To cite this article: Gallagher AM, Rietbrock S, Plumb J, van Staa TP. Initiation and persistence of warfarin or aspirin in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation in general practice: do the appropriate patients receive stroke prophylaxis? J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 1500-6. Summary. Background: Practice guidelines recommend longterm stroke prophylaxis in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (cAF). Objectives: To examine treatment initiation and persistence and factors that influence the choice of cAF treatment. Patients/methods: This study used the General Practice Research Database, including computerized medical records of general practitioners in the UK. Patients aged 40+ years with cAF after 1 January 2000 were included. Cox proportional hazards regression models evaluated initiation and treatment continuation over time of warfarin and aspirin. Treatment discontinuation was defined as no repeat prescription within a three-month period after the expected end of the treatment course. Results: The study population included 41 910 cAF patients. Elderly patients (aged 85+) were less likely to start warfarin [relative rate (RR) = 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.18] and more likely to start aspirin (RR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.47-1.88) than patients aged 40-64 years. A history of dementia (RR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.17-0.44) and falls (RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.83) also reduced the likelihood of warfarin initiation. Adjusting for age and gender, higher stroke risk (CHADS 2 score) was not found to be associated with initiation of warfarin or aspirin contrary to current guidelines recommendations. One-year persistence was 70% for warfarin and 50% for aspirin. Treatment persistence was higher in elderly patients using warfarin and aspirin. A higher CHADS 2 score was associated with improved persistence only with warfarin. Conclusions: The low likelihood of patients with cAF in general practice remaining on treatment long-term indicates that not all benefits as observed in clinical trials may be achieved in usual clinical practice.

No abstract

Next-generation oral anticoagulants offer the potential for effective prevention and treatment of thrombosis without the need for repeated monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR). This systematic review evaluated the costs associated with INR monitoring tests performed as part of the standard management of oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists. Studies published in or after 1990 reporting the costs of INR monitoring were identified from bibliographic databases and manual searches of reference lists. Cost data were extracted and inflated to the year 2006 before purchasing power parity conversion to US dollars. A total of 29 studies reported the cost of one INR test, which was shown to range from $6.19 to $145.70. Cost estimates were based on various combinations of direct medical costs, such as healthcare contacts, equipment, laboratory tests, clerical costs (postage and stationery), telephone calls, quality control, training/education and patient transportation, and indirect costs, such as time lost from work. In conclusion, the cost of INR monitoring varied substantially between studies depending on the monitoring modality and setting, and the cost categories included. When selecting a published estimate, healthcare decision makers should ensure that the chosen estimate reflects local service provision as closely as possible.

No abstract

No abstract