Purpose
In this work, we want to examine whether or not there are some scientific fields to which contributions from Chinese scholars have been under or over cited.
Design/methodology/approach
We do so by comparing the number of received citations and the IOF of publications in each scientific field from each country. The IOF is calculated from applying the modified closed system input–output analysis (MCSIOA) to the citation network. MCSIOA is a PageRank-like algorithm which means here that citations from the more influential subfields are weighted more towards the IOF.
Findings
About 40% of subfields in physics in China are undercited, meaning that their net influence ranks are higher (better) than the direct rank, while about 75% of subfields in the USA and German are undercited.
Research limitations
Only APS data is analyzed in this work. The expected citation influence is assumed to be represented by the IOF, and this can be wrong.
Practical implications
MCSIOA provides a measure of net influences and according to that measure. Overall, Chinese physicists’ publications are more likely overcited rather than being undercited.
Originality/value
The issue of under or over cited has been analyzed in this work using MCSIOA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.