The objective of the work was to determine biomechanical parameters influencing loads affecting the musculoskeletal system and shock absorption during the landing phase in Grand Jeté, Entrelacé and Ballonné. Methods: Motion kinematics measurements of the landing phase in GrandJeté, Entrelacé and Ballonné were carried out using the optical APAS system, and measurements of the GRF components-using Kistler platform. The research was carried out for three professional dancers. Kinematic and kinetic parameters of the landing were analysed. Results: The mean maximum GRF value in relation to the classical dancer amounted to 8.16 ± 1.37 N/BW. During landing, the joints of the lower limb are affected by external force moments of high values (ankle-3.04 ± 0.54 [Nm/BW], knee-7.56 ± 5.53 [Nm/BW], hip-10.97 ± 6.80 [Nm/BW]). The maximum value of the external force moments in the joint were strongly negatively correlated with the value of the angle in the hip joint at the moment of the first contact with the ground. It was noticed that the obtainment of maxGRF was preceded by a decrease in kinetic energy of approximately 50%. Conclusions: Factors affecting loads present in the musculoskeletal system during the shock absorption of a leap are: GRF values, the values of external force generated inside the joints and a change in the value of kinetic energy. The safe shock absorption after landing is influenced by properly positioned limb at the moment of the first contact, a greater range of movements in the joints and longer time from the moment of the first contact to the obtainment of maxGRF.
BackgroundThis paper presents a case study of kinematic analysis of the modern dance movement known as the “stag jump”. Detailed analysis of the kinematic structure of this movement as performed by the dancers, accompanied by measurements of impact forces during landing, will allow the authors to determine, in subsequent model-based research phases, the forces acting in knee joints of the lower landing limb.Material/MethodsTwo professional modern dancers participated in the study: a male and a female. The study consisted in recording the values of ground reaction and body motion, and then determining and analyzing kinematic parameters of performed movements.ResultsThe results of measurement of joint angles in the landing lower limb, pelvis, and foot position in relation to the ground, as well as the level of vertical components of ground reaction, provided insight into the loading response phase of the “stag jump”. The measurements and obtained results show differences between the man and woman in ground reactions and kinematic quantities.ConclusionsThe results obtained during the research may be used in the development and teaching of dancing movements. Training sessions, carried out in the biomechanical laboratory, with active participation of dancing teachers, could form a basis for a prevention model of injuries and physical overloads occurring within this occupational group.Primary differences in the “stag jump” performance technique probably result from the different educational path the man and the woman went through.
AIMS: To compare the differences in bone mineral density (BMD) at loaded and non-loaded skeletal sites in professional ballet dancers. We hypothesized that in both male and female elite ballet dancers, a significant difference in BMD will be observed between impact and non-impact sites. METHODS: 44 elite ballet dancers, 22 men (age 26.4±5.9 yrs) and 22 women (age 24.9±5.3 yrs), were examined. BMD measurements were performed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at three skeletal sites—forearm (FA), lumbar spine (LS), and femoral neck (FN)—and analyzed using t-tests, ANOVA, and linear regression models. Information about career duration, training volume, health habits, and menstrual disorders (women) was collected. RESULTS: Z-scores for LS and FN were significantly higher in men than in women. However, Z-scores for FA were similar in men and women and fell below the expected range for age (<–2.0), and they were significantly lower than those for LS and FN. With longer career duration, a trend was observed towards lower Z-scores for FN in men and towards higher Z-scores for FA in women. CONCLUSION: In ballet dancers, FA mineralization is extremely low compared to loaded skeletal sites. Male dancers may have lowered forearm BMD despite the absence of risk factors present in female dancers (menstrual disorders). Professional ballet dancers may be at risk of local osteopenia due to the “local non-impact” characteristics of ballet dance, and use of the 33% distal radius region for the accurate assessment of bone mineral status should be investigated further in this population.
The main purpose of this study was to identify a dancer’s body alignment while performing flamenco footwork to provide a detailed description that could be used by flamenco practitioners: teachers, instructors and students of different levels of advancement. The zapateado technique performed by a professional flamenco dancer was analyzed. The biomechanical analysis was based on 30 cycles composed of six repeating sequences of strikes. Kinematic recordings were performed using a Vicon system, while the measurement of the ground reaction forces (GRF) was accomplished with a Kistler force plate. The following parameters were analyzed: the time of each foot strike, the maximal value of the vertical component of GRF normalized to body weight (BW) for subsequent footwork steps, the impulse of the GRF and the kinematics of pelvis and lower limb joints, and an exemplary waveform view of the sound of footwork strikes was shown. The average values of the vertical component of GRF ranged between 0.6 and 2.7 BW. The maximal anterior pelvic tilt was 29°, with a 6° range of motion (RoM). This mobility was accompanied by 20° hip RoM and by ~40° knee RoM throughout flexion. The conclusions provide practical information that a teacher and flamenco student should receive.
The turnout of the lower extremities is the major component of the classical ballet positions (CPs) and correctly is initiated in the hips. The aim of this research was to determine the differences in the electromyographic and kinematic variables in the five CPs in ballet students with greater and lesser amount of passive hip external rotation (HER). A group of 14 female pre-professional ballet dancers 11-16 years of age participated in the study. Based on the amount of passive HER, participants with higher values made up greater rotation group (n = 7) whereas those with lesser values formed lesser rotation group (n = 7). Electromyographic activity of 14 muscles from right side of the trunk and right lower extremity was recorded with the surface electrodes while subjects were standing in all five CPs (CP1-CP5). The external rotation of the hips, knees and feet were recorded with the motion capture system. The kinematic differences between the groups were revealed in asymmetric positions CP4 and CP5 where foot progression angle was significantly lesser in forward than backward setting only in lesser rotation group. In lesser rotation group the ankle and back muscles were more engaged in CPs while abdominal and hip muscles less when compared with greater rotation group. This finding suggests that in the group with lesser passive HER the mechanism of forced turnout was employed. The most remarkable finding in our work was that various electromyographic patterns can be observed between groups in all CPs, while kinematic differences may be marked only in asymmetric positions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.