Differences among the various striatal projection neuron and interneuron types in cortical input, function, and vulnerability to degenerative insults may be related to differences among them in AMPA-type glutamate receptor abundance and subunit configuration. We therefore used immunolabeling to assess the frequency and abundance of GluR1 and GluR2, the most common AMPA subunits in striatum, in the main striatal neuron types. All neurons projecting to the external pallidum (GPe), internal pallidum (GPi) or substantia nigra, as identified by retrograde labeling, possessed perikaryal GluR2, while GluR1 was more common in striato-GPe than striato-GPi perikarya. The frequency and intensity of immunostaining indicated the rank order of their perikaryal GluR1:GluR2 ratio to be striato-GPe > striatonigral > striato-GPi. Ultrastructural studies suggested a differential localization of GluR1 and GluR2 to striatal projection neuron dendritic spines as well, with GluR1 seemingly more common in striato-GPe spines and GluR2 more common in striato-GPi and/or striatonigral spines. Comparisons among projection neurons and interneurons revealed GluR1 to be most common and abundant in parvalbuminergic interneurons, and GluR2 most common and abundant in projection neurons, with the rank order for the GluR1:GluR2 ratio being parvalbuminergic interneurons > calretinergic interneurons > cholinergic interneurons > projection neurons > somatostatinergic interneurons. Striosomal projection neurons had a higher GluR1:GluR2 ratio than did matrix projection neurons. The abundance of both GluR1 and GluR2 in striatal parvalbuminergic interneurons and projection neurons is consistent with their prominent cortical input and susceptibility to excitotoxic insult, while differences in GluR1: GluR2 ratio among projection neurons are likely to yield differences in Ca2+ permeability, desensitization, and single channel current, which may contribute to differences among them in plasticity, synaptic integration, and excitotoxic vulnerability. The apparent association of the GluR1 subunit with synaptic plasticity, in particular, suggests striato-GPe neuron spines as a particular site of corticostriatal synaptic plasticity, presumably associated with motor learning.

Fear conditioning, a behavioral model of fear learning and cue‐related anxiety, causes enhanced neuronal transmission in the thalamic to lateral amygdala pathway.1,2 In the expression phase of learned fear, this increased transmission recorded in vitro is revealed in increased amplitudes of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) and occlusion of paired‐pulse facilitation (PPF) implicating a presynaptic increase in transmitter release. Here we examined the contribution of L‐type calcium channels in fear conditioning. We measured the effect of nimodipine (Nim, 1.5–20 mg/kg), an L‐type calcium channel antagonist, on fear‐potentiated startle in which startle was assessed in animals receiving paired or unpaired tone and foot shock. Nim administered intraperitoneally blocked fear‐potentiated startle but not baseline startle in a dose‐dependent manner. We also analyzed the effect of Nim (10 μM) in vitro on synaptic facilitation of EPSCs and PPF in slices from naïve control, unpaired control, and fear‐conditioned animals. In neurons from naïve control animals, Nim had no effect on EPSC amplitude or PPF, but in slices from fear‐conditioned rats, Nim reduced EPSC amplitude, suggesting the recruitment of L‐type calcium channels within the fear‐conditioning pathway. Nim increased PPF in slices from fear‐conditioned animals, suggesting that L‐type calcium channels may contribute to increased probability of release in fear conditioning. In slices from unpaired animals, Nim decreased synaptic transmission but had little effect on PPF, suggesting that stress or contextual fear learning may induce L‐type channel activity in fear‐conditioned and unpaired control animal groups. We also analyzed protein expression of the α1C and α1D L‐type calcium channel subunits isolated from the amygdala and found that α1C protein was significantly increased in fear‐conditioned animals. These findings suggest that L‐type calcium channels play a role in the amygdala in cued fear conditioning and have important implications in the treatment of anxiety and in emotional learning and plasticity.

The amygdala plays a critical role in fear conditioning, a model of emotional learning and cue-induced anxiety. In the lateral amygdala, fear conditioning is associated with an enduring increase in synaptic strength mediated through AMPA receptors and with a reduction in paired-pulse facilitation, reflecting an increased probability of neurotransmitter release. Here we show that NMDA-mediated transmission in the thalamic-to-lateral amygdala pathway is not facilitated after fear conditioning, although probability of transmitter release is enhanced. Rather, the EC 50 for NMDA receptor (NR)-mediated current is shifted threefold to fourfold to the right in fear-conditioned animals, suggesting a postsynaptic alteration in NMDA receptors in the maintenance phase of fear memory. Furthermore, the ability of nonselective and subunit-selective antagonists of NMDA receptors to block NMDA receptor-mediated EPSCs is reduced in lateral amygdala neurons from fear-conditioned animals, suggesting a reduction in NMDA receptors at thalamolateral amygdala synapses. In addition, Western blots show a reduction in phosphorylated-NR1, NR2A, and NR2B subunit protein expression in amygdalas from fearconditioned animals. These data indicate that postsynaptic mechanisms are involved in synaptic plasticity in the thalamoamygdala pathway in fear conditioning and raise the possibility that: (1) downregulation of the NMDA receptor may protect against excitotoxicity of unchecked NMDA receptor recruitment during induction and consolidation of fear memories, (2) reduced NMDA current and protein may allow persistence of the "capacity to reactivate" amygdala pathways in NMDA receptor-dependent fear memories, or (3) a persistent long-term depression of NMDA transmission may occur after fear learning.

No abstract

This study focuses on changes in adrenergic sensitivity in untransected sensory axons that innervate an area of skin made neuropathic by transection of neighboring nerves. The segmental nerve injury model is favorable for this since all axons in the L5 and L6 nerves are transected whereas the L4 axons are intact. Earlier findings are that pain behaviors develop after this injury and that these behaviors are ameliorated by sympathectomy. The present study shows that behavior indicating mechanical allodynia can be rekindled after sympathectomy by intradermal norepinephrine and alpha-2 but not alpha-1 adrenergic ligands and the rekindling can be blocked by alpha-2 but not alpha-1 adrenergic antagonists. By contrast neither intradermal norepinephrine nor other adrenergic agonists or antagonists have any demonstrable effects in the normal or after either neuropathic surgery or sympathectomy alone. These data suggest that the combination of neuropathic surgery and sympathectomy results in an upregulation of active alpha-2 adrenergic receptors on the undamaged sensory axons that provide the remaining sensory innervation to a neuropathic area partially denervated by segmental nerve lesions. These changes on undamaged axons presumably compliment similar changes on the transected axons and, thus play a role in the development of neuropathic pain.

No abstract

No abstract

ADAR1 (adenosine deaminase acting on double-stranded RNA 1) is an RNA-editing enzyme that mediates adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing events, an important post-transcriptional modification mechanism that can alter the coding properties of mRNA or regulate microRNA biogenesis. ADAR1 also regulates the innate immune response. Here, we have demonstrated that ADAR1 expression increased in LPS-stimulated macrophages. Silencing ADAR1 by using small interfering RNA in macrophages resulted in the pronounced polarization of macrophages to M1, whereas ADAR1 overexpression promoted M2 polarization, which indicated that ADAR1 can inhibit macrophage hyperpolarization and prevent immune hyperactivity. The RNA-RNP immunoprecipitation binding assay demonstrated a direct interaction between ADAR1 and miR-21 precursor. Significant up-regulation in IL-10 and down-regulation in miR-21 were observed in ADAR1-overexpressing macrophages. We evaluated miR-21 target mRNAs and macrophage polarization signaling pathways and found that forkhead box protein O1 (Foxo1) was up-regulated in cells that overexpressed ADAR1. In a mouse allogeneic skin transplantation model, grafts in the ADAR1-overexpressed group survived longer and suffered less immune cell infiltration. In ADAR1-overexpressed recipients, splenic macrophages were significantly polarized to M2, and levels of sera IL-10 were markedly higher than those in the control group. In summary, ADAR1 modulates macrophage M2 polarization via the ADAR1-miR-21-Foxo1-IL-10 axis, thereby suppressing allogeneic graft rejection.-Li, J., Xie, J., Liu, S., Li, X., Zhang, D., Wang, X., Jiang, J., Hu, W., Zhang, Y., Jin, B., Zhuang, R., Yin, W. ADAR1 attenuates allogeneic graft rejection by suppressing miR-21 biogenesis in macrophages and promoting M2 polarization.