Abiotic stress is a primary threat to fulfill the demand of agricultural production to feed the world in coming decades. Plants reduce growth and development process during stress conditions, which ultimately affect the yield. In stress conditions, plants develop various stress mechanism to face the magnitude of stress challenges, although that is not enough to protect them. Therefore, many strategies have been used to produce abiotic stress tolerance crop plants, among them, abscisic acid (ABA) phytohormone engineering could be one of the methods of choice. ABA is an isoprenoid phytohormone, which regulates various physiological processes ranging from stomatal opening to protein storage and provides adaptation to many stresses like drought, salt, and cold stresses. ABA is also called an important messenger that acts as the signaling mediator for regulating the adaptive response of plants to different environmental stress conditions. In this review, we will discuss the role of ABA in response to abiotic stress at the molecular level and ABA signaling. The review also deals with the effect of ABA in respect to gene expression.

In order to explore the salt-stress responses of two rice varieties, the physiological responses and biochemical responses were investigated using proteomics and classical biochemical methods. The results showed that the seedling growth was inhibited under salt condition in two rice varieties, the seedling growth in the tolerant variety was better than the sensitive variety. The sensitive variety(L7) appeared obvious salt-injury under 3-day salt stress, the tolerant variety (T07339) keep normal growth under 7-day salt stress except that the shoot length was decreased. Through the growth-parameters analysis, most of them in L7 were restrained by salinity and most in T07339 were unaffected. In T07339, the fresh root weight, the content of chlorophyll and the fresh shoot weight were even increased after 7 days of salt stress. A comparison of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DGE) protein profiles revealed 8 differently expressed proteins. Four proteins were expressed in different pattern between sensitive and tolerant varieties. These results provide novel insights into the investigations of the salt-response proteins that involved in improved salt tolerance.