MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are differentially expressed and play crucial roles in cancer development and progression. Elevated glycolysis provides survival advantage and metastatic phenotype. Emerging evidence indicates that glycolysis in cancers can be regulated by miRNAs. In the present study, the role of miR-26b in the proliferation, invasion and glycolytic phenotype of osteosarcoma (OS) cells was investigated. miR-26b was reported to be downregulated in OS tissues, however, the effect of miR-26b on OS has not been distinctly evaluated. The present study therefore investigated the miR-26b sensitivity mechanism in OS. To determine the role of miR-26, we reinstated its expression in the U2OS OS cell line through transfection with miR-26b mimics and examined the effects on cell proliferation, migration, invasion, cell cycle progression and glycolytic parameters. The computational prediction tool was employed to identify the molecular target of miR-26b and was confirmed experimentally. Restoration of miR-26b expression inhibited cell proliferation, migration and invasion, arrested cell cycle progression, and induced cell apoptosis accompanied by the downregulation of glycolytic phenotype. Moreover, the binding site for miR-26b was predicted in the 3'UTR of gene 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose‑2,6-bisphosphatase-3 (PFKFB3), suggesting a role for miR-26b in metabolic alteration in OS cells. Further studies showed that overexpression of miR-26b repressed PFKFB3 mRNA and protein levels followed by modulation of the expression of glycolytic components (LDHA, GLUT-1) and markers of invasion and cell cycle such as MMP-9, MMP-2, cyclin D1 and p27. Collectively, the data suggested the tumor suppressive role of miR-26b which functions by targeting the glycolytic metabolism in OS cells, and providing a possible therapeutic strategy for OS patients by targeting miRNA expression.

Level I, therapeutic study.

Cdc42, a member of Rho family small guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases), is critical for cartilage development. We investigated the roles of Cdc42 in osteoarthritis and explored the potential mechanism underlying Cdc42-mediated articular cartilage degeneration and subchondral bone deterioration. Cdc42 is highly expressed in both articular cartilage and subchondral bone in a mouse osteoarthritis model with surgical destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) in the knee joints. Specifically, genetic disruption of Cdc42, knockdown of Cdc42 expression, or inhibition of Cdc42 activity robustly attenuates the DMM-induced destruction, hypertrophy, high expression of matrix metallopeptidase-13 and collagen X, and activation of Stat3 in articular cartilages. Notably, genetic disruption of Cdc42, knockdown of Cdc42 expression or inhibition of Cdc42 activity significantly restored the increased numbers of mesenchymal stem cells, osteoprogenitors, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and neovascularized vessels, the increased bone mass, and the activated Erk1/2, Smad1/5 and Smad2 in subchondral bone of DMM-operated mice. Mechanistically, Cdc42 mediates interleukin-1β-induced interleukin-6 production and subsequent Jak/Stat3 activation to regulate chondrocytic inflammation, and also lies upstream of Erk/Smads to regulate subchondral bone remodeling during transform growth factor-β1 signaling. Cdc42 is apparently required for both articular cartilage degeneration and subchondral bone deterioration of osteoarthritis, thus, interventions targeting Cdc42 have potential in osteoarthritic therapy. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

BackgroundTo date, the decision to treat multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively determine the efficacy of ACDF and ACCF in the treatment of multilevel CSM.MethodsWe searched several databases for related research articles published in English or Chinese. We extracted and assessed the data independently. We determined the pooled data, data heterogeneity, and overall effect, respectively.ResultsWe identified 15 eligible studies with 1,368 patients. We found that blood loss and numbers of complications during surgery in ACDF were significantly less that in ACCF; however, other clinical outcomes, such as operation time, bone fusion failure, post Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, recovery rates, and visual analog scale scores between ACDF and ACCF with multilevel CSM were not significantly different.ConclusionOur results strongly suggest that surgical treatments of multilevel CSM are similar in terms of most clinical outcomes using ACDF or ACCF.