No abstract

Background Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are rising in prevalence and are associated with high health care costs. We estimated trends in U.S. health care spending in patients with IBD between 1996 and 2016. Methods We used data on national health care spending developed by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluations for the Disease Expenditure Project. We estimated corresponding U.S. age-specific prevalence of IBD from the Global Burden of Diseases Study. From these 2 sources, we estimated prevalence-adjusted, temporal trends in U.S. health care spending in patients with IBD, stratified by age groups (<20 years, 20-44 years, 45-64 years, ≥65 years) and by type of care (ambulatory, inpatient, emergency department [ED], pharmaceutical prescriptions, and nursing care), using joinpoint regression, expressed as an annual percentage change (APC) with 95% confidence intervals. Results Overall, annual U.S. health care spending on IBD increased from $6.4 billion (95% confidence interval, 5.7-7.4) in 1996 to $25.4 billion (95% confidence interval, 22.4-28.7) in 2016, corresponding to a per patient increase in annual spending from $5714 to $14,033. Substantial increases in per patient spending on IBD were observed in patients aged ≥45 years. Between 2011 and 2016, inpatient and ED care accounted for 55.8% of total spending and pharmaceuticals accounted for 19.9%, with variation across age groups (inpatient/ED vs pharmaceuticals: ages ≥65 years, 57.6% vs 11.2%; ages 45-64 years, 49.5% vs 26.9%; ages 20-44 years, 59.2% vs 23.6%). Conclusions Even after adjusting for rising prevalence, U.S. health care spending on IBD continues to progressively increase, primarily in middle-aged and older adults, with unplanned health care utilization accounting for the majority of costs.

Background The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in older adults are rising. There is a limited comparative assessment of risk of disease- and treatment-related complications in older patients (older than 60 years) with adult-onset (age at disease onset, 18–59 years; AO-IBD) vs elderly-onset IBD (age at disease onset, older than 60 years; EO-IBD). We compared clinical outcomes in older patients with IBD with AO-IBD vs EO-IBD. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing risk of disease-related complications (IBD-related surgery, hospitalization, treatment escalation, clinical flare, or disease complication) and treatment-related complications (serious infection, malignancy, or death) in older patients with AO-IBD vs EO-IBD through Cox proportional hazard analysis, adjusting for age at cohort entry, disease phenotype, disease duration, prior surgery and/or hospitalization, medication use, disease activity at cohort entry, and comorbidities. Results We included 356 older patients with IBD (AO-IBD, 191 patients, 67 ± 5 y at cohort entry; EO-IBD, 165 patients, 72 ± 8 y at cohort entry). No significant differences were observed in the risk of disease-related complications in older patients with prevalent vs incident IBD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.58–1.25), although risk of IBD-related surgery was lower in older patients with prevalent IBD (aHR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25–0.89). Older patients with prevalent IBD were significantly less likely to experience treatment-related complications (aHR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39–0.87). Conclusion Patients with AO-IBD have lower risk of treatment-related complications as they age compared with patients with EO-IBD, without a significant difference in risk of disease-related complications.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is variably associated with treatment response in biologic-treated patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We evaluated the association between obesity and risk of hospitalization, surgery, or serious infections in patients with IBD in new users of biologic agents in a large, multicenter, electronic health record (EHR)-based cohort (CA-IBD). METHODS:We created an EHR-based cohort of adult patients with IBD who were new users of biologic agents (tumor necrosis factor [TNF-a] antagonists, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab) between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2017, from 5 health systems in California. Patients were classified as those with normal body mass index (BMI), overweight, or obese based on the World Health Organization classification. We compared the risk of all-cause hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, or serious infections among patients with obesity vs those overweight vs those with normal BMI, using Cox proportional hazard analyses, adjusting for baseline demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS:Of 3,038 biologic-treated patients with IBD (69% with Crohn's disease and 76% on TNF-a antagonists), 28.2% (n 5 858) were overweight, and 13.7% (n 5 416) were obese. On a follow-up after biologic initiation, obesity was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] vs normal BMI, 0.90; [95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.13]); IBD-related surgery (aHR, 0.62 [0.31-1.22]); or serious infection (aHR,). Similar results were observed on stratified analysis by disease phenotype (Crohn's disease vs ulcerative colitis) and index biologic therapy (TNF-a antagonists vs non-TNF-a antagonists).

Distributed data naturally arise in scenarios involving multiple sources of observations, each stored at a different location. Directly pooling all the data together is often prohibited due to limited bandwidth and storage, or due to privacy protocols. A new robust distributed algorithm is introduced for fitting linear regressions when data are subject to heavy-tailed and/or asymmetric errors with finite second moments. The algorithm only communicates gradient information at each iteration, and therefore is communication-efficient. To achieve the bias-robustness tradeoff, the key is a novel double-robustification approach that applies on both the local and global objective functions. Statistically, the resulting estimator achieves the centralized nonasymptotic error bound as if all the data were pooled together and came from a distribution with sub-Gaussian tails. Under a finite (2 + δ)-th moment condition, a Berry-Esseen bound for the distributed estimator is established, based on which robust confidence intervals are constructed. In high dimensions, the proposed doubly-robustified loss function is complemented with 1 -penalization for fitting sparse linear models with distributed data. Numerical studies further confirm that compared with extant distributed methods, the proposed methods achieve near-optimal accuracy with low variability and better coverage with tighter confidence width.

BACKGROUND: Frailty has been associated with adverse outcomes in patients with IBD. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between health deficit-defined frailty (using the 5-factor modified frailty index) and postoperative outcomes in patients with IBD. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Module. PATIENTS: The included patients had IBD and underwent major abdominal surgery between 2016 and 2019. Patients were classified as frail (modified frailty index ≥2), prefrail (modified frailty index = 1), or normal (modified frailty index = 0) based on a validated, 5-factor modified frailty index. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The association was evaluated between frailty and risk of 30-day severe postoperative complications, prolonged hospital stay, and risk of readmission using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 3172 patients with IBD who underwent major abdominal surgery (42.7 ± 16.4 y, 49.3% female, 57.7% with Crohn’s disease, 43.9% on biologics), 116 (3.7%) were classified as frail and 477 as prefrail (15%). After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking, BMI, type of surgery, corticosteroid use, and biologic and immunomodulator use, frailty was not associated with increased risk for severe postoperative complications (adjusted OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.81–1.90), mortality (adjusted OR, 1.38 [0.44–3.6]), or 30-day readmission (adjusted OR, 1.35 [0.77–2.30]). Nonelective surgery, significant weight loss, corticosteroid use, and need for ileostomy were associated with increased risk of severe postoperative complications. LIMITATIONS: Limited information regarding IBD-specific characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IBD undergoing major abdominal surgery, frailty measured by a conventional abbreviated health deficits index is not predictive of adverse postoperative outcomes. Biologic and functional measures of frailty may better risk-stratify surgical candidacy in patients with IBDs. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C108. EL ÍNDICE DE FRAGILIDAD CONVENCIONAL NO PREDICE EL RIESGO DE COMPLICACIONES POSOPERATORIAS EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDADES INFLAMATORIAS DEL INTESTINO: UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE MULTICÉNTRICO ANTECEDENTES: La fragilidad se ha asociado con resultados adversos en pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino. OBJETIVO: Examinamos la asociación entre la fragilidad definida por déficit de salud (utilizando el índice de fragilidad modificado de 5 factores) y los resultados postoperatorios en pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino. DISEÑO: Estudio de cohorte prospective. ESCENARIO: Programa Nacional de Mejoramiento de la Calidad Quirúrgica del Colegio Estadounidense de Cirujanos, Módulo de Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino. PACIENTES: Pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias intestinales inscritos en la cohorte que se sometieron a cirugía abdominal mayor entre 2016-19. EXPOSICIÓN: Los pacientes se clasificaron como frágiles (índice de fragilidad modificado ≥2), prefrágiles (índice de fragilidad modificado = 1) o normales (índice de fragilidad modificado = 0) según un índice de fragilidad modificado de 5 factores validado. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Examinamos la asociación entre la fragilidad y el riesgo de complicaciones postoperatorias graves a los 30 días, la estancia hospitalaria prolongada y el riesgo de reingreso, mediante regresión logística multivariable. RESULTADOS: De 3172 pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias intestinales que se sometieron a cirugía abdominal mayor (42,7 ± 16,4 años, 49,3% mujeres, 57,7% con enfermedad de Crohn, 43,9% con biológicos), 116 (3,7%) fueron clasificados como frágiles y 477 como pre- frágil (15%). Después de ajustar por edad, sexo, raza/origen étnico, tabaquismo, índice de masa corporal, tipo de cirugía, uso de corticosteroides, uso de biológicos e inmunomoduladores, la fragilidad no se asoció con un mayor riesgo de complicaciones postoperatorias graves (odds ratio ajustado, 1,24; 95 % de confianza intervalos, 0,81–1,90), mortalidad (odds ratio ajustado, 1,38 [0,44–3,6]) o reingreso a los 30 días (odds ratio ajustado, 1,35 [0,77–2,30]). La cirugía no electiva, la pérdida de peso significativa, el uso de corticosteroides y la necesidad de ileostomía se asociaron con un mayor riesgo de complicaciones posoperatorias graves. LIMITACIONES: Información limitada sobre las características específicas de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. CONCLUSIONES: En pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino sometidos a cirugía abdominal mayor, la fragilidad medida por un índice de déficit de salud abreviado convencional no es predictivo de resultados postoperatorios adversos. Las medidas biológicas y funcionales de fragilidad pueden estratificar mejor la candidatura quirúrgica en pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C108. (Traducción—Yesenia Rojas-Khalil)

Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with poor outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Objectives: We conducted a nationally representative cohort study to evaluate the impact of recurrent CDI (rCDI)-related hospitalization on longitudinal unplanned healthcare utilization in patients with IBD. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study that utilized the 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). Methods: We identified 13,446 patients with IBD, hospitalized at least twice from January to June 2017 and followed through December 2017; of these, 1,148 had CDI-related hospitalizations. We compared the annual burden of hospitalization and IBD-related surgery in IBD patients with rCDI-related admission versus single CDI-related admission (primary reference), and those with one or more CDI-related admission versus no CDI-related admission (secondary reference). Results: There were no significant differences in risk and burden of unplanned healthcare utilization (time spent in-hospital, 27 days versus 27 days, p = 0.62), 6-month readmission (63% versus 64.3%, p = 0.8) or IBD-related surgery in patients with recurrent (two or more) CDI-related hospitalizations versus single CDI-related admission. However, patients with ⩾1 CDI-related admission versus no CDI admissions experienced higher rate of 6-month readmission (61.1% versus 55.7%, p<.001), total days spent in the hospital per year (median: 26 days versus 21 days, p<.001), total cost across all hospitalizations per year ($212,524 versus $184,384, p < 0.01), and inpatient mortality (3.28% versus 1.81%, p = 0.01), without an increase in risk of IBD-related surgery (6.7% versus 6.4%, p = 0.79). Conclusion: While patients with IBD hospitalized for CDI have poor longitudinal inpatient outcomes, recurrent admissions for CDI may not increase risk of adverse outcomes compared to one-time admission.

No abstract