The rapid development of low-bandgap (LBG) nonfullerene acceptors and wide-bandgap (WBG) copolymer donors in recent years has boosted the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of organic solar cells (OSCs) to the 18% level [1−21] . The commercialization of OSCs is highly expected. However, critical issues like the cost and the stability also determine whether OSCs can enter the market or not [22] . Active materials, i.e. donors and acceptors, are the key materials determining the performance and cost of OSCs [23] . Nowadays, the state-of-the-art donors and acceptors like D18 [4] , PM6 [24] , Y6 [3] , IT-4F [25] and CO i 8DFIC [11] generally contain fluorine atoms, presenting high synthesis cost. Replacing fluorine with chlorine to make chlorinated donors or acceptors is an effective strategy to lower the cost while maintain the high efficiency for organic solar cells [26] . In the past few years, remarkable progress has been made in Cl-containing donors. In 2014, Wang et al. reported a chlorinated phenazine copolymer PCTClP with a low bandgap and a deep HOMO level [27] . Solar cells based on PCTClP and a fullerene acceptor PC 71 BM gave a PCE of 4.06%. In 2015, Pei et al. designed a chlorinated isoindigo copolymer Cl-IIDT [28] . Thanks to the chlorination, Cl-IIDT shows reduced crystallinity and a preferred faceon orientation, delivering a PCE of 4.60% in fullerene-based solar cells. In 2017, He et al. used monochlorinated benzothiadiazole unit as the building block to construct an asymmetric copolymer donor PBDTHD-ClBTDD [29] . The PBDTHD-ClBT-DD:PC 71 BM cells afforded decent PCEs up to 9.11%. In the same year, Peng et al. developed an efficient small molecular
Flexible and stretchable organic solar cells (OSCs) have attracted enormous attention due to their potential applications in wearable and portable devices. To achieve flexibility and stretchability, many efforts have been made with regard to mechanically robust electrodes, interface layers, and photoactive semiconductors. This has greatly improved the performance of the devices. State‐of‐the‐art flexible and stretchable OSCs have achieved a power conversion efficiency of 15.21% (16.55% for tandem flexible devices) and 13%, respectively. Here, the recent progress of flexible and stretchable OSCs in terms of their components and processing methods are summarized and discussed. The future challenges and perspectives for flexible and stretchable OSCs are also presented.
Morphology optimization of active layer plays a critical role in improving the performance of organic solar cells (OSCs). In this work, a volatile solid additive‐assisted sequential deposition (SD) strategy is reported to regulate the molecular order and phase separation in solid state. The OSC adopts polymer donor D18‐Cl and acceptor N3 as active layer, as well as 1,4‐diiodobenzene (DIB) as volatile additive. Compared to the D18‐Cl:N3 (one‐time deposition of mixture) and D18‐Cl/N3 (SD) platforms, the D18‐Cl/N3(DIB) device based on DIB‐assisted SD method exhibits a finer phase separation with greatly enhanced molecular crystallinity. The optimal morphology delivers superior charge transport and extraction, offering a champion power conversion efficiency of 18.42% with significantly enhanced short‐circuit current density (Jsc) of 27.18 mA cm−2 and fill factor of 78.8%. This is one of the best performances in binary SD OSCs to date. Angle‐dependent grazing‐incidence wide‐angle X‐ray scattering technique effectively reveals the vertical phase separation and molecular crystallinity of the active layer. This work demonstrates the combination of volatile solid additive and sequential deposition is an effective method to develop high‐performance OSCs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.