The Dutch pension system is highly ranked on adequacy. These rankings, however, are based on fictitious replacement rates for median income earners. This paper investigates whether the Dutch pension adequacy is still high when we take into account the resources that people really accumulate, using a large administrative data set. A comprehensive approach is followed: not only public and private pension rights, but also private savings and housing wealth are taken into account. Summed over all ageand socioeconomic groups we find a median gross replacement rate of 83% and a net replacement rate of 101%. At retirement age, 31% of all households face a gross replacement rate that is lower than 70% of current income. Public and occupational pensions each account for more than 35% of total pension annuities. Private non-housing assets account for 14% and imputed rental income from net housing wealth accounts for about 10%. Some vulnerable groups, such as the self-employed, have below average replacement rates. Results are fairly similar to results found in the UK, indicating that we should be careful in evaluating the adequacy of pensions systems on the basis of fictitious replacement rates. Adequate retirement savingsIn many Western countries, pension systems are affected by demographic aging (OECD, 2013) and reforms are needed to keep the system sustainable and adequate. A good pension system protects people against poverty and smooths people's income over their life-cycle. To achieve these goals countries organize their pension system in very different ways. Considerable effort has been made to compare pension systems across countries and to identify strengths and weaknesses of different systems (OECD, * This study is part of an international comparative study regarding Retirement Savings Adequacy organized by the OECD. We thank Netspar and Instituut Gak for their financial support. We would like to thank seminar participants at the OECD Paris, WRR Den Haag, FISS Sigtuna, CPB Den Haag and IIPF Taormina. More specifically, we are indebted to anonymous referees,

No abstract

The ageing of populations and hampering economic growth increase pressure on public finances in many advanced capitalist societies. Consequently, governments have adopted pension reforms in order to relieve pressure on public finances. These reforms have contributed to a relative shift from public to private pension schemes. Since private social security plans are generally less redistributive than public social security, it can be hypothesized that the privatization of pension plans has led to higher levels of income inequality among the elderly. Existing empirical literature has mainly focused on cross-country comparisons at one moment in time or on time-series for a single country. This study contributes to the income inequality and pension literature by empirically analysing the distributional effects of shifts from public to private pension provision in 15 European countries for the period 1995-2007, using pooled time series cross-section regression analyses. Remarkably, we do not find empirical evidence that shifts from public to private pension provision lead to higher levels of income inequality or poverty among elderly people. The results appear to be robust for a wide range of econometric specifications. JEL-codes: H53, H55, and I32

van Vliet O, Been J, Caminada K, Goudswaard K. Pension reform and income inequality among older people in 15 European countries The ageing of populations and hampering of economic growth have increased pressure on public finances in many advanced capitalist societies. Consequently, governments have adopted pension reforms in order to relieve pressure on public finances. These reforms have contributed to a relative shift from public to private pension schemes. As private social security plans are generally less redistributive than public social security, it can be hypothesised that the privatisation of pension plans has led to higher levels of income inequality among older people. This study contributes to the income inequality and pension literature by empirically analysing the distributional effects of shifts from public to private pension provision in 15 European countries for the period 1995–2007. We do not find evidence that shifts from public to private pension provision lead to higher levels of income inequality or poverty among older people. The results appear to be robust for a wide range of econometric specifications.

We analyze the effect of retirement on households' joint consumption spending and home production decisions using a micro panel with detailed spending and time use categories of US households. For causal identification, we use panel data regressions. Our results suggest that the spending drop at retirement is partially compensated by increases in home production of the retiring household member. Home production can particularly make up for losses in spending categories that are well-substitutable by home production, although only about 12% of total pre-retirement consumption spending, but there is no evidence that households fully replace consumption spending at retirement. In a Life-Cycle Model, we find no empirical evidence for full consumption smoothing at retirement.