Abstract:Landslide susceptibility mapping is the first and most important step involved in landslide hazard assessment. The purpose of the present study is to compare three nonlinear approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping and test whether coal mining has a significant impact on landslide occurrence in coal mine areas. Landslide data collected by the Bureau of Land and Resources are represented by the X, Y coordinates of its central point; causative factors were calculated from topographic and geologic maps, as well as satellite imagery. The five-fold cross-validation method was adopted and the landslide/non-landslide datasets were randomly split into a ratio of 80:20. From this, five subsets for 20 times were acquired for training and validating models by GIS Geostatistical analysis methods, and all of the subsets were employed in a spatially balanced sample design. Three landslide models were built using support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and artificial neural network (ANN) models by selecting the median of the performance measures. Then, the three fitted models were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves (AUC) and the performance measures. The results show that the prediction accuracies are between 73.43% and 87.45% in the training stage, and 67.16% to 73.13% in the validating stage for the three models. AUCs vary from 0.807 to 0.906 and 0.753 to 0.944 in the two stages, respectively. Additionally, three landslide susceptibility maps were obtained by classifying the range of landslide probabilities into four classes representing low (0-0.02), medium (0.02-0.1), high (0.1-0.85), and very high (0.85-1) probabilities of landslides. For the distributions of landslide and area percentages under different susceptibility standards, the SVM model has more relative balance in the four classes compared to the LR and the ANN models. The result reveals that the SVM model possesses better prediction efficiency than the other two models. Furthermore, the five factors, including lithology, distance from the road, slope angle, elevation, and land-use types, are the most suitable conditioning factors for landslide susceptibility mapping in the study area. The mining disturbance factor has little contribution to all models, because the mining method in this area is underground mining, so the mining depth is too deep to affect the stability of the slopes.
The selective hydrogenation
of C2H2 on five
types of Cu(0)/Cu(I), Cu(0), Cu(I), PdCu(0), and PdCu(I) catalysts
are investigated to illuminate the effects of Cu component and the
promoter on the selectivity and activity toward C2H4 formation. The selectivity and activity toward C2H4 formation on five types of catalysts are examined using
density functional theory calculations. The results indicate that
Cu(0)/Cu(I) bicomponent catalyst presents higher selectivity but significantly
lower activity toward C2H4 formation compared
to the individual Cu(0) or Cu(I) catalysts, suggesting that Cu(0)/Cu(I)
bicomponent catalyst cannot be selected as an ideal catalyst applied
to the selective hydrogenation of C2H2, namely,
the catalytic activity of Cu catalyst toward C2H4 formation dominates on the single-component rather than the multicomponent.
On the other hand, for the promoter Pd-modified Cu(0) or Cu(I) bimetallic
catalysts, PdCu(I) catalyst presents poor selectivity toward C2H4 formation compared to the individual Cu(I) catalyst,
whereas PdCu(0) catalyst exhibits better selectivity and activity
toward C2H4 formation compared to the individual
Cu(0) catalyst, indicating that the promoter-modified Cu catalysts
should focus on the Cu(0) catalyst rather than the Cu(I) catalyst.
The results not only understand the reaction theories associated with
the experimental results but also provide the basic theoretical clues
for designing more efficient Cu-based catalysts applied in the selective
hydrogenation of C2H2.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.