Background: Existing studies have shown that the relationship between anesthetic agents and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis remains controversial. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study was designed to investigate the effects of propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia on the long-term oncologic outcomes of NSCLC patients.Methods: We identified 1,778 eligible patients (propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) group, n = 686; sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia (INHA) group, n = 1,092) out of 2,388 patients undergoing elective NSCLC surgery from June 2013 to June 2016 in the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. The primary endpoints were five-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival. The secondary endpoints were independent risk factors of cancer recurrence or all-cause mortality. The data were analyzed with propensity score matching, Kaplan–Meier survival, and Cox multivariate analyses as appropriate.Results: After propensity score matching, there were 672 patients in each group. The median follow-up period was 69 months (interquartile range: 68–70 months) for all patients. Five-year overall survival was 75.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 72.4–79.1) in the TIVA group and 71.8% (68.4–75.4) in the INHA group (p = 0.160) (hazard ratio (HR), 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70–1.06; p = 0.158), and five-year recurrence-free survival was 68.5% (65.0–72.2) and 62.7% (59.1–66.5 (p = 0.108) (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.75–1.08; p = 0.253), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed there were no significant difference in the overall survival or recurrence-free survival between the two groups in each TNM stage of NSCLC. The independent risk factors included age ≥60 years, male, blood transfusion, segmental/wedge resection and pneumonectomy, thoracotomy, postoperative complications, lung adenocarcinoma, TNM stages, high CEA and CYFRA211 levels, and postoperative radiotherapy.Conclusions: Our data indicated no difference between the propofol-based TIVA and sevoflurane-based INHA in terms of five-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival after NSCLC surgery.

ObjectiveTo understand the characteristics of genetic mutation in multiple primary lung cancer so as to guide clinical decisions in targeted therapy.MethodsWe analyzed a total of 265 tumors from 111 patients who underwent surgery for multiple lung cancers. Individual tumors were subjected to histological evaluation and gene mutation analysis using ABI 7500 Fluorescence quantitative PCR.ResultsIn this study, we analyzed demographic and clinical parameters such as age, gender, smoking, alcohol consumption, pathological type, number of nodules, and other details of 111 patients with early multiple primary lung cancer. We also compared the clinicopathologic characteristics of different populations based on the gene mutation status of pulmonary nodules. Subsequently, we performed a clinicopathological analysis of all 265 pulmonary nodules from these patients. Results showed significant differences in clinicopathological features of pulmonary nodules in different genetic mutations.ConclusionThis study revealed the gene mutation characteristics and clinicopathological features in early multiple primary lung cancer. We found that the gene mutation status between different nodules in patients with early multiple primary lung cancer was inconsistent in most cases. Therefore, the use of targeted therapy based on the genetic sequencing of only one nodule, is unreliable. We hope this study can be helpful in guiding clinical treatment decisions.

No abstract