No abstract

bTedizolid phosphate is a novel antibacterial prodrug that is rapidly and extensively converted to its active moiety, tedizolid. We developed a population pharmacokinetics (PK) model for tedizolid using pooled data from seven densely and sparsely sampled clinical trials evaluating oral and intravenous tedizolid. Model-derived exposure estimates were evaluated for relationships to select efficacy and safety outcomes. A two-compartment model with sigmoidal absorption, absolute bioavailability, and linear elimination described the PK data well. Variability was small (clearance, 31% coefficient of variation; volume, 13.4% coefficient of variation), and absolute bioavailability was high (86%). No clinically significant covariate effects on tedizolid PK were found. Based on phase 3 data evaluating 200-mg once-daily tedizolid for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), no relationships were seen between various efficacy outcomes and estimated tedizolid exposure; the estimated exposure range (freedrug area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h at steady state [AUC ss(0 -24) ], 7 to 50 g · h/ml) in these patients was modest. Safety data modeling, using once-daily doses of up to 400 mg, showed a small increase in the probability of an adverse event with increasing model-estimated tedizolid exposure; no such relationship was observed when specifically evaluating the 200-mg dose. There were no trends in neutrophil or platelet counts with increasing tedizolid exposure. Target attainment simulations for 200-mg tedizolid indicated a 98.31% probability of attaining the target measure (AUC for the free, unbound fraction of a drug [fAUC]/MIC ‫؍‬ 3) against a Staphylococcus aureus strain for which the MIC was <0.5 g/ml. These findings support 200-mg tedizolid once daily as the optimum dose for treatment of ABSSSI.T edizolid phosphate is a novel oxazolidinone prodrug antibacterial that is rapidly and extensively converted in vivo by phosphatases to microbiologically active tedizolid. It is intended for oral and intravenous administration in the management of Grampositive infections (1-3), including those caused by methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (4). In two recent phase 3 studies, tedizolid (200 mg once daily for 6 days) demonstrated noninferior efficacy to linezolid (600 mg twice daily for 10 days) in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), along with a more favorable hematologic and gastrointestinal tolerability profile than linezolid (1, 2).The pharmacokinetics (PK) of tedizolid, studied extensively using noncompartmental analysis, were similar after administration of two solid forms of the prodrug, tedizolid phosphate and tedizolid phosphate disodium (an alternative prodrug used in tedizolid's early clinical development). The absolute bioavailability of tedizolid is high (Ͼ80%), peak plasma concentrations are achieved within approximately 3 h of oral dosing, and steady-state plasma concentrations are reached within 3 days of initiating once-dail...

Plasma concentrations of lamotrigine, an antiepileptic drug obtained in three adult controlled clinical trials conducted in the United States were pooled and analyzed using NONMEM, a population pharmacokinetic computer program, to facilitate development of dosing guidelines. A total of 2,407 lamotrigine plasma concentrations from 527 patients with epilepsy were analyzed. Regression equations for oral clearance were developed as a function of body size, age (18-64 years), gender, race, and use of concomitant antiepileptic drugs. The population mean apparent oral clearance of lamotrigine in adult patients receiving one concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drug and not valproic acid was estimated to be 1 mL/min/kg. Gender and age did not affect clearance significantly. On average, clearance was reduced by 25% in non-whites and increased by 13% in patients receiving more than one concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic agent. Lamotrigine did not influence the disposition of phenytoin or carbamazepine. Dosing adjustments for lamotrigine in patients receiving concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs and not valproic acid should not be necessary for age, gender, or the number of concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs. Lamotrigine does not influence the dosing requirements for phenytoin or carbamazepine.

e Prolonged treatment with the oxazolidinone linezolid is associated with myelosuppression, lactic acidosis, and neuropathies, toxicities likely caused by impairment of mitochondrial protein synthesis (MPS). To evaluate the potential of the novel oxazolidinone tedizolid to cause similar side effects, nonclinical and pharmacokinetic assessments were conducted. In isolated rat heart mitochondria, tedizolid inhibited MPS more potently than did linezolid (average [؎ standard error of the mean] 50% inhibitory concentration [IC 50 ] for MPS of 0.31 ؎ 0.02 M versus 6.4 ؎ 1.2 M). However, a rigorous 9-month rat study comparing placebo and high-dose tedizolid (resulting in steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve values about 8-fold greater than those with the standard therapeutic dose in humans) showed no evidence of neuropathy. Additional studies explored why prolonged, high-dose tedizolid did not cause these mitochondriopathic side effects despite potent MPS inhibition by tedizolid. Murine macrophage (J774) cell fractionation studies found no evidence of a stable association of tedizolid with eukaryotic mitochondria. Monte Carlo simulations based on population pharmacokinetic models showed that over the course of a dosing interval using standard therapeutic doses, free plasma concentrations fell below the respective MPS IC 50 in 84% of tedizolid-treated patients (for a median duration of 7.94 h) and 38% of linezolid-treated patients (for a median duration of 0 h). Therapeutic doses of tedizolid, but not linezolid, may therefore allow for mitochondrial recovery during antibacterial therapy. The overall results suggest that tedizolid has less potential to cause myelosuppression and neuropathy than that of linezolid during prolonged treatment courses. This, however, remains a hypothesis that must be confirmed in clinical studies.

A population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis evaluated the relationships of dose, plasma concentrations of bupropion and metabolites, and patient covariates with the safety and efficacy of bupropion sustained release (SR) for smoking cessation. A total of 519 outpatient chronic cigarette smokers were randomized to one of three bupropion SR doses: 100, 150, or 300 mg/day or placebo. The bupropion plasma concentration time data were fit and subject-specific bayesian estimates of clearance were obtained. Logistic regression analyses evaluated the role of dose, concentrations, and covariates in predicting efficacy and safety endpoints. For the evaluation of efficacy, patients were classified as quitters or non-quitters on the basis of a 4-week quit variable (defined as complete abstinence for weeks 4-7 of the study). For the evaluation of safety, patients were classified into two categories for each adverse event evaluated, corresponding to whether the patient ever experienced the adverse event during the course of the study or never experienced the event, regardless of whether the event was treatment-emergent. The efficacy of bupropion SR in facilitating smoking cessation was found to be related to dose and a mean metabolite concentration, and quitting in general was found to be related to the number of cigarettes smoked per day at baseline. Smoking cessation was 1.42, 1.69, and 2.84 times more likely in patients receiving 100, 150, and 300 mg/day of bupropion SR, respectively, as compared to placebo (p = 0.0001). As the baseline number of cigarettes smoked per day increased, the likelihood of quitting decreased regardless of the treatment condition. Insomnia and dry mouth were positively associated with mean metabolite concentrations, and dry mouth was inversely related to patient weight. Anxiety was inversely related to predicted steady-state concentration (Cpss), suggesting a positive effect on this withdrawal symptom. Bupropion SR exhibits a statistically significant dose/plasma level-response relationship for smoking cessation. Dry mouth and insomnia, related to concentrations, may be managed with dose reduction, with the realization that smoking cessation may be impaired.