Pulse wave velocity is widely used as an index of arterial distensibility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new automatic device to measure it and then to analyze the major determinants of pulse wave velocity by application of this device in a large population. We evaluated the accuracy of on-line and computerized measurement of pulse wave velocity using an algorithm based on the time-shifted and repeated linear correlation calculation between the initial rise in pressure waveforms compared with the reference method (manual calculation) in 56 subjects. The results, analyzed according to the recommendations of Bland and Altman, showed a mean difference of -0.20 +/- 0.45 m/s for the mean carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity values (reference method, 11.05 +/- 2.58 m/s; automatic device, 10.85 +/- 2.44 m/s). The interreproducibility and intrareproducibility of measurements by each method were analyzed with the use of the repeatability coefficient according to the British Standards Institution. The interobserver repeatability coefficient was 0.947 for the manual method and 0.890 for the automatic, and intraobserver repeatability coefficients were 0.938 and 0.935, respectively. We evaluated the major determinants of the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity measured by the automatic method in a separate study performed in 418 subjects of both sexes without any cardiovascular treatment or complication (18 to 77 years of age; 98 to 222 mm Hg systolic and 62 to 130 mm Hg diastolic pressure).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This population-based study shows that arterial stiffness is strongly associated with atherosclerosis at various sites in the vascular tree.

These results suggest that in hypertensive but not normotensive subjects, the AGTR1 and ACE genotypes are involved in the regulation of aortic rigidity. The presence of the AGTR1 C allele is a strong independent determinant of aortic stiffness, whereas presence of the ACE 1 allele is weakly associated with increased stiffness.

The Omron HEM-907 device passes the two phases of the international validation protocol.

The Omron M-5I and the Omron 705IT devices pass the validation recommendations of the international protocol.

Background and Purpose-Converting enzyme inhibition and calcium blockade alter large arteries in hypertension.However, the heterogeneity of the response according to the site of cardiovascular measurements has never been investigated. Methods-In a double-blind study, we compared for 180 days 3 hypertensive patient groups treated with verapamil, trandolapril, or their combination. Using echo-Doppler technique and applanation tonometry, we independently measured mean pressure, local pulse pressure, arterial diameter, and distensibility at 3 arterial sites (brachial and common carotid arteries and abdominal aorta), as well as cardiac and carotid wall structure. Results-Mean and pulse pressure decreased significantly to a greater extent with the drug combination. Regarding arterial and cardiac hemodynamics, significant and similar changes were noted in the 3 groups: decreases in abdominal aorta and carotid but not brachial diameter; increases in carotid artery, abdominal aorta, and brachial distensibility even after adjustment to mean blood pressure reduction; and more substantial regression of cardiac mass than carotid wall thickness. Conclusions-This study shows that both compounds and more significantly combination therapy decreased mean and pulse pressures measured independently and that the changes in diameter, thickness, and stiffness were influenced primarily by the site of cardiovascular measurements, resulting in a predominant increase in distensibility of muscular arteries, little change in carotid wall thickness, but a significant regression of cardiac hypertrophy.

The present paper provides an update of previous recommendations on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring from the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability sequentially published in years 2000, 2008 and 2010. This update has taken into account new evidence in this field, including a recent statement by the American Heart association, as well as technological developments, which have occurred over the past 20 years. The present document has been developed by the same ESH Working Group with inputs from an international team of experts, and has been endorsed by the ESH.

The Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT) devices fulfilled the validation recommendations of the International Protocol.