New series of dipeptidyl boronate inhibitors of 20S proteasome were designed and synthesized. The comprehensive understanding of the SAR was obtained by utilizing the variation of four substituents. From the screened compounds in enzyme, novel inhibitors 49 and 50 were identified to be highly potent druglike candidates with IC(50) values of 1.2 and 1.6 nM, respectively, which showed better activities than the drug bortezomib on the market. Two hematologic human tumor cell lines, HL-60 and U266, were significantly sensitive to both candidates and showed nearly the same potency as the standard bortezomib with IC(50) values less than 10 nM. But as for most of the eight human solid tumor cell lines, both candidates were more potent than the standard with the IC(50) value range of 9.8-70 nM. The activity evaluation of the stereoisomers showed that changing R-isomers to S-isomers greatly reduced the potency and even induced inactivity.
A series of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids were synthesized, in vitro and in vivo biologically evaluated, and theoretically modeled for the first time. From the screened racemic compounds in enzyme, 4i was the most active. The IC(50) value of its pure enantiomer 4q was 9.6 nM, 36-fold more active than its isomer 4p and as active as the marketed bortezomib in inhibiting human 20S proteasome. This candidate also showed good activities with IC(50) values nearly less than 5 microM against several human solid and hematologic tumor cell lines. Safety evaluation in vivo with zebrafish and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats showed that the candidate 4q was less toxic than bortezomib. Pharmacokinetic profiles suggested candidate 4q showed a more plasma exposure and longer half-life than bortezomib. Docking results indicated that 4q nearly interacted with 20S proteasome in a similar way as bortezomib.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.