To determine the relationship between insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function, we quantified the insulin sensitivity index using the minimal model in 93 relatively young, apparently healthy human subjects of varying degrees of obesity (55 male, 38 female; 18-44 yr of age; body mass index 19.5-52.2 kg/m2) and with fasting glucose levels < 6.4 mM. SI was compared with measures of body adiposity and beta-cell function. Although lean individuals showed a wide range of SI, body mass index and SI were related in a curvilinear manner (P < 0.0001) so that on average, an increase in body mass index was associated generally with a lower value for SI. The relationship between the SI and the beta-cell measures was more clearly curvilinear and reciprocal for fasting insulin (P < 0.0001), first-phase insulin response (AIRglucose; P < 0.0001), glucose potentiation slope (n = 56; P < 0.005), and beta-cell secretory capacity (AIRmax; n = 43; P < 0.0001). The curvilinear relationship between SI and the beta-cell measures could not be distinguished from a hyperbola, i.e., SI x beta-cell function = constant. This hyperbolic relationship described the data significantly better than a linear function (P < 0.05). The nature of this relationship is consistent with a regulated feedback loop control system such that for any difference in SI, a proportionate reciprocal difference occurs in insulin levels and responses in subjects with similar carbohydrate tolerance. We conclude that in human subjects with normal glucose tolerance and varying degrees of obesity, beta-cell function varies quantitatively with differences in insulin sensitivity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Our results indicate that most obese African-American patients with DKA have type 2 diabetes characterized by higher insulin secretion, the absence of autoimmune markers, and a lack of HLA genetic association. In contrast, most lean African-American patients with DKA have metabolic and immunological features of type 1 diabetes. At presentation, assessment of beta-cell function and determination of autoimmune markers allow for correct classification of diabetes in African-Americans with hyperglycemic crises.

The pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes is multifactorial, involving genetic susceptibility, autoimmune mechanisms, and environmental factors. This article will focus on two main strategies for altering the underlying disease process in type 1 diabetes. The first strategy is to identify individuals at risk for the development of diabetes and to halt the immune process before it leads to overt clinical disease, Promising in vitro and animal studies with nicotinamide, parenteral insulin, and oral insulin led to large clinical prevention studies, such as the European Nicotinamide Diabetes Intervention Trial and the Diabetes Prevention Trial (DPT-1). These studies failed to show that nicotinamide and insulin prevented the disease in at risk relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes and left many questions unanswered. The second strategy focuses on intervention shortly after diagnosis in order to arrest the destruction of beta cells and to preserve residual beta-cell function as long as possible. Cyclosporin was an effective immunosuppressive but was rejected as a potential treatment for type 1 diabetes because of its renal toxicity. Recently, more attention has been focused on an anti-CD3 antibody, on DiaPep277, and on glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD). Animal studies and small short-term human trials with these compounds have suggested that they may be effective interventions in patients recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.

No abstract