Purpose.To compare the efficacy of locking plate fixation with and without inferomedial screws in maintaining the reduction of a proximal humeral fracture. Methods. 22 synthetic humerus models were used. A standardised 3-part proximal humeral fracture with a 4-mm wedge segment was created and fixed with a locking plate and screws with (n=11) and without (n=11) inferomedial screws. The intrafragmentary motion of the construct at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 cycles of 532 N loading, and the load to failure of the 2 groups were compared. Results. Locking plate fixation with inferomedial screws reduced the mean intrafragmentary motion in all cycles (p<0.01) and increased the load to failure (1452 N vs. 1159 N, p<0.001 2014;22(2):190-4 complications resulting from varus malalignment such as screw perforation or loss of reduction.
Our study shows that progressive acetabular dysplasia as well as coxa valga and hip displacement are highly prevalent and progressive over time in patients with MPS I-H, despite successful HSCT. These data may provide essential natural history determinations for the assessment of efficacy of new therapeutic strategies aimed at improving skeletal outcomes in patients with MPS I-H.
A Hounsfield range of 500-900 HU can accurately depict cortical bone geometry in the proximal humerus. Thresholding outside this range leads to statistically significant inaccuracies. Our results concur with a similar range reported in the literature for the proximal femur. Knowledge of regional variations in cortical bone thickness has direct implications for basic science studies on osteoporosis and its treatment, but is also important for the orthopedic surgeon since our decision for treatment options is often guided by local bone quality.
Background:
Septic arthritis (SA) remains a potentially morbid disease in the pediatric population. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive tool for recognizing associated osteomyelitis and intramuscular abscess, but is a limited resource. The aim of this study is to externally validate a previously developed algorithm (Rosenfeld and colleagues) to predict adjacent infection in pediatric patients diagnosed with SA.
Methods:
We identified 120 children under 16 with presumed SA presenting to a tertiary referral center between 2008 and 2018. Patients without confirmed SA, those with insufficient data, and patients who did not receive perioperative MRI were excluded, leaving 53 patients. The previous algorithm suggests that patient age (above 4 y), C-reactive protein (>8.9 mg/L), platelet count (<310×103 cells/µL), duration of symptoms (>3 d), and absolute neutrophil count (>7.2×103 cells/µL) are risk factors for adjacent infection, with 3 or more variables signifying a “positive” result. Comparing against the gold standard of MRI, the accuracy of the algorithm was validated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio (LR), and positive and negative predictive value. Discrimination and calibration of this algorithm have been assessed using receiver operating curve analysis and calibration plots.
Results:
The sensitivity and specificity of criteria from Rosenfeld algorithm were 73% and 44%, respectively. Receiver operating curve showed poor discrimination [area under the curve=0.54, confidence interval (CI): 0.26-0.83]. The positive predictive value was 55.9% and the negative predictive value was 63.1% with LR +1.23 (CI: 0.87-1.98) and LR −0.61 (CI 0.28-1.30). Only 53% of patients with 4 or more criteria had an adjacent infection on MRI. Examining our cohort, children with a positive MRI finding had higher mean C-reactive protein (77 vs. 122 mg/L, P=0.04) and were more likely to have waited >72 hours days between symptom onset and hospital presentation (P=0.03).
Conclusion:
Although treatment algorithms are an attractive tool to guide clinicians and resource allocation, they need to take into account the local population characteristics before routine implementation.
Level of Evidence:
Level IV–retrospective cohort study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.