The publication of this Accepted Manuscript is provided to give early visibility to the contents of the article, which will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting, and review before it is published in its final form. During the production process, errors may be discovered that could affect the content of the Accepted Manuscript. All legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. The reader is cautioned to consult the definitive version of record before relying on the contents of this document.

Purpose This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of gray‐scale ultrasound (GSU), strain elastography (SE), and shear wave elastography (SWE) for lateral epicondylitis (LE). Methods From November 2018 to March 2021, 87 common extensor tendons (CETs) of 70 patients were evaluated using elbow ultrasound. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with LE and those without lateral elbow pain. GSU, SE, and SWE findings from the two groups were compared, and the diagnostic performance was compared for significant variables. Results Among the 70 patients, 41 with 44 CETs were clinically diagnosed with LE, and 29 with 43 CETs had no lateral elbow pain. Hypoechogenicity, calcification, and hyperemia were significantly different. Strain ratio (SR), stiffness, and shear wave velocity (SWV) were also significantly different. The diagnostic accuracy of stiffness and SWV was better than that of other significant findings. Furthermore, there were no superiorities in SR, stiffness, or SWV. Conclusion Both SE and SWE can be valuable diagnostic tools for diagnosing LE. The diagnostic performances of both SE and SWE were similar in the detection of LE.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the retrieval rate and accuracy of ultrasound (US)-guided 14-G semi-automated core needle biopsy (CNB) for microcalcifications in the breast.Materials and MethodsUS-guided 14-G semi-automated CNB procedures and specimen radiography were performed for 33 cases of suspicious microcalcifications apparent on sonography. The accuracy of 14-G semi-automated CNB and radiology-pathology concordance were analyzed and the microcalcification characteristics between groups with successful and failed retrieval were compared.ResultsThirty lesions were successfully retrieved and the microcalcification retrieval rate was 90.9% (30/33). Thirty lesions were successfully retrieved. Twenty five were finally diagnosed as malignant (10 invasive ductal carcinoma, 15 ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) and five as benign. After surgery and mammographic follow-up, the 25 malignant lesions comprised 12 invasive ductal carcinoma and 13 DCIS. Three lesions in the failed retrieval group (one DCIS and two benign) were finally diagnosed as two DCIS and one benign after surgery. The accuracy of 14-G semi-automated CNB was 90.9% (30/33) because of two DCIS underestimates and one false-negative diagnosis. The discordance rate was significantly higher in the failed retrieval group than in the successful retrieval group (66.7% vs. 6.7%; p < 0.05). Punctate calcifications were significantly more common in the failed retrieval group than in the successful retrieval group (66.7% vs. 3.7%; p < 0.05).ConclusionUS-guided 14-G semi-automated CNB could be a useful procedure for suspicious microcalcifications in the breast those are apparent on sonography.

Objectives To compare the diagnostic performance between strain elastography and shear wave elastography (SWE) for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods Between July 2018 and June 2019, 66 consecutive patients with 95 imaged wrists underwent wrist ultrasound, including grayscale ultrasound, strain elastography, and SWE, because of the suspicion of CTS. During wrist ultrasound, the cross‐sectional area (CSA), strain ratio, elasticity, and shear wave velocity of each median nerve were measured at the proximal carpal bone level (scaphoid to pisiform). The variables were compared between the normal and CTS groups by using the independent t test, and subgroup analyses were performed using one‐way analysis of variance. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each variable. Results CSA, elasticity, and shear wave velocity showed significant intergroup differences (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). However, the strain ratio showed no statistically significant intergroup difference (P = 0.639). In the subgroup analyses, elasticity showed significantly higher values in the severe group than in the mild and moderate groups (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Other parameters showed no significant differences among the different subgroups. The areas under the ROC curve were 0.823 for CSA, 0.772 for elasticity, and 0.779 for shear wave velocity. The differences in the areas under the ROC curve among CSA, elasticity, and shear wave velocity were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). Conclusions SWE has a good diagnostic value in CTS. In particular, elasticity can discriminate the severe group from the other groups.