ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation and HIFU pretreated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) in the treatment of hyperintense uterine fibroids on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T2WI) by using propensity score matching.Materials and methods339 women with 368 hyperintense uterine fibroids on T2WI who underwent single-session HIFU ablation were enrolled, including 283 patients with 303 fibroids in the single-session HIFU (sHIFU) group and 56 patients with 65 fibroids in the HIFU pretreated with GnRH-a (Gn-HIFU) group. The signal intensity (SI) value and standard deviation (SD) value were measured based on T2WI, and the fibroids were further subdivided into heterogeneous hyperintense fibroids, slightly homogeneous hyperintense fibroids and markedly homogeneous hyperintense fibroids as 3 subgroups (HHF, sHHF and mHHF group respectively). Treatment time, sonication time, dose, non-perfused volume (NPV), NPV per sonication time, non-perfused volume ratio (NPVR), energy effect ratio (EEF) and adverse events were recorded.ResultsOut of 339 patients, the median NPVR was 75.2% (interquartile range,31.5%). After propensity score matching, the matched cohort included 91 (64.5%) patients in the sHIFU group and 48 (34.5%) patients in the Gn-HIFU group. The NPVR of sHHF in the Gn-HIFU group had significantly smaller than that in the sHIFU group (60.2% versus 74.9%, p = 0.005), and the NPVR of HHF in the Gn-HIFU group was higher than those in the sHIFU group (87.4% versus 72.9%, p = 0.002).ConclusionsCompared with HIFU alone, the therapeutic efficacy of the heterogeneous hyperintense fibroids may be enhanced by GnRH-a pretreated with HIFU, however it is important to rule out the slightly homogeneous hyperintense fibroids.

Aim: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) in the treatment of adenomyosis with different signal intensity (SI) on T2-weighted images (T2WI). Methods: A total of 299 adenomyosis patients who underwent HIFU and completed a one-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the SI values of adenomyosis relative to myometrium and endometrium on T2WI MRI, the patients were classified into three groups: the hypointense adenomyosis (Hypo-AM) group, the isointense adenomyosis (Iso-AM) group, and the hyperintense adenomyosis (Hyper-AM) group. The non-perfused volume ratio (NPVr) and relief of dysmenorrhea were used to assess the therapeutic efficacy. Optimal cutpoints (CPs) of NPVr were determined using the postoperative dysmenorrhea score as an anchor. Logistic regression analysis was used to test the relationship between the NPVr and SI. Results: The clinical effectiveness rate was significantly lower in the Hyper-AM group than in the Hypo-AM and Iso-AM groups (P < 0.05 for both). The NPVr in the Hypo-AM and Iso-AM groups were significantly higher than that in the Hyper-AM group (P < 0.05 for both). The optimal CP was 54.0% for NPVr. Logistic regression analysis showed that the SI on T2WI was an effect factor for NPVr (P < 0.05), and the probability of NPVr ≥54.0% decreased continuously as the SI of adenomyosis increased. Conclusions: The NPVr of 54.0% has a clinically significant impact on dysmenorrhea scores in patients. The efficiency of the Hypo-AM and Iso-AM was better than that of the Hyper-AM.

No abstract

ObjectiveTo explore the influencing factors of decision-making in patients with adenomyosis, who are receiving high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment.MethodsA total of 776 patients with adenomyosis were enrolled into HIFU group (241 cases) and hysterectomy group (535 cases) according to the treatment methods. The general data, clinical symptoms, marital and childbearing history, and economic status were compared between the two groups, and factors with P &lt; 0.05 were introduced into multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the determinants of patients choosing HIFU.ResultsThe average age of the patients in the HIFU group was 39.1 ± 5.2 years, which was lower than that in the hysterectomy group, which was 45.1 ± 3.9 years (P &lt; 0.05). The basic medical insurance for urban workers in the HIFU group was more than the hysterectomy group (P &lt; 0.05). 95.9% of the hysterectomy group had no desire to have children, compared to 60.6% of the HIFU group, the difference was significant (P &lt; 0.05). The treatment costs of HIFU group were significantly lower than that of hysterectomy group (P &lt; 0.05). The main symptoms of the two groups were dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, and secondary anemia. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that 31–40 years old, fertility desire, dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, anemia and dizziness and fatigue were the influencing factors for the decision-making of HIFU for patients with adenomyosis.Conclusion31–40 years old, fertility desire, dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, anemia and dizziness and fatigue were the influencing factors for patients to choose HIFU treatment. HIFU therapy has emerged as a new option for patients with adenomyosis as an alternative to hysterectomy.