Objective The present study aimed to investigate the predictive value of some indexes, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), and systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) in the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and provide reference for the treatment. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 216 patients from 2016 to 2018. The cutoff values of these indexes were determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The prognostic value of the indexes was evaluated according to the rate of overall survival (OS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Results The survival analysis showed that NLR ≤2.695 (P = 0.017) and PLR ≤140.065 (P = 0.041) were associated with poor OS; however, the LMR and SIRI showed no significant statistical significance. NLR ≤2.045 (P = 0.018) and PLR ≤125.605 (P = 0.003) were associated with poor RRFS, LMR ≤2.535 (P = 0.027) and PLR ≤140.065 (P = 0.009) were associated with poor DMFS, NLR ≤2.125 (P = 0.018) and PLR ≤132.645 (P = 0.026) were associated with poor LRRFS, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that low LMR (≤2.535) was significantly inferior in OS (HR 23.085, 95% CI 3.425–155.622, P = 0.001) and DMFS (HR 22.839, 95% CI 4.096–127.343, P < 0.001). Moreover, low PLR (≤140.065) remained significantly related to worse OS (HR 11.908, 95% CI 1.295–109.517, P = 0.029) and DMFS (HR 9.556, 95% CI 1.448–63.088, P = 0.019). Conclusion The index LMR and PLR can be used for predicting survival in NPC patients.

Background To evaluate the prognostic value of the ratio of the standard uptake value of the lymph node and primary tumor before the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma and examine the prognostic value of the tumor metabolic parameters (SUVmax, MTV, and TLG) of the lymph node and primary tumor of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods A total of 180 patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma diagnosed pathologically from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018 were selected, and the MEDEX system was used to automatically delineate the SUVmax, MTV, and TLG of the lymph node metastases and nasopharyngeal carcinoma primary tumor. In addition, the ratio of LN-SUVmax (SUVmax of the lymph node metastases) to T-SUVmax (SUVmax of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma primary tumor) was calculated, and a ROC curve was drawn to obtain the best cut-off value. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression models were used for survival and multivariate analyses, respectively. Results The median follow-up period for participants was 32 (4–62) months. Univariate analysis showed that age (P = 0.013), LN-SUVmax (P = 0.001), LN-TLG (P = 0.007) and NTR (P = 0.001) were factors influencing the overall survival (OS). Factors affecting local progression-free survival (LPFS) were LN-SUVmax (P = 0.005), LN-TLG (P = 0.003) and NTR (P = 0.020), while clinical stage (P = 0.023), LN-SUVmax (P = 0.007), LN-TLG (P = 0.006), and NTR (P = 0.032) were factors affecting distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Multivariate analysis showed that NTR was an independent influencing factor of OS (HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.06–8.4, P = 0.038), LPFS (HR 3.08, 95% CI 1.27–7.50, P = 0.013), and DMFS (HR 1.84, 95% CI 0.99–3.42, P = 0.054). Taking OS as the main observation point, the best cut-off point of NTR was 0.95. Kaplan–Meier results showed that the 3-year OS (97.0% vs 85.4%, χ2 = 11.25, P = 0.001), 3-year LPFS (91.3% vs 82.1%, χ2 = 4.035, P = 0.045), and 3-year DMFS (92.3% vs 87.9%, χ2 = 4.576, P = 0.032) of patients with NTR < 0.95 were higher than those with NTR > 0.95. Conclusions High NTR before treatment indicates a poor prognosis for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This can serve as a reference value for the reasonable treatment and prognosis monitoring of such patients.