This study aimed to analyze the surgical and refractive outcomes of XEN glaucoma implant (Allergan, an Abbvie company, Irvine, CA, USA), a minimally invasive surgical device for the treatment of operated uncontrolled glaucoma. Eyes that received XEN Gel Stent placement from December 2014 to October 2019 were retrospectively investigated. Intraocular pressure (IOP) change, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in glaucoma medications, frequency of slit lamp revision procedures, and frequency of secondary glaucoma surgeries were the primary outcomes. Seventy-two eyes of 72 subjects were included in the study: 32 (44%) men and 40 (56%) women. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 50 months (median, 26.13 months). The mean IOP before surgery was 24.82 ± 8.03 mmHg and decreased to 17.45 ± 5.84 mmHg at the end of the study (mean difference [MD] = −7.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −10.04, −4.93; p < 0.001 ). The mean decrease from baseline was 23%. BCVA before surgery was 0.38 ± 0.30, and that at the end of the follow-up period improved to 0.47 ± 0.37, MD = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.13; p < 0.001 . Additional procedures (fluorouracil injection and bleb needling) were performed in 11/72 patients (15%). Further glaucoma surgery was necessary for 23.9% of the patients. XEN Gel Stent implantation is both safe and reasonably effective for lowering IOP in operated uncontrolled glaucoma patients.

The aim of this article is to discuss how physiology and anatomical background affect the effectiveness of implant-dependent microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). First, we provide a micro view of aqueous outflow and tissue behaviour. Second, we review studies exploring the mechanisms of the pressure-lowering effect of MIGS, as well as tissue behaviour during aqueous flow and tissue motion. We also describe and classify microinvasive surgical procedures and the most important types of implants, as well as their mechanisms of action, implantation techniques and efficacy. Further, we summarize the indications and surgical results presented in recent studies, providing an evidence-based update on novel and emerging MIGS techniques for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. These data can help surgeons to personalize the management of glaucoma and to choose the best MIGS option for individual glaucoma patients.

This retrospective study analyzed the surgical and refractive outcomes of a XEN Gel Implant (Allergan, Abbvie Company, Irvine, CA, USA) in naïve patients versus those with previous glaucoma surgery. We evaluated the efficacy of XEN implantation in 86 glaucoma patients during a long-term follow-up period. Patients were divided into two groups: naïve patients (Group 1) and patients with previous glaucoma surgery (Group 2). Eyes that received a XEN Gel Stent placement from December 2014 to October 2019 were included. Intraocular pressure (IOP) change, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), change in glaucoma medications, frequency of slit lamp revision procedures, and frequency of secondary glaucoma surgeries were the primary outcomes. In Group 1, the mean IOP before surgery was decreased significantly from 25.00 ± 7.52 mmHg to 16.83 ± 5.12 mmHg by the end of the study. In Group 2, the mean IOP decreased significantly from 25.35 ± 7.81 mmHg to 17.54 ± 5.34 mmHg. The mean IOP decrease from baseline was 29% in Group 1 and 27% in Group 2 (p = 0.567). There were no significant differences between the groups in the IOP baseline level, the final level, or the change between preoperative and final levels. The qualified success rate for Group 2 was 68.7% versus 76.5% for Group 1 for the initial procedure and 15.4% vs. 20.2%, respectively, for complete success rate (p > 0.05). However, at the end of the follow-up, more patients achieved an IOP < 18 mmHg in Group 1 than in Group 2. Despite the need for more anti-glaucoma medications, repeat XEN Gel implantation appears to show promising results in patients with previously failed anti-glaucoma procedures, owing to its minimal invasiveness.

Microinvasive glaucoma surgery has gained popularity over the past decade. It can be performed using three different mechanisms. In the present review, we focused on Schlemm's canal (SC)-based surgery, which increases aqueous humor (AH) outflow into the aqueous veins by either removal of the trabecular meshwork (TM) or an increase in the tension in the TM. In primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), the TM is the most likely region for increased AH outflow resistance. Theoretically, removal of the TM can improve the AH outflow; hence, glaucoma specialists focus on microsurgical dissection of the TM. In this review, we analyzed the available literature to examine SC-related microsurgical modalities based on the histopathological proofs of the localization of resistance of the AH outflow. First, we considered the role, anatomy, and physiology of the TM and SC. We referred to studies that describe the mechanisms and potential pathways, related to increased intraocular pressure in the POAG, that are targeted using the SC-related microsurgical interventions. Next, we took a closer look at the gonioscopic tools necessary for an abinterno approach and explored incision canal surgery: ab-interno trabeculectomy using different instrumentation (Trabectome ® , Kahook Dual Blade) and variations of the technique. Thereafter, we discussed ab-interno canaloplasty, explaining the technique and reviewing its effectiveness. Finally, we presented the scope for future research in the field. Although the iStent also targets SC by bypassing it, this device has been reviewed extensively elsewhere.

In a healthy eye, the aqueous humour (AH) flows via the ciliary body and trabecular meshwork into the collector channels, which carry it to the episcleral veins. In glaucoma, a heterogeneous group of eye disorders affecting approximately 60 million individuals worldwide, the juxtacanalicular meshwork offers greater resistance to the outflow of the AH, leading to an increase in outflow resistance that gradually results in elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). The present review comprehensively covers the morphology of Schlemm’s canal (SC) and AH pathways. The path of the AH from the anterior chamber through the trabeculum into suprascleral and conjunctival veins via collector channels is described, and the role of SC in the development of glaucoma and outflow resistance is discussed. Finally, channelography is presented as a precise method of assessing the conventional drainage pathway and facilitating localization of an uncollapsed collector and aqueous veins. Attention is also given to the relationship between aqueous and episcleral veins and heartbeat. Possible directions of future research are proposed.

The paper presents the results of a 24-month-long observation comparing the effectiveness and safety of two micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices: Hydrus Microstent and iStent Trabecular Bypass in combination with cataract phacoemulsification in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. We also analyzed the impact of preoperative factors on achieving surgical success in both surgical methods. The prospective, comparative, non-randomized study included 65 glaucoma surgeries. In 35 patients (53.8%), an iStent implant procedure was performed, while 30 patients (46.2%) underwent a Hydrus implant procedure. The demographic data was similar in both treatment groups. At 24 months after surgery, the mean IOP in the iStent group was 15.9 ± 3.0 mmHg and in the Hydrus group 16.2 ± 1.8 mmHg. The difference between the mean iStent vs Hydrus after two years of treatment was −0.3 (p = 0.683). At the 24 month follow-up, the average change in the number of antiglaucoma medications used was 71.7% in the iStent group and 79.6% in the Hydrus group. The difference in mean percentage change between groups was 7.9% in favor of Hydrus. Patients under the age of 70 may benefit from a greater risk reduction in the Hydrus group (HR = 0.81), while those over the age of 70 may benefit from a risk reduction in the iStent group (HR = 1.33). IOP cases with >18 mmHg before the surgery have a better chance of surgical success with the Hydrus method (HR = 0.28), and with IOP < 18 mmHg in the iStent group (HR = 1.93). Cases with more drugs (≥3 drugs) are more favorable in the Hydrus group (HR = 0.23), while those with a maximum of two drugs have a better prognosis in the iStent group (HR = 2.23). The most common postoperative complication was the presence of erythrocytes in the anterior chamber (AC), found in 40.0% of operated eyes in the Hydrus group. The profile of observed complications and significant improvement in visual acuity allows us to consider both implants as a safe way of treating patients with early or moderate glaucoma and co-existing cataracts.

The aim of this chapter is to review the knowledge about the aqueous outflow through Schlemm's canal. Morphology of this canal and aqueous humor pathways from the anterior chamber through the trabeculum into suprascleral and conjunctival veins via connector channels are described. Additionally, the role of Schlemm's canal in the development of glaucoma and outflow resistance is discussed. Canalography as a more precise method of assessing the conventional drainage pathway and facilitating localization of an uncollapsed collector and aqueous veins is shown. Attention is also drawn to the relationship between aqueous and suprascleral veins and heartbeat.

PurposeThis study aimed to assess refractive astigmatism, in Phaco-Canaloplasty (PC) vs Phaco-Non-Penetrating Deep sclerectomy (PDS) in a randomized, prospective study within 24 months.MethodsPatients were randomized pre-operatively, 37 underwent PC and 38 PDS. The following data was collected: BCVA, IOP, number of antiglaucoma medications, refraction with autokeratorefractometry. The assessment of astigmatism was simple arithmetic and vector analysis included double angle plots and cumulative refractive astigmatism graphs.ResultsPre-operative mean BCVA in PC was 0.40±0.43 and was comparable to BCVA in PDS 0.30±0.32logMAR (P=0.314). In the sixth month follow-up, mean BCVA showed no difference (P=0.708) and was 0.07±0.13 and 0.05±0.11, respectively. However, two years after the intervention mean BCVA was better in PC 0.05±0.12 than in PDS 0.12±0.23 and it was statistically significant (P=0.039). Mean astigmatism in PC at baseline was 1.13±0.73Dcyl and 1.35±0.91 for PDS(P=0.544). At six months it was 1.09±0.61 and 1.24±0.86 respectively,(P=0.595). At two years 1.17±0.51 for PC and 1.24±0.82(P=0.917). The direction of mean astigmatism was against the rule throughout observation for both groups. Centroids pre-operatively were 0.79D@172˚±1.10Dcyl in PC and 0.28D@10˚±1.63D in PDS. At six months 0.75D@166˚±1.01 and 0.26D@11˚±1.5, respectively. At 24-months 0.64D@164˚±1.11 and 0.47D@20˚±1.43. The mean baseline IOP in PC was 19.4±5.8mmHg and 19.7±5.4mmHg in PDS(P=0.639). From the six-month IOP was lower in PC, at 24-months it was 13.8±3.3mmHg in PC and 15.1±2.9mmHg in PDS(P=0.048). In both groups preoperatively patients used median(Me) of 3 antiglaucoma medications(P=0.197), at 24-months in PC mean 0.5±0.9 Me=0.0 and 1.1±1.2 Me=1.0 in PDS(P=0.058). ConclusionsBoth surgeries in mid-term observation are safe and effective. They do not generate vision-threatening astigmatism and don’t even change the preoperative direction of mean astigmatism. Refractive astigmatism is stable throughout the observation.