeciwciał immunoglobuliny E (asIgE) w surowicy w diagnostyce IgE-zależnej alergii dróg oddechowych na najczęstsze alergeny pochodzenia roślinnego. Materiał i metody: Badaniem objęto grupę 141 pacjentów -110 piekarzy i 31 rolników -z podejrzeniem zawodowej alergii dróg oddechowych. U wszystkich badanych oznaczono asIgE dla alergenów zawodowych w surowicy odczynnikami firm Phadia i Allergopharma: u piekarzy dla mieszaniny mąk i α-amylazy, u rolników dla alergenów naskórka krowy, naskórka świni i mieszaniny piór. Metodę referencyjną do oceny powyższych testów diagnostycznych stanowił wykonany u wszystkich badanych test swoistej prowokacji wziewnej z alergenami z miejsca pracy. Wyniki: Najwyższą czułością charakteryzowały się oznaczenia asIgE dla alergenów mąk (Phadia -95,6% i Allergopharma -88,3%), przy stosunkowo niskiej swoistości (Phadia -47,8% i Allergopharma -25%). Rozbieżności między wynikami uzyskanymi przy użyciu zestawów Phadia vs Allergopharma dotyczyły oznaczeń asIgE zarówno dla pojedynczych alergenów (k87, e4, e83), jak i mieszanin alergenów (fx901, fx20, ex71). Wnioski: Oznaczanie asIgE w surowicy nie charakteryzuje się wystarczającą czułością, swoistością i wartością predykcyjną, żeby zastąpić test swoistej prowokacji wziewnej w diagnostyce zawodowej alergii dróg oddechowych. Med. Pr. 2017;68(1):31-43 Słowa kluczowe: diagnostyka, alergia zawodowa, alergenowo swoiste przeciwciała IgE, rolnicy, piekarze, alergia dróg oddechowych Abstract Background: The performance of specific inhalation challenge test (SICT) -reference method in diagnostics of occupational allergy -has some limitations due to health status of a particular patient. Therefore, it is extremely important to identify usefulness of other tests, and the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of commercially available serum specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) kits to the most common high molecular weight agents has been launched. Material and Methods: The study group comprised 141 subjects -110 bakers and 31 farmers -with suspicion of occupational airway allergy. All patients underwent evaluation of serum sIgE to occupational allergens with the use of Phadia and Allergopharma kits: in bakers to flour mix and α-amylase, in farmers to epithelium of cow, pig and feathers. Specific inhalation challenge test with workplace allergens performed in all subjects was a reference method for further analysis. Results: Serum specific IgE to flour mix had the highest sensitivity (Phadia -95.6%, Allergopharma -88.3%), while its specificity was relatively low (Phadia -47.8%, Allergopharma -25%). There were numerous discrepancies between the r...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.