The relative importance of AR and ER activation has been studied in pubertal male AR knockout and WT mice after orchidectomy and androgen replacement therapy, either with or without an aromatase inhibitor. AR activation dominates normal trabecular bone development and cortical bone modeling in male mice. Moreover, optimal periosteal bone expansion is only observed in the presence of both AR and ER activation.Introduction: Androgen receptor (AR)-mediated androgen action has traditionally been considered a key determinant of male skeletal growth. Increasing evidence, however, suggests that estrogens are also essential for normal male bone growth. Therefore, the relative importance of AR-mediated and estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated androgen action after aromatization remains to be clarified. Materials and Methods: Trabecular and cortical bone was studied in intact or orchidectomized pubertal AR knockout (ARKO) and male wildtype (WT) mice, with or without replacement therapy (3-8 weeks of age). Nonaromatizable (dihydrotestosterone [DHT]) and aromatizable (testosterone [T]) androgens and T plus an aromatase inhibitor (anastrazole) were administered to orchidectomized ARKO and WT mice. Trabecular and cortical bone modeling were evaluated by static and dynamic histomorphometry, respectively. Results: AR inactivation or orchidectomy induced a similar degree of trabecular bone loss (−68% and −71%, respectively). Both DHT and T prevented orchidectomy-induced bone loss in WT mice but not in ARKO mice. Administration of an aromatase inhibitor did not affect T action on trabecular bone. AR inactivation and orchidectomy had similar negative effects on cortical thickness (−13% and −8%, respectively) and periosteal bone formation (−50% and −26%, respectively). In orchidectomized WT mice, both DHT and T were found to stimulate periosteal bone formation and, as a result, to increase cortical thickness. In contrast, the periosteum of ARKO mice remained unresponsive to either DHT or T. Interestingly, administration of an aromatase inhibitor partly reduced T action on periosteal bone formation in orchidectomized WT mice (−34% versus orchidectomized WT mice on T), but not in ARKO mice. This effect was associated with a significant decrease in serum IGF-I (−21% versus orchidectomized WT mice on T). Conclusions: These findings suggest a major role for AR activation in normal development of trabecular bone and periosteal bone growth in male mice. Moreover, optimal stimulation of periosteal growth is only obtained in the presence of both AR and ER activation.

Osteoporosis and muscle frailty are important health problems in elderly men and may be partly related to biological androgen activity. This androgen action can be mediated directly through stimulation of the androgen receptor (AR) or indirectly through stimulation of estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) following aromatization of androgens into estrogens. To assess the differential action of AR and ERalpha pathways on bone and body composition, AR-ERalpha double-knockout mice were generated and characterized. AR disruption decreased trabecular bone mass, whereas ERalpha disruption had no additional effect on the AR-dependent trabecular bone loss. In contrast, combined AR and ERalpha inactivation additionally reduced cortical bone and muscle mass compared with either AR or ERalpha disruption alone. ERalpha inactivation--in the presence or absence of AR--increased fat mass. We demonstrate that AR activation is solely responsible for the development and maintenance of male trabecular bone mass. Both AR and ERalpha activation, however, are needed to optimize the acquisition of cortical bone and muscle mass. ERalpha activation alone is sufficient for the regulation of fat mass. Our findings clearly define the relative importance of AR and ERalpha signaling on trabecular and cortical bone mass as well as body composition in male mice.

Muscle frailty is considered a major cause of disability in the elderly and chronically ill. However, the exact role of androgen receptor (AR) signaling in muscle remains unclear. Therefore, a postmitotic myocyte-specific AR knockout (mARKO) mouse model was created and investigated together with a mouse model with ubiquitous AR deletion. Muscles from mARKO mice displayed a marked reduction in AR protein (60-88%). Interestingly, body weights and lean body mass were lower in mARKO vs. control mice (-8%). The weight of the highly androgen-sensitive musculus levator ani was significantly reduced (-46%), whereas the weights of other peripheral skeletal muscles were not or only slightly reduced. mARKO mice had lower intra-abdominal fat but did not demonstrate a cortical or trabecular bone phenotype, indicating that selective ablation of the AR in myocytes affected male body composition but not skeletal homeostasis. Furthermore, muscle contractile performance in mARKO mice did not differ from their controls. Myocyte-specific AR ablation resulted in a conversion of fast toward slow fibers, without affecting muscle strength or fatigue. Similar results were obtained in ubiquitous AR deletion, showing lower body weight, whereas some but not all muscle weights were reduced. The percent slow fibers was increased, but no changes in muscle strength or fatigue could be detected. Together, our findings show that myocyte AR signaling contributes to the maintenance of muscle mass and fiber type regulation but not to muscle strength or fatigue. The levator ani weight remains the most sensitive and specific marker of AR-mediated anabolic action on muscle.

Simple concepts of the roles of sex steroids in periosteal apposition have to be reconsidered in the context of these recent findings.

No abstract