Tacrolimus exhibits high inter-patient pharmacokinetics (PK) variability, as well as a narrow therapeutic index, and therefore requires therapeutic drug monitoring. Germline mutations in cytochrome P450 isoforms 4 and 5 genes (CYP3A4/5) and the ATP-binding cassette B1 gene (ABCB1) may contribute to interindividual tacrolimus PK variability, which may impact clinical outcomes among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients. In this study, 252 adult patients who received tacrolimus for acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis after allogeneic HSCT were genotyped to evaluate if germline genetic variants associated with tacrolimus PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability. Significant associations were detected between germline variants in CYP3A4/5 and ABCB1 and PK endpoints (e.g., median steady-state tacrolimus concentrations and time to goal tacrolimus concentration). However, significant associations were not observed between CYP3A4/5 or ABCB1 germline variants and PD endpoints (e.g., aGVHD and treatment-emergent nephrotoxicity). Decreased age and CYP3A5*1/*1 genotype were independently associated with subtherapeutic tacrolimus trough concentrations while CYP3A5*1*3 or CYP3A5*3/*3 genotypes, myeloablative allogeneic HSCT conditioning regimen (MAC) and increased weight were independently associated with supratherapeutic tacrolimus trough concentrations. Future lines of prospective research inquiry are warranted to use both germline genetic and clinical data to develop precision dosing tools that will optimize both tacrolimus dosing and clinical outcomes among adult HSCT patients.
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are first-line pharmacotherapy for mood and anxiety disorders. The common mechanism of drugs in this class is antagonism of the serotonin transporter. Within the serotonin transporter gene SLC6A4, two polymorphic sites termed 5-HTTLPR and STin2 are proposed to have functional consequences and thus have been attractive candidates for pharmacogenetic studies of SSRI efficacy and tolerability. This review summarizes approximately 15 years of study of these polymorphisms as they relate to SSRI tolerability phenotypes. Four online databases (PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and PharmGKB) were searched for articles on polymorphisms of SLC6A4 including 5-HTTLPR and STin2 by using a systematic approach. Specific and general psychopharmacology terms, along with adverse effect and tolerability concepts, added to the search strategy. The Human Gene Mutation Database was checked for additional references. Forty studies met the inclusion criteria. While null and occasionally opposite associations are reported, the low expression 5-HTTLPR S allele is generally associated with greater adverse drug reaction burden during SSRI therapy. The most convincing evidence is in studies of antidepressant-induced mania and gastrointestinal adverse events. Studies of STin2 are sparse and have conflicting findings. In conclusion, the S allele of 5-HTTLPR may be predictive of increased adverse event burden, and this effect appears specific to certain classes of adverse events. Limitations and challenges in interpreting this body of evidence include assay errors, dissimilar grouping of genotypes, the role of ethnicity in associations, and study methodological differences. The clinical utility of serotonin transporter genotypes is not yet delineated but will ultimately depend on genotypic effects on both tolerability and efficacy of SSRIs.
Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor used to prevent acute graft versus host disease in adult patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Previous population pharmacokinetic (PK) models have been developed in solid organ transplant, yet none exists for patients receiving HCT. The primary objectives of this study were to (1) use a previously published population PK model in adult patients who underwent kidney transplant and apply it to allogeneic HCT; (2) evaluate model‐predicted tacrolimus steady‐state trough concentrations and simulations in patients receiving HCT; and (3) evaluate covariates that affect tacrolimus PK in allogeneic HCT. A total of 252 adult patients receiving allogeneic HCT were included in the study. They received oral tacrolimus twice daily (0.03 mg/kg) starting 3 days prior to transplant. Data for these analyses included baseline clinical and demographic data, genotype data for single nucleotide polymorphisms in CYP3A4/5 and ABCB1, and the first tacrolimus steady‐state trough concentration. A dosing simulation strategy based on observed trough concentrations (rather than model‐based predictions) resulted in 12% more patients successfully achieving tacrolimus trough concentrations within the institutional target range (5–10 ng/ml). Stepwise covariate analyses identified HLA match and conditioning regimen (myeloablative vs. reduced intensity) as significant covariates. Ultimately, a previously published tacrolimus population PK model in kidney transplant provided a platform to help establish a model‐based dose adjustment strategy in patients receiving allogenic HCT, and identified HCT‐specific covariates to be considered for future prospective studies. WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC? Tacrolimus is a cornerstone immunosuppressant used in patients who undergo organ transplantations. However, because of its narrow therapeutic index and wide interpatient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, optimizing its dose is crucial to maximize efficacy and minimize tacrolimus‐induced toxicities. Prior to this study, no tacrolimus population PK models have been developed for adult patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Therefore, research effort was warranted to develop a population PK model that begins to propose more precision tacrolimus dosing and begins to address both a clinical and scientific gap in this patient population. WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS? The study addressed whether there is value in utilizing the observed tacrolimus steady‐state trough concentrations from patients receiving allogeneic HCT within the context of a pre‐existing population PK model developed for kidney transplant. The study also addressed whether there are clinically relevant covariates specific to adult patients receiving allogeneic HCT. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE? Inclusion of a single steady‐state tacrolimus trough concentration is beneficial to model predictions. The dosing simulation strategy based o...
Introduction Haemophilia A patients require perioperative clotting factor replacement to limit excessive bleeding. Weight‐based dosing of Factor VIII (FVIII) does not account for inter‐individual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, and may lead to suboptimal FVIII exposure. Aim To perform an external validation of a previously developed population PK (popPK) model of perioperative FVIII in haemophilia A patients. Methods A retrospective chart review identified perioperative haemophilia A patients at the University of North Carolina (UNC) between April 2014 and November 2019. Patient data was used to externally validate a previously published popPK model proposed by Hazendonk. Based on these validation results, a modified popPK model was developed to characterize FVIII PK in our patients. Dosing simulations were performed using this model to compare FVIII target attainment between intermittent bolus (IB) and continuous infusion (CI) administration methods. Results A total of 521 FVIII concentrations, drawn from 34 patients, were analysed. Validation analyses revealed that the Hazendonk model did not fully capture FVIII PK in the UNC cohort. Therefore, a modified one‐compartment model, with weight and age as covariates on clearance (CL), was developed. Dosing simulations revealed that CI resulted in improved target attainment by 16%, with reduced overall FVIII usage by 58 IU/kg, compared to IB. Conclusion External validation revealed a previously published popPK model of FVIII did not adequately characterize UNC patients, likely due to differences in patient populations. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate our model prior to implementation into clinical practice.
Objective. To explore the nursing effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) combined with solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) in uremic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and its influence on nutritional status. Methods. A prospective study was conducted on 108 uremia patients undergoing PD who were admitted to the First People’s Hospital of Wenling from March 2018 to December 2020. In accordance with the wishes of the patients, according to random number method, the patients were divided into control group (n = 54) and experimental group (n = 54). Patients in the control group were given routine care. Patients in the experimental group were given MBSR combined with SFBT. The clinical data, biochemical indicators, complication, compliance, nutritional status, and quality of life of the two groups were compared. Results. After intervention, the serum hemoglobin, serum albumin levels, and urea clearance index of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group P < 0.05 . Compared with the control group, the experimental group had a lower incidence of complications P < 0.05 . After intervention, the compliance score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group P < 0.05 . After intervention, the malnutrition inflammation score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group P < 0.05 . After intervention, the Kidney Disease and Quality of Life-36 scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group P < 0.05 . Conclusion. MBSR combined with SFBT has a good nursing effect in uremia patients undergoing PD and can increase the patient’s treatment compliance, improve the quality of life, and improve the nutritional status.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.