This paper aims to propose a novel placing method, i.e., place-between-paste-andpad (PB), for mini-scale passive components to enhance electronic assembly lines' yield. PB means a component is designed to be placed at the midpoint between the pastes and pads on the length direction while it aligns with the pads' center on the width direction. An experiment that involves 12 printed circuit boards (PCB) is designed and conducted to get comparative results. Four PCBs are employed for place-on-pad (PP), place-on-paste (PPS), and PB separately. On each board, 375 resistors R0402M (0.40 mm × 0.20 mm) are assembled horizontally.To study the components' misalignment under various solder paste offset conditions in different placement methods, a stencil with 25 solder paste offset settings is utilized. Based on this experiment's results, PB has superior performance to the other two methods to minimize components' misalignment. Regarding the number of acceptable components when post-reflow offsets are within 25% of components' dimensions, PB and PP have equivalent performances, and they both outperform PPS. Furthermore, PB is a lowcost placing strategy because PB needs not the real-time communication between the solder paste inspection machine and the pickand-place machine. With the miniaturization trend in electronic products, the postreflow components' misalignment is more frequently observed than before. The placement method proposed in this study is expected to offer a low-cost exploration in the component pick-and-place procedure to enhance the surface mount technology (SMT) assembly quality.Keywords SMT assembly • mini-scale passive components • pick-and-place • place-on-pad • place-on-paste beneficial for large components in decreasing 56 the misalignment [3]-[5], it did not perform so 57 well for mini-scale components.
Motivation: As passive components’ size gets smaller, quality rejects due to overhang and misalignment after the reflow appear more frequently. This situation is partly because the pass-fail criterion is set based on the offset concerning the component dimensions. Therefore, understanding the self-alignment characteristics of electronic components becomes very critical for surface-mount assembly yield. This research investigates the dissimilarity of self-alignment in the length and width directions.
Approach: To avoid the argument of sample to sample variations, data are collected from 81 printed circuit boards (PCB) and 182,250 assembled components. Within a PCB, 25 different solder paste printing offset locations and 81 component placement offset settings are implemented. Component-placement positions before and after the reflow are monitored. The results are compared to identify different component sizes’ self-alignment characteristics in the length and width directions.
Key findings: The misalignment of smaller passive components, e.g., R0402M(0.40 mm × 0.20 mm), is worse than the larger component under the identical solder paste printing and component placement conditions. Furthermore, the self-alignment characteristic in the length direction of these passive components, e.g., R0402M, to R1005M (1.00 mm × 0.50 mm) is superior to that of width direction. The observations are not consistent with the results found in earlier research that reported on larger components, e.g., C0402M(0.40 mm × 0.20 mm), to C3216M(3.20 mm × 1.50 mm).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.