Current lateral buckling (LB) methodologies can be very expensive to implement and in some cases can have unsatisfactory trigger reliability. Imposing a designed Residual Curvature (RC) to provide an initiation point for lateral buckling, by appropriate modification to the straightener settings during reel-lay installation, is a relatively new and efficient method for LB initiation and has been applied in the field to single pipelines to date. The logical progression for this is to apply the RC methodology to the installation of reeled pipe in pipe (PiP). PiP systems which are laid by reel-lay require detailed finite element analysis to determine vessel pipelay settings which ensure that the product is straightened as it leaves the vessel. In addition, imposing an RC section has further technical requirements over standard pipeline installation, i.e. meeting residual strain requirements over a specified length to deliver the required in-situ curvature needed for LB initiation. It is important to identify and optimise the solution to ensure that both installation and in-service requirements can be met and are practically achievable. Therefore, justification for use of the RC methodology for reeled PiP requires a portfolio of in-depth reeling and installation analyses to understand the application of this method for a complex reeled system, and how vessel and environmental influences may impact on the final solution. To justify the implementation of the RC methodology for PiP, advanced non-linear FE analyses were used to assess vessel capabilities, the installation of PiP with RC and to determine the achievable in-situ RC for PiP. The effect and impact of reeling on the PiP is discussed in relation to both standard and RC pipelay. The paper discusses the technical challenges involved in the installation of an RC section for reeled PiP by presenting the methodologies employed in determining the achievable RC for PiP, the potential impact from environmental loading during installation and the resultant in-situ residual curvature that is expected.
Lateral buckling (LB) design for subsea pipelines generally requires reliability analysis to evaluate the probability that a lateral buckling mitigation system will behave as expected, which means that the engineered initiators will trigger buckles sequentially before any uncontrolled buckle can form in between. As various parameters involved in the buckle formation process are uncertain (soil characteristics, residual horizontal and vertical Out of Straightness (OOS) after pipelay), a probabilistic approach is used to assess the likelihood that the pipeline will buckle at the intended locations. The Safebuck JIP has developed a structural reliability model of the pipeline expansion process to calculate the probable virtual anchor spacing (VAS). This model can be used to assess the reliability of buckle initiation on the design of pipelines susceptible to lateral buckling. The buckling response of a pipeline will always be inherently uncertain because project specific OOS information is not known prior to pipelay. The Safebuck guideline focus is on horizontal OOS whereas the impact of bathymetry is addressed in a high level fashion, with no clear methodology. This paper presents an alternative approach to account for the effects of bathymetry on the reliability of buckle formation. The model is a significant advance on the current method for estimating buckle formation reliability and brings other important benefits such as capability for modelling any transient profiles of pressure and temperature. In this paper the difference between the horizontal residual OOS in pipelines for different pipelay methods is discussed, and it is shown that the method of pipelay can have a significant effect on pipeline horizontal residual OOS. The impact of change in horizontal OOS on reliability of buckle formation has been assessed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.