The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the detection of noncavitated occlusal caries lesions and to compare this accuracy with that observed with conventional radiographs. 135 human teeth, 67 premolars and 68 molars with macroscopically intact occlusal surfaces, were examined by two independent observers using the CBCT system: NewTom 3G (Quantitative Radiology) and intraoral conventional film (Kodak Insight). The true lesion diagnosis was established by histological examination. The detection methods were compared by means of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy. To assess intra- and interobserver agreement, weighted kappa coefficients were computed. Analyses were performed separately for caries reaching into dentin and for all noncavitated lesions. For the detection of occlusal lesions extending into dentin, sensitivity values were lower for film (0.45) when compared with CBCT (0.51), but the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.19). For all occlusal lesions sensitivity values were 0.32 and 0.22, respectively, for CBCT and film. The specificity scores were high for both modalities. Interobserver agreement amounted to 0.93 for the CBCT system and to 0.87 for film. It was concluded that the use of the 9-inch field of view NewTom CBCT unit for the diagnosis of noncavitated occlusal caries cannot be recommended.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.